diff options
| author | Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com> | 2009-06-16 14:58:10 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com> | 2009-06-16 14:58:10 -0400 |
| commit | fb882b3da189847bc98b646faddac9e8b42aa435 (patch) | |
| tree | a3182487f10dbb0a71e7aa65c4c8f6e18f40ac74 /hw | |
| parent | b2d2af76b43d62c9be07fd736652f904632fd663 (diff) | |
EDID: Carp about 1.4 monitors with no preferred refresh rate
You would think, having finally tightened down the spec, that
monitor vendors would bother to implement what the spec actually
mandates. You would be wrong.
Diffstat (limited to 'hw')
| -rw-r--r-- | hw/xfree86/ddc/print_edid.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/ddc/print_edid.c b/hw/xfree86/ddc/print_edid.c index e16dcbb9a..c2723da68 100644 --- a/hw/xfree86/ddc/print_edid.c +++ b/hw/xfree86/ddc/print_edid.c @@ -398,8 +398,12 @@ print_detailed_monitor_section(int scrnIndex, if (r->supported_scaling & SCALING_VSTRETCH) xf86ErrorF(" vstretch"); xf86ErrorF("\n"); - xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex, X_INFO, "Preferred refresh rate: %d\n", - r->preferred_refresh); + if (r->preferred_refresh) + xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex, X_INFO, "Preferred refresh rate: %d\n", + r->preferred_refresh); + else + xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex, X_INFO, "Buggy monitor, no preferred " + "refresh rate given\n"); } else if (r->max_clock != 0) { xf86ErrorF(" PixClock max %i MHz\n", r->max_clock); } else { |