diff options
author | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> | 2015-06-25 15:00:21 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2015-06-25 17:00:36 -0700 |
commit | f405c445a4866caa43101c231721123805a23bbf (patch) | |
tree | a3cf9d9ed91314ef7db9ac16a3e3d3599a1dde21 /Documentation/blockdev | |
parent | 92ff15288747b80730f0132e9c98403370c27b34 (diff) |
zram: close race by open overriding
[ Original patch from Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> ]
Commit ba6b17d68c8e ("zram: fix umount-reset_store-mount race
condition") introduced bdev->bd_mutex to protect a race between mount
and reset. At that time, we don't have dynamic zram-add/remove feature
so it was okay.
However, as we introduce dynamic device feature, bd_mutex became
trouble.
CPU 0
echo 1 > /sys/block/zram<id>/reset
-> kernfs->s_active(A)
-> zram:reset_store->bd_mutex(B)
CPU 1
echo <id> > /sys/class/zram/zram-remove
->zram:zram_remove: bd_mutex(B)
-> sysfs_remove_group
-> kernfs->s_active(A)
IOW, AB -> BA deadlock
The reason we are holding bd_mutex for zram_remove is to prevent
any incoming open /dev/zram[0-9]. Otherwise, we could remove zram
others already have opened. But it causes above deadlock problem.
To fix the problem, this patch overrides block_device.open and
it returns -EBUSY if zram asserts he claims zram to reset so any
incoming open will be failed so we don't need to hold bd_mutex
for zram_remove ayn more.
This patch is to prepare for zram-add/remove feature.
[sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com: simplify reset_store()]
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/blockdev')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions