diff options
| author | Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> | 2012-10-31 02:26:55 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2012-11-15 00:31:26 +0100 |
| commit | 73a3090a2160fb01317f5a44af6ee5a064a29625 (patch) | |
| tree | ae9505645e07198991f9cb8b04c93c7e3e122283 /drivers/acpi/acpica/utmutex.c | |
| parent | b9e17693576e4739cd267f59cbdfdd33c5eefe76 (diff) | |
ACPICA: Remove extra spaces after periods within comments
This makes all comments consistent.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/acpi/acpica/utmutex.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/acpi/acpica/utmutex.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/utmutex.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/utmutex.c index 93a119199335..5ccf57c0d87e 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/utmutex.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/utmutex.c @@ -228,9 +228,9 @@ acpi_status acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(acpi_mutex_handle mutex_id) /* * Mutex debug code, for internal debugging only. * - * Deadlock prevention. Check if this thread owns any mutexes of value - * greater than or equal to this one. If so, the thread has violated - * the mutex ordering rule. This indicates a coding error somewhere in + * Deadlock prevention. Check if this thread owns any mutexes of value + * greater than or equal to this one. If so, the thread has violated + * the mutex ordering rule. This indicates a coding error somewhere in * the ACPI subsystem code. */ for (i = mutex_id; i < ACPI_NUM_MUTEX; i++) { @@ -321,9 +321,9 @@ acpi_status acpi_ut_release_mutex(acpi_mutex_handle mutex_id) /* * Mutex debug code, for internal debugging only. * - * Deadlock prevention. Check if this thread owns any mutexes of value - * greater than this one. If so, the thread has violated the mutex - * ordering rule. This indicates a coding error somewhere in + * Deadlock prevention. Check if this thread owns any mutexes of value + * greater than this one. If so, the thread has violated the mutex + * ordering rule. This indicates a coding error somewhere in * the ACPI subsystem code. */ for (i = mutex_id; i < ACPI_NUM_MUTEX; i++) { |