diff options
author | Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> | 2023-06-13 12:34:36 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> | 2023-07-15 18:02:02 +0100 |
commit | d47b9b84292706784482a661324bbc178153781f (patch) | |
tree | 8e334b4198b4905afcbe47b145b186deb8366008 /drivers/iio/light | |
parent | 6bc471b6c3aeaa7b95d1b86a1bb8d91a3c341fa5 (diff) |
iio: light: bu27034: Fix scale format
The driver is expecting accuracy of NANOs for intensity scale in
raw_write. The IIO core is however defaulting to MICROs. This leads the
raw-write of smallest scales to never succeed as correct selector(s) are
not found.
Fix this by implementing the .write_raw_get_fmt callback to use NANO
accuracy for writes of IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Fixes: e52afbd61039 ("iio: light: ROHM BU27034 Ambient Light Sensor")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5369117315cf05b88cf0ccb87373fd77190f6ca2.1686648422.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/iio/light')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c b/drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c index e63ef5789cde..bf3de853a811 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c +++ b/drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static int bu27034_set_scale(struct bu27034_data *data, int chan, return -EINVAL; if (chan == BU27034_CHAN_ALS) { - if (val == 0 && val2 == 1000) + if (val == 0 && val2 == 1000000) return 0; return -EINVAL; @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static int bu27034_set_scale(struct bu27034_data *data, int chan, goto unlock_out; ret = iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(&data->gts, time_sel, - val, val2 * 1000, &gain_sel); + val, val2, &gain_sel); if (ret) { /* * Could not support scale with given time. Need to change time. @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static int bu27034_set_scale(struct bu27034_data *data, int chan, /* Can we provide requested scale with this time? */ ret = iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time( - &data->gts, new_time_sel, val, val2 * 1000, + &data->gts, new_time_sel, val, val2, &gain_sel); if (ret) continue; @@ -1217,6 +1217,21 @@ static int bu27034_read_raw(struct iio_dev *idev, } } +static int bu27034_write_raw_get_fmt(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, + long mask) +{ + + switch (mask) { + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE: + return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO; + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME: + return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } +} + static int bu27034_write_raw(struct iio_dev *idev, struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int val, int val2, long mask) @@ -1267,6 +1282,7 @@ static int bu27034_read_avail(struct iio_dev *idev, static const struct iio_info bu27034_info = { .read_raw = &bu27034_read_raw, .write_raw = &bu27034_write_raw, + .write_raw_get_fmt = &bu27034_write_raw_get_fmt, .read_avail = &bu27034_read_avail, }; |