diff options
author | Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> | 2024-10-09 09:37:03 +1030 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> | 2024-10-22 16:09:44 +0200 |
commit | f10f59f91a6278e9637327d1206140d28e2d5004 (patch) | |
tree | c0ea22b5b8986b52b3dda95d223f8a980d130993 /fs | |
parent | 5f9062a48db260fd6b53d86ecfb4d5dc59266316 (diff) |
btrfs: fix the delalloc range locking if sector size < page size
Inside lock_delalloc_folios(), there are several problems related to
sector size < page size handling:
- Set the writer locks without checking if the folio is still valid
We call btrfs_folio_start_writer_lock() just like it's folio_lock().
But since the folio may not even be the folio of the current mapping,
we can easily screw up the folio->private.
- The range is not clamped inside the page
This means we can over write other bitmaps if the start/len is not
properly handled, and trigger the btrfs_subpage_assert().
- @processed_end is always rounded up to page end
If the delalloc range is not page aligned, and we need to retry
(returning -EAGAIN), then we will unlock to the page end.
Thankfully this is not a huge problem, as now
btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() can handle range larger than the locked
range, and only unlock what is already locked.
Fix all these problems by:
- Lock and check the folio first, then call
btrfs_folio_set_writer_lock()
So that if we got a folio not belonging to the inode, we won't
touch folio->private.
- Properly truncate the range inside the page
- Update @processed_end to the locked range end
Fixes: 1e1de38792e0 ("btrfs: make process_one_page() to handle subpage locking")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 17 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 309a8ae48434..872cca54cc6c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -262,22 +262,23 @@ static noinline int lock_delalloc_folios(struct inode *inode, for (i = 0; i < found_folios; i++) { struct folio *folio = fbatch.folios[i]; - u32 len = end + 1 - start; + u64 range_start; + u32 range_len; if (folio == locked_folio) continue; - if (btrfs_folio_start_writer_lock(fs_info, folio, start, - len)) - goto out; - + folio_lock(folio); if (!folio_test_dirty(folio) || folio->mapping != mapping) { - btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock(fs_info, folio, start, - len); + folio_unlock(folio); goto out; } + range_start = max_t(u64, folio_pos(folio), start); + range_len = min_t(u64, folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio), + end + 1) - range_start; + btrfs_folio_set_writer_lock(fs_info, folio, range_start, range_len); - processed_end = folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio) - 1; + processed_end = range_start + range_len - 1; } folio_batch_release(&fbatch); cond_resched(); |