clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c
index e5f791145bd0..874cbc91b669 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c
@@ -59,13 +59,13 @@ static u64 notrace ep93xx_read_sched_clock(void)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-cycle_t ep93xx_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *c)
+u64 ep93xx_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *c)
 {
 	u64 ret;
 
 	ret = readl(EP93XX_TIMER4_VALUE_LOW);
 	ret |= ((u64) (readl(EP93XX_TIMER4_VALUE_HIGH) & 0xff) << 32);
-	return (cycle_t) ret;
+	return (u64) ret;
 }
 
 static int ep93xx_clkevt_set_next_event(unsigned long next,