Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
atomic_t for the struct io_ev_fd references and there are no issues with
it. While the ref getting and putting for the eventfd code is somewhat
performance critical for cases where eventfd signaling is used (news
flash, you should not...), it probably doesn't warrant using an atomic_t
for this. Let's just move to it to refcount_t to get the added
protection of over/underflows.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202409082039.hnsaIJ3X-lkp@intel.com/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409082039.hnsaIJ3X-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
Fixes checkpatch warning
Signed-off-by: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240902062134.136387-2-anuj20.g@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
This is pretty nicely abstracted already, but let's move it to a separate
file rather than have it in the main io_uring file. With that, we can
also move the io_ev_fd struct and enum out of global scope.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|