summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/ceph/msgpool.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>2018-10-15 17:38:23 +0200
committerIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>2018-10-22 10:28:22 +0200
commit0d9c1ab3be4c0187663096a6a084421d0a1e45c6 (patch)
tree06a57638913d5badd76fe695bcb4f08992f55579 /net/ceph/msgpool.c
parent26f887e0a3c43f67b550e2e5d8a76e86ca11d188 (diff)
libceph: preallocate message data items
Currently message data items are allocated with ceph_msg_data_create() in setup_request_data() inside send_request(). send_request() has never been allowed to fail, so each allocation is followed by a BUG_ON: data = ceph_msg_data_create(...); BUG_ON(!data); It's been this way since support for multiple message data items was added in commit 6644ed7b7e04 ("libceph: make message data be a pointer") in 3.10. There is no reason to delay the allocation of message data items until the last possible moment and we certainly don't need a linked list of them as they are only ever appended to the end and never erased. Make ceph_msg_new2() take max_data_items and adapt the rest of the code. Reported-by: Jerry Lee <leisurelysw24@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ceph/msgpool.c')
-rw-r--r--net/ceph/msgpool.c25
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/net/ceph/msgpool.c b/net/ceph/msgpool.c
index 3dddc074f0d7..e3ecb80cd182 100644
--- a/net/ceph/msgpool.c
+++ b/net/ceph/msgpool.c
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ static void *msgpool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, void *arg)
struct ceph_msgpool *pool = arg;
struct ceph_msg *msg;
- msg = ceph_msg_new(pool->type, pool->front_len, gfp_mask, true);
+ msg = ceph_msg_new2(pool->type, pool->front_len, pool->max_data_items,
+ gfp_mask, true);
if (!msg) {
dout("msgpool_alloc %s failed\n", pool->name);
} else {
@@ -35,11 +36,13 @@ static void msgpool_free(void *element, void *arg)
}
int ceph_msgpool_init(struct ceph_msgpool *pool, int type,
- int front_len, int size, bool blocking, const char *name)
+ int front_len, int max_data_items, int size,
+ const char *name)
{
dout("msgpool %s init\n", name);
pool->type = type;
pool->front_len = front_len;
+ pool->max_data_items = max_data_items;
pool->pool = mempool_create(size, msgpool_alloc, msgpool_free, pool);
if (!pool->pool)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -53,18 +56,21 @@ void ceph_msgpool_destroy(struct ceph_msgpool *pool)
mempool_destroy(pool->pool);
}
-struct ceph_msg *ceph_msgpool_get(struct ceph_msgpool *pool,
- int front_len)
+struct ceph_msg *ceph_msgpool_get(struct ceph_msgpool *pool, int front_len,
+ int max_data_items)
{
struct ceph_msg *msg;
- if (front_len > pool->front_len) {
- dout("msgpool_get %s need front %d, pool size is %d\n",
- pool->name, front_len, pool->front_len);
+ if (front_len > pool->front_len ||
+ max_data_items > pool->max_data_items) {
+ pr_warn_ratelimited("%s need %d/%d, pool %s has %d/%d\n",
+ __func__, front_len, max_data_items, pool->name,
+ pool->front_len, pool->max_data_items);
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
/* try to alloc a fresh message */
- return ceph_msg_new(pool->type, front_len, GFP_NOFS, false);
+ return ceph_msg_new2(pool->type, front_len, max_data_items,
+ GFP_NOFS, false);
}
msg = mempool_alloc(pool->pool, GFP_NOFS);
@@ -80,6 +86,9 @@ void ceph_msgpool_put(struct ceph_msgpool *pool, struct ceph_msg *msg)
msg->front.iov_len = pool->front_len;
msg->hdr.front_len = cpu_to_le32(pool->front_len);
+ msg->data_length = 0;
+ msg->num_data_items = 0;
+
kref_init(&msg->kref); /* retake single ref */
mempool_free(msg, pool->pool);
}