diff options
| author | Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn> | 2022-01-28 12:47:15 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2022-01-28 14:56:47 +0000 |
| commit | 4e0f718daf97d47cf7dec122da1be970f145c809 (patch) | |
| tree | 4001e81876318954a7351c2178c164ec332b1427 | |
| parent | 928d6fe996f69330ded6b887baf4534c5fac7988 (diff) | |
ax25: improve the incomplete fix to avoid UAF and NPD bugs
The previous commit 1ade48d0c27d ("ax25: NPD bug when detaching
AX25 device") introduce lock_sock() into ax25_kill_by_device to
prevent NPD bug. But the concurrency NPD or UAF bug will occur,
when lock_sock() or release_sock() dereferences the ax25_cb->sock.
The NULL pointer dereference bug can be shown as below:
ax25_kill_by_device() | ax25_release()
| ax25_destroy_socket()
| ax25_cb_del()
... | ...
| ax25->sk=NULL;
lock_sock(s->sk); //(1) |
s->ax25_dev = NULL; | ...
release_sock(s->sk); //(2) |
... |
The root cause is that the sock is set to null before dereference
site (1) or (2). Therefore, this patch extracts the ax25_cb->sock
in advance, and uses ax25_list_lock to protect it, which can synchronize
with ax25_cb_del() and ensure the value of sock is not null before
dereference sites.
The concurrency UAF bug can be shown as below:
ax25_kill_by_device() | ax25_release()
| ax25_destroy_socket()
... | ...
| sock_put(sk); //FREE
lock_sock(s->sk); //(1) |
s->ax25_dev = NULL; | ...
release_sock(s->sk); //(2) |
... |
The root cause is that the sock is released before dereference
site (1) or (2). Therefore, this patch uses sock_hold() to increase
the refcount of sock and uses ax25_list_lock to protect it, which
can synchronize with ax25_cb_del() in ax25_destroy_socket() and
ensure the sock wil not be released before dereference sites.
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c index 02f43f3e2c56..44a8730c26ac 100644 --- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c +++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev) { ax25_dev *ax25_dev; ax25_cb *s; + struct sock *sk; if ((ax25_dev = ax25_dev_ax25dev(dev)) == NULL) return; @@ -85,13 +86,15 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev) again: ax25_for_each(s, &ax25_list) { if (s->ax25_dev == ax25_dev) { + sk = s->sk; + sock_hold(sk); spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); - lock_sock(s->sk); + lock_sock(sk); s->ax25_dev = NULL; - release_sock(s->sk); + release_sock(sk); ax25_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH); spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); - + sock_put(sk); /* The entry could have been deleted from the * list meanwhile and thus the next pointer is * no longer valid. Play it safe and restart |