3 files changed, 12 insertions, 119 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h
index 004c1bc95d2b..e4448e16046d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h
@@ -215,7 +215,9 @@ static inline void vivt_flush_cache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
 static inline void
 vivt_flush_cache_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
-	if (cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm)))
+	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
+
+	if (!mm || cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(mm)))
 		__cpuc_flush_user_range(start & PAGE_MASK, PAGE_ALIGN(end),
 					vma->vm_flags);
 }
@@ -223,7 +225,9 @@ vivt_flush_cache_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned
 static inline void
 vivt_flush_cache_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long user_addr, unsigned long pfn)
 {
-	if (cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm))) {
+	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
+
+	if (!mm || cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(mm))) {
 		unsigned long addr = user_addr & PAGE_MASK;
 		__cpuc_flush_user_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE, vma->vm_flags);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mutex.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mutex.h
index 93226cf23ae0..b1479fd04a95 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mutex.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mutex.h
@@ -7,121 +7,10 @@
  */
 #ifndef _ASM_MUTEX_H
 #define _ASM_MUTEX_H
-
-#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 6
-/* On pre-ARMv6 hardware the swp based implementation is the most efficient. */
-# include <asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h>
-#else
-
 /*
- * Attempting to lock a mutex on ARMv6+ can be done with a bastardized
- * atomic decrement (it is not a reliable atomic decrement but it satisfies
- * the defined semantics for our purpose, while being smaller and faster
- * than a real atomic decrement or atomic swap.  The idea is to attempt
- * decrementing the lock value only once.  If once decremented it isn't zero,
- * or if its store-back fails due to a dispute on the exclusive store, we
- * simply bail out immediately through the slow path where the lock will be
- * reattempted until it succeeds.
+ * On pre-ARMv6 hardware this results in a swp-based implementation,
+ * which is the most efficient. For ARMv6+, we emit a pair of exclusive
+ * accesses instead.
  */
-static inline void
-__mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
-{
-	int __ex_flag, __res;
-
-	__asm__ (
-
-		"ldrex	%0, [%2]	\n\t"
-		"sub	%0, %0, #1	\n\t"
-		"strex	%1, %0, [%2]	"
-
-		: "=&r" (__res), "=&r" (__ex_flag)
-		: "r" (&(count)->counter)
-		: "cc","memory" );
-
-	__res |= __ex_flag;
-	if (unlikely(__res != 0))
-		fail_fn(count);
-}
-
-static inline int
-__mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
-{
-	int __ex_flag, __res;
-
-	__asm__ (
-
-		"ldrex	%0, [%2]	\n\t"
-		"sub	%0, %0, #1	\n\t"
-		"strex	%1, %0, [%2]	"
-
-		: "=&r" (__res), "=&r" (__ex_flag)
-		: "r" (&(count)->counter)
-		: "cc","memory" );
-
-	__res |= __ex_flag;
-	if (unlikely(__res != 0))
-		__res = fail_fn(count);
-	return __res;
-}
-
-/*
- * Same trick is used for the unlock fast path. However the original value,
- * rather than the result, is used to test for success in order to have
- * better generated assembly.
- */
-static inline void
-__mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
-{
-	int __ex_flag, __res, __orig;
-
-	__asm__ (
-
-		"ldrex	%0, [%3]	\n\t"
-		"add	%1, %0, #1	\n\t"
-		"strex	%2, %1, [%3]	"
-
-		: "=&r" (__orig), "=&r" (__res), "=&r" (__ex_flag)
-		: "r" (&(count)->counter)
-		: "cc","memory" );
-
-	__orig |= __ex_flag;
-	if (unlikely(__orig != 0))
-		fail_fn(count);
-}
-
-/*
- * If the unlock was done on a contended lock, or if the unlock simply fails
- * then the mutex remains locked.
- */
-#define __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock()	1
-
-/*
- * For __mutex_fastpath_trylock we use another construct which could be
- * described as a "single value cmpxchg".
- *
- * This provides the needed trylock semantics like cmpxchg would, but it is
- * lighter and less generic than a true cmpxchg implementation.
- */
-static inline int
-__mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
-{
-	int __ex_flag, __res, __orig;
-
-	__asm__ (
-
-		"1: ldrex	%0, [%3]	\n\t"
-		"subs		%1, %0, #1	\n\t"
-		"strexeq	%2, %1, [%3]	\n\t"
-		"movlt		%0, #0		\n\t"
-		"cmpeq		%2, #0		\n\t"
-		"bgt		1b		"
-
-		: "=&r" (__orig), "=&r" (__res), "=&r" (__ex_flag)
-		: "r" (&count->counter)
-		: "cc", "memory" );
-
-	return __orig;
-}
-
-#endif
+#include <asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h>
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h
index 23ebc0c82a39..24d284a1bfc7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static const struct tagtable __tagtable_##fn __tag = { tag, fn }
 
 struct membank {
 	phys_addr_t start;
-	unsigned long size;
+	phys_addr_t size;
 	unsigned int highmem;
 };
 
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ extern struct meminfo meminfo;
 #define bank_phys_end(bank)	((bank)->start + (bank)->size)
 #define bank_phys_size(bank)	(bank)->size
 
-extern int arm_add_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size);
+extern int arm_add_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size);
 extern void early_print(const char *str, ...);
 extern void dump_machine_table(void);