diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/mac80211/iface.c | 14 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | net/mac80211/main.c | 22 |
2 files changed, 35 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/mac80211/iface.c b/net/mac80211/iface.c index 42e130a6aee9..c0539e78a34e 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/iface.c +++ b/net/mac80211/iface.c @@ -2284,6 +2284,20 @@ void ieee80211_remove_interfaces(struct ieee80211_local *local) list_for_each_entry_safe(sdata, tmp, &unreg_list, list) { bool netdev = sdata->dev; + /* + * Remove IP addresses explicitly, since the notifier will + * skip the callbacks if wdev->registered is false, since + * we can't acquire the wiphy_lock() again there if already + * inside this locked section. + */ + sdata_lock(sdata); + sdata->vif.cfg.arp_addr_cnt = 0; + if (sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION && + sdata->u.mgd.associated) + ieee80211_vif_cfg_change_notify(sdata, + BSS_CHANGED_ARP_FILTER); + sdata_unlock(sdata); + list_del(&sdata->list); cfg80211_unregister_wdev(&sdata->wdev); diff --git a/net/mac80211/main.c b/net/mac80211/main.c index b6c089648441..f6860889fbdd 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/main.c +++ b/net/mac80211/main.c @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static int ieee80211_ifa_changed(struct notifier_block *nb, if (!wdev) return NOTIFY_DONE; - if (wdev->wiphy != local->hw.wiphy) + if (wdev->wiphy != local->hw.wiphy || !wdev->registered) return NOTIFY_DONE; sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(ndev); @@ -452,6 +452,25 @@ static int ieee80211_ifa_changed(struct notifier_block *nb, return NOTIFY_DONE; ifmgd = &sdata->u.mgd; + + /* + * The nested here is needed to convince lockdep that this is + * all OK. Yes, we lock the wiphy mutex here while we already + * hold the notifier rwsem, that's the normal case. And yes, + * we also acquire the notifier rwsem again when unregistering + * a netdev while we already hold the wiphy mutex, so it does + * look like a typical ABBA deadlock. + * + * However, both of these things happen with the RTNL held + * already. Therefore, they can't actually happen, since the + * lock orders really are ABC and ACB, which is fine due to + * the RTNL (A). + * + * We still need to prevent recursion, which is accomplished + * by the !wdev->registered check above. + */ + mutex_lock_nested(&local->hw.wiphy->mtx, 1); + __acquire(&local->hw.wiphy->mtx); sdata_lock(sdata); /* Copy the addresses to the vif config list */ @@ -470,6 +489,7 @@ static int ieee80211_ifa_changed(struct notifier_block *nb, ieee80211_vif_cfg_change_notify(sdata, BSS_CHANGED_ARP_FILTER); sdata_unlock(sdata); + wiphy_unlock(local->hw.wiphy); return NOTIFY_OK; } |