summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/security/safesetid/securityfs.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2020-02-21 09:06:12 -0600
committerVasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>2020-02-27 16:02:21 +0100
commitfa226f1d81e2d3798d30eaa14550d7f35c35e6f3 (patch)
tree2063b7d5c04db419fe443d7a2aa39e1cc21cbe4e /security/safesetid/securityfs.c
parentd5d006fa0927c34fa083c8d48e33b1c30b29fd1b (diff)
s390: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200221150612.GA9717@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/safesetid/securityfs.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions