diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'xc/test/xsuite/xtest/tset/XPROTO/opndsply/opndsply.m')
| -rw-r--r-- | xc/test/xsuite/xtest/tset/XPROTO/opndsply/opndsply.m | 131 |
1 files changed, 131 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/xc/test/xsuite/xtest/tset/XPROTO/opndsply/opndsply.m b/xc/test/xsuite/xtest/tset/XPROTO/opndsply/opndsply.m new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f3112ef6a --- /dev/null +++ b/xc/test/xsuite/xtest/tset/XPROTO/opndsply/opndsply.m @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +/* + * Copyright 1990, 1991 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and + * UniSoft Group Limited. + * + * Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software and + * its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, + * provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that + * both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in + * supporting documentation, and that the names of MIT and UniSoft not be + * used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the + * software without specific, written prior permission. MIT and UniSoft + * make no representations about the suitability of this software for any + * purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty. + * + * $XConsortium$ + */ +>>TITLE OpenDisplay XPROTO +>>SET startup protostartup +>>SET cleanup protocleanup +>>EXTERN +/* Touch test for OpenDisplay request */ + +/**************************************************************************** + * Copyright 1989 by Sequent Computer Systems, Inc., Portland, Oregon * + * * + * * + * All Rights Reserved * + * * + * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its * + * documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, * + * provided that the above copyright notice appears in all copies and that * + * both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in * + * supporting documentation, and that the name of Sequent not be used * + * in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution or use of the * + * software without specific, written prior permission. * + * * + * SEQUENT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE, INCLUDING * + * ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS; IN NO EVENT SHALL * + * SEQUENT BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR * + * ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, * + * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, * + * ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS * + * SOFTWARE. * + ****************************************************************************/ + +#include "Xstlib.h" + + +#define CLIENT 0 +static TestType test_type = SETUP; + +/* + intent: send an OpenDisplay request to the server and check + that the server sent an OpenDisplay reply back + input: + output: none + global input: + side effects: + methods: +*/ + +static +void +tester() +{ + int status = Create_Client_Tested(CLIENT, test_type); + + if(!status) { + switch(test_type) { + case OPEN_DISPLAY: + Log_Err("Expected connection to fail, but it didn't"); + break; + default: + Log_Err("Expected connection not to fail, but it did"); + break; + } + Exit(); + } + + Exit_OK(); +} +>>ASSERTION Good A +When a client sends a valid xname protocol request to the X server, +then the X server sends back a valid authorisation-accepted +reply to the client. +>>STRATEGY +Call library function testfunc() to do the following: +Open a connection to the X server using native byte sex. +Send a valid xname protocol request to the X server. +Verify that the X server sends back a valid authorisation-accepted reply. +Open a connection to the X server using reversed byte sex. +Send a valid xname protocol request to the X server. +Verify that the X server sends back a valid authorisation-accepted reply. +>>CODE + + test_type = GOOD; + + /* Call a library function to exercise the test code */ + testfunc(tester); + +>>ASSERTION Bad B 1 +>># Assertion changed, 11th March 1992, to expect other than valid +>># auth.-accepted reply. It's wrong to expect a valid auth.-fail +>># reply as if byte order unknown then the 2-byte major & minor +>># protocol versions can't be sent properly: client byte-sex is +>># unknown to the server. We therefore will accept anything but +>># a valid reply: nothing; connection closed or reply with first +>># byte False (0). See bug report 0223. +>># This was not noticed at initial assertion review time. +When a client sends an invalid xname protocol request to the X server, +in which the +.M byte_order +is not 0x42 or 0x6C, +then the X server does not +send back a valid authorisation-accepted reply to the client. +>>STRATEGY +Call library function testfunc() to do the following: +Open a connection to the X server. +Send an invalid xname protocol request to the X server with byte_order + other than 0x42 (and not 0x6C, either). +Verify that the X server does not send back a valid authorisation-accepted reply. +Open a connection to the X server. +Send an invalid xname protocol request to the X server with byte_order + other than 0x6C (and not 0x42, either). +Verify that the X server does not send back a valid authorisation-accepted reply. +>>CODE + + test_type = OPEN_DISPLAY; + + /* Call a library function to exercise the test code */ + testfunc(tester); |