summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorsilviazhao <silviazhao-oc@zhaoxin.com>2023-02-08 16:27:22 +0800
committerPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>2023-02-11 11:18:12 +0100
commitfd636b6a9bc6034f2e5bb869658898a2b472c037 (patch)
treeea25b1fe7f1f912f0854adc246bc59b3d4414b45 /arch
parent89e97eb8cec0f1af5ebf2380308913256ca7915a (diff)
x86/perf/zhaoxin: Add stepping check for ZXC
Some of Nano series processors will lead GP when accessing PMC fixed counter. Meanwhile, their hardware support for PMC has not announced externally. So exclude Nano CPUs from ZXC by checking stepping information. This is an unambiguous way to differentiate between ZXC and Nano CPUs. Following are Nano and ZXC FMS information: Nano FMS: Family=6, Model=F, Stepping=[0-A][C-D] ZXC FMS: Family=6, Model=F, Stepping=E-F OR Family=6, Model=0x19, Stepping=0-3 Fixes: 3a4ac121c2ca ("x86/perf: Add hardware performance events support for Zhaoxin CPU.") Reported-by: Arjan <8vvbbqzo567a@nospam.xutrox.com> Reported-by: Kevin Brace <kevinbrace@gmx.com> Signed-off-by: silviazhao <silviazhao-oc@zhaoxin.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212389
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/events/zhaoxin/core.c8
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/zhaoxin/core.c b/arch/x86/events/zhaoxin/core.c
index 949d845c922b..3e9acdaeed1e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/zhaoxin/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/zhaoxin/core.c
@@ -541,7 +541,13 @@ __init int zhaoxin_pmu_init(void)
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86) {
case 0x06:
- if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 0x0f || boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 0x19) {
+ /*
+ * Support Zhaoxin CPU from ZXC series, exclude Nano series through FMS.
+ * Nano FMS: Family=6, Model=F, Stepping=[0-A][C-D]
+ * ZXC FMS: Family=6, Model=F, Stepping=E-F OR Family=6, Model=0x19, Stepping=0-3
+ */
+ if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 0x0f && boot_cpu_data.x86_stepping >= 0x0e) ||
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 0x19) {
x86_pmu.max_period = x86_pmu.cntval_mask >> 1;