summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/devinfo.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBrian Paul <brianp@vmware.com>2015-05-25 09:42:04 -0600
committerBrian Paul <brianp@vmware.com>2015-05-26 10:02:59 -0600
commitd959885b9109878acc427b9321e46d8c6d133d1a (patch)
tree6987b4aace6ab92086c83117af3ca4ffdc1fddd2 /docs/devinfo.html
parent98f2f47f7a1d893bb482d508a690c417c2453c6e (diff)
docs: update documentation about patch formatting, testing, etc
v2: correctly escape < and > chars. Reviewed-by: Thomas Helland <thomashelland90@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/devinfo.html')
-rw-r--r--docs/devinfo.html104
1 files changed, 102 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/docs/devinfo.html b/docs/devinfo.html
index c7e4171a9c..e068d87da1 100644
--- a/docs/devinfo.html
+++ b/docs/devinfo.html
@@ -124,13 +124,113 @@ src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp can serve as examples.
<h2 id="submitting">Submitting patches</h2>
<p>
-You should always run the Mesa Testsuite before submitting patches.
-The Testsuite can be run using the 'make check' command. All tests
+The basic guidelines for submitting patches are:
+</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Patches should be sufficiently tested before submitting.
+<li>Code patches should follow Mesa coding conventions.
+<li>Whenever possible, patches should only effect individual Mesa/Gallium
+components.
+<li>Patches should never introduce build breaks and should be bisectable (see
+<code>git bisect</code>.)
+<li>Patches should be properly formatted (see below).
+<li>Patches should be submitted to mesa-dev for review using
+<code>git send-email</code>.
+<li>Patches should not mix code changes with code formatting changes (except,
+perhaps, in very trivial cases.)
+</ul>
+
+<h3>Patch formatting</h3>
+
+<p>
+The basic rules for patch formatting are:
+</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Lines should be limited to 75 characters or less so that git logs
+displayed in 80-column terminals avoid line wrapping. Note that git
+log uses 4 spaces of indentation (4 + 75 &lt; 80).
+<li>The first line should be a short, concise summary of the change prefixed
+with a module name. Examples:
+<pre>
+ mesa: Add support for querying GL_VERTEX_ATTRIB_ARRAY_LONG
+
+ gallium: add PIPE_CAP_DEVICE_RESET_STATUS_QUERY
+
+ i965: Fix missing type in local variable declaration.
+</pre>
+<li>Subsequent patch comments should describe the change in more detail,
+if needed. For example:
+<pre>
+ i965: Remove end-of-thread SEND alignment code.
+
+ This was present in Eric's initial implementation of the compaction code
+ for Sandybridge (commit 077d01b6). There is no documentation saying this
+ is necessary, and removing it causes no regressions in piglit on any
+ platform.
+</pre>
+<li>A "Signed-off-by:" line is not required, but not discouraged either.
+<li>If a patch address a bugzilla issue, that should be noted in the
+patch comment. For example:
+<pre>
+ Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89689
+</pre>
+<li>If there have been several revisions to a patch during the review
+process, they should be noted such as in this example:
+<pre>
+ st/mesa: add ARB_texture_stencil8 support (v4)
+
+ if we support stencil texturing, enable texture_stencil8
+ there is no requirement to support native S8 for this,
+ the texture can be converted to x24s8 fine.
+
+ v2: fold fixes from Marek in:
+ a) put S8 last in the list
+ b) fix renderable to always test for d/s renderable
+ fixup the texture case to use a stencil only format
+ for picking the format for the texture view.
+ v3: hit fallback for getteximage
+ v4: put s8 back in front, it shouldn't get picked now (Ilia)
+</pre>
+<li>If someone tested your patch, document it with a line like this:
+<pre>
+ Tested-by: Joe Hacker &lt;jhacker@foo.com&gt;
+</pre>
+<li>If the patch was reviewed (usually the case) or acked by someone,
+that should be documented with:
+<pre>
+ Reviewed-by: Joe Hacker &lt;jhacker@foo.com&gt;
+ Acked-by: Joe Hacker &lt;jhacker@foo.com&gt;
+</pre>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+<h3>Testing Patches</h3>
+
+<p>
+It should go without saying that patches must be tested. In general,
+do whatever testing is prudent.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+You should always run the Mesa test suite before submitting patches.
+The test suite can be run using the 'make check' command. All tests
must pass before patches will be accepted, this may mean you have
to update the tests themselves.
</p>
<p>
+Whenever possible and applicable, test the patch with
+<a href="http://people.freedesktop.org/~nh/piglit/">Piglit</a> to
+check for regressions.
+</p>
+
+
+<h3>Mailing Patches</h3>
+
+<p>
Patches should be sent to the Mesa mailing list for review.
When submitting a patch make sure to use git send-email rather than attaching
patches to emails. Sending patches as attachments prevents people from being