dm snapshot: wait for chunks in destructor

If there are several snapshots sharing an origin and one is removed
while the origin is being written to, the snapshot's mempool may get
deleted while elements are still referenced.

Prior to dm-snapshot-use-per-device-mempools.patch the pending
exceptions may still have been referenced after the snapshot was
destroyed, but this was not a problem because the shared mempool
was still there.

This patch fixes the problem by tracking the number of mempool elements
in use.

The scenario:
- You have an origin and two snapshots 1 and 2.
- Someone writes to the origin.
- It creates two exceptions in the snapshots, snapshot 1 will be primary
exception, snapshot 2's pending_exception->primary_pe will point to the
exception in snapshot 1.
- The exceptions are being relocated, relocation of exception 1 finishes
(but it's pending_exception is still allocated, because it is referenced
by an exception from snapshot 2)
- The user lvremoves snapshot 1 --- it calls just suspend (does nothing)
and destructor. md->pending is zero (there is no I/O submitted to the
snapshot by md layer), so it won't help us.
- The destructor waits for kcopyd jobs to finish on snapshot 1 --- but
there are none.
- The destructor on snapshot 1 cleans up everything.
- The relocation of exception on snapshot 2 finishes, it drops reference
on primary_pe. This frees its primary_pe pointer. Primary_pe points to
pending exception created for snapshot 1. So it frees memory into
non-existing mempool.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-snap.c b/drivers/md/dm-snap.c
index 746603b42f86..6c96db26b87c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-snap.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-snap.c
@@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ static struct dm_snap_pending_exception *alloc_pending_exception(struct dm_snaps
 	struct dm_snap_pending_exception *pe = mempool_alloc(s->pending_pool,
 							     GFP_NOIO);
 
+	atomic_inc(&s->pending_exceptions_count);
 	pe->snap = s;
 
 	return pe;
@@ -377,7 +378,11 @@ static struct dm_snap_pending_exception *alloc_pending_exception(struct dm_snaps
 
 static void free_pending_exception(struct dm_snap_pending_exception *pe)
 {
-	mempool_free(pe, pe->snap->pending_pool);
+	struct dm_snapshot *s = pe->snap;
+
+	mempool_free(pe, s->pending_pool);
+	smp_mb__before_atomic_dec();
+	atomic_dec(&s->pending_exceptions_count);
 }
 
 static void insert_completed_exception(struct dm_snapshot *s,
@@ -602,6 +607,7 @@ static int snapshot_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
 
 	s->valid = 1;
 	s->active = 0;
+	atomic_set(&s->pending_exceptions_count, 0);
 	init_rwsem(&s->lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&s->pe_lock);
 	s->ti = ti;
@@ -728,6 +734,14 @@ static void snapshot_dtr(struct dm_target *ti)
 	/* After this returns there can be no new kcopyd jobs. */
 	unregister_snapshot(s);
 
+	while (atomic_read(&s->pending_exceptions_count))
+		yield();
+	/*
+	 * Ensure instructions in mempool_destroy aren't reordered
+	 * before atomic_read.
+	 */
+	smp_mb();
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_DM_DEBUG
 	for (i = 0; i < DM_TRACKED_CHUNK_HASH_SIZE; i++)
 		BUG_ON(!hlist_empty(&s->tracked_chunk_hash[i]));