Merge tag 'docs-6.6' of git://git.lwn.net/linux

Pull documentation updates from Jonathan Corbet:
 "Documentation work keeps chugging along; this includes:

   - Work from Carlos Bilbao to integrate rustdoc output into the
     generated HTML documentation. This took some work to figure out how
     to do it without slowing the docs build and without creating people
     who don't have Rust installed, but Carlos got there

   - Move the loongarch and mips architecture documentation under
     Documentation/arch/

   - Some more maintainer documentation from Jakub

  ... plus the usual assortment of updates, translations, and fixes"

* tag 'docs-6.6' of git://git.lwn.net/linux: (56 commits)
  Docu: genericirq.rst: fix irq-example
  input: docs: pxrc: remove reference to phoenix-sim
  Documentation: serial-console: Fix literal block marker
  docs/mm: remove references to hmm_mirror ops and clean typos
  docs/zh_CN: correct regi_chg(),regi_add() to region_chg(),region_add()
  Documentation: Fix typos
  Documentation/ABI: Fix typos
  scripts: kernel-doc: fix macro handling in enums
  scripts: kernel-doc: parse DEFINE_DMA_UNMAP_[ADDR|LEN]
  Documentation: riscv: Update boot image header since EFI stub is supported
  Documentation: riscv: Add early boot document
  Documentation: arm: Add bootargs to the table of added DT parameters
  docs: kernel-parameters: Refer to the correct bitmap function
  doc: update params of memhp_default_state=
  docs: Add book to process/kernel-docs.rst
  docs: sparse: fix invalid link addresses
  docs: vfs: clean up after the iterate() removal
  docs: Add a section on surveys to the researcher guidelines
  docs: move mips under arch
  docs: move loongarch under arch
  ...

3 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/completion.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.rst
index 9f039b4f4b09..f19aca2062bd 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/completion.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.rst
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ A typical usage scenario is::
 
 	/* run non-dependent code */		/* do setup */
 
-	wait_for_completion(&setup_done);	complete(setup_done);
+	wait_for_completion(&setup_done);	complete(&setup_done);
 
 This is not implying any particular order between wait_for_completion() and
 the call to complete() - if the call to complete() happened before the call
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
index f166b182ff95..41ed2ceafc92 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ average usage, albeit over a longer time window than a single period.  This
 also limits the burst ability to no more than 1ms per cpu.  This provides
 better more predictable user experience for highly threaded applications with
 small quota limits on high core count machines. It also eliminates the
-propensity to throttle these applications while simultanously using less than
+propensity to throttle these applications while simultaneously using less than
 quota amounts of cpu. Another way to say this, is that by allowing the unused
 portion of a slice to remain valid across periods we have decreased the
 possibility of wastefully expiring quota on cpu-local silos that don't need a
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst
index 8fbce5e767d9..fc853c8cc346 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ through the arch_scale_cpu_capacity() callback.
 The rest of platform knowledge used by EAS is directly read from the Energy
 Model (EM) framework. The EM of a platform is composed of a power cost table
 per 'performance domain' in the system (see Documentation/power/energy-model.rst
-for futher details about performance domains).
+for further details about performance domains).
 
 The scheduler manages references to the EM objects in the topology code when the
 scheduling domains are built, or re-built. For each root domain (rd), the
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ mechanism called 'over-utilization'.
 From a general standpoint, the use-cases where EAS can help the most are those
 involving a light/medium CPU utilization. Whenever long CPU-bound tasks are
 being run, they will require all of the available CPU capacity, and there isn't
-much that can be done by the scheduler to save energy without severly harming
+much that can be done by the scheduler to save energy without severely harming
 throughput. In order to avoid hurting performance with EAS, CPUs are flagged as
 'over-utilized' as soon as they are used at more than 80% of their compute
 capacity. As long as no CPUs are over-utilized in a root domain, load balancing