summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>2018-09-25 14:02:32 +0100
committerPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>2018-09-25 15:13:24 +0100
commitb187e20f9b902b611ca9288cef5c490cbb2d91dd (patch)
treecbf14228e091b5100f2e9183c44cc417332e325e
parent5d026de8b6aeb4d494c21ac32112c2821bd05422 (diff)
hw/net/pcnet-pci: Unify pcnet_ioport_read/write and pcnet_mmio_read/write
The only difference between our implementation of the pcnet ioport accessors and the mmio accessors is that the former check BCR_DWIO to see what access widths are permitted for addresses in the aprom range (0x0..0xf). In fact our failure to do this in the mmio accessors is a bug (one which was fixed for the ioport accessors in commit 7ba79741970 in 2011). The data sheet for the Am79C970A does not describe the DWIO bit as only applying for I/O space mapped I/O resources and not memory mapped I/O resources, and our MMIO accessors already honour DWIO for accesses in the 0x10..0x1f range (since the pcnet_ioport_{read,write}{w,l} functions check it). The data sheet for the later but compatible Am79C976 is clearer: it states specifically "DWIO mode applies to both I/O- and memory-mapped acceses." This seems to be reasonable evidence in favour of interpretating the Am79C970A spec as being the same. (NB: Linux's pcnet driver only supports I/O accesses, so the MMIO access part of this device is probably untested anyway.) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
-rw-r--r--hw/net/pcnet-pci.c67
-rw-r--r--hw/net/trace-events2
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 67 deletions
diff --git a/hw/net/pcnet-pci.c b/hw/net/pcnet-pci.c
index 248fb3ba29..7c73855783 100644
--- a/hw/net/pcnet-pci.c
+++ b/hw/net/pcnet-pci.c
@@ -139,69 +139,6 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps pcnet_io_ops = {
.endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
};
-/*
- * TODO: should MMIO accesses to the addresses corresponding to the
- * APROM also honour the BCR_DWIO() setting? If so, then these functions
- * and pcnet_ioport_write/pcnet_ioport_read could be merged.
- * If not, then should pcnet_ioport_{read,write}{w,l} really check
- * BCR_DWIO() for MMIO writes ?
- */
-static void pcnet_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t value,
- unsigned size)
-{
- PCNetState *d = opaque;
-
- trace_pcnet_mmio_write(opaque, addr, size, val);
-
- if (addr < 0x10) {
- if (size == 1) {
- pcnet_aprom_writeb(d, addr, data);
- } else if ((addr & 1) == 0 && size == 2) {
- pcnet_aprom_writeb(d, addr, data & 0xff);
- pcnet_aprom_writeb(d, addr + 1, data >> 8);
- } else if ((addr & 3) == 0 && size == 4) {
- pcnet_aprom_writeb(d, addr, data & 0xff);
- pcnet_aprom_writeb(d, addr + 1, (data >> 8) & 0xff);
- pcnet_aprom_writeb(d, addr + 2, (data >> 16) & 0xff);
- pcnet_aprom_writeb(d, addr + 3, data >> 24);
- }
- } else {
- if (size == 2) {
- pcnet_ioport_writew(d, addr, data);
- } else if (size == 4) {
- pcnet_ioport_writel(d, addr, data);
- }
- }
-}
-
-static uint64_t pcnet_mmio_read(void *opque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
-{
- PCNetState *d = opaque;
-
- trace_pcnet_ioport_read(opaque, addr, size);
-
- if (addr < 0x10) {
- if (size == 1) {
- return pcnet_aprom_readb(d, addr);
- } else if ((addr & 1) == 0 && size == 2) {
- return pcnet_aprom_readb(d, addr) |
- (pcnet_aprom_readb(d, addr + 1) << 8);
- } else if ((addr & 3) == 0 && size == 4) {
- return pcnet_aprom_readb(d, addr) |
- (pcnet_aprom_readb(d, addr + 1) << 8) |
- (pcnet_aprom_readb(d, addr + 2) << 16) |
- (pcnet_aprom_readb(d, addr + 3) << 24);
- }
- } else {
- if (size == 2) {
- return pcnet_ioport_readw(d, addr);
- } else if (size == 4) {
- return pcnet_ioport_readl(d, addr);
- }
- }
- return ((uint64_t)1 << (size * 8)) - 1;
-}
-
static const VMStateDescription vmstate_pci_pcnet = {
.name = "pcnet",
.version_id = 3,
@@ -216,8 +153,8 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_pci_pcnet = {
/* PCI interface */
static const MemoryRegionOps pcnet_mmio_ops = {
- .read = pcnet_mmio_read,
- .write = pcnet_mmio_write,
+ .read = pcnet_ioport_read,
+ .write = pcnet_ioport_write,
.valid.min_access_size = 1,
.valid.max_access_size = 4,
.impl.min_access_size = 1,
diff --git a/hw/net/trace-events b/hw/net/trace-events
index 5cd0ad50ce..c1dea4b156 100644
--- a/hw/net/trace-events
+++ b/hw/net/trace-events
@@ -61,8 +61,6 @@ pcnet_aprom_writeb(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val) "opaque=%p addr=0x
pcnet_aprom_readb(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val) "opaque=%p addr=0x%08x val=0x%02x"
pcnet_ioport_read(void *opaque, uint64_t addr, unsigned size) "opaque=%p addr=0x%"PRIx64" size=%d"
pcnet_ioport_write(void *opaque, uint64_t addr, uint64_t data, unsigned size) "opaque=%p addr=0x%"PRIx64" data=0x%"PRIx64" size=%d"
-pcnet_mmio_write(void *opaque, uint64_t addr, uint32_t val, unsigned size) "opaque=%p addr=0x%"PRIx64" val=0x%x size=%d"
-pcnet_mmio_read(void *opaque, uint64_t addr, unsigned size) "opaque=%p addr=0x%"PRIx64" size=%d"
# hw/net/net_rx_pkt.c
net_rx_pkt_parsed(bool ip4, bool ip6, bool udp, bool tcp, size_t l3o, size_t l4o, size_t l5o) "RX packet parsed: ip4: %d, ip6: %d, udp: %d, tcp: %d, l3 offset: %zu, l4 offset: %zu, l5 offset: %zu"