diff options
| author | Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com> | 2019-09-11 10:06:29 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> | 2019-09-13 13:10:05 -0700 |
| commit | 6ce220dd2f8ea71d6afc29b9a7524c12e39f374a (patch) | |
| tree | 7ef85ee6eb7b0a19d7c4d3b9a700956876d896b9 | |
| parent | b76b4715eba0d0ed574f58918b29c1b2f0fa37a8 (diff) | |
raid5: don't set STRIPE_HANDLE to stripe which is in batch list
If stripe in batch list is set with STRIPE_HANDLE flag, then the stripe
could be set with STRIPE_ACTIVE by the handle_stripe function. And if
error happens to the batch_head at the same time, break_stripe_batch_list
is called, then below warning could happen (the same report in [1]), it
means a member of batch list was set with STRIPE_ACTIVE.
[7028915.431770] stripe state: 2001
[7028915.431815] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[7028915.431828] WARNING: CPU: 18 PID: 29089 at drivers/md/raid5.c:4614 break_stripe_batch_list+0x203/0x240 [raid456]
[...]
[7028915.431879] CPU: 18 PID: 29089 Comm: kworker/u82:5 Tainted: G O 4.14.86-1-storage #4.14.86-1.2~deb9
[7028915.431881] Hardware name: Supermicro SSG-2028R-ACR24L/X10DRH-iT, BIOS 3.1 06/18/2018
[7028915.431888] Workqueue: raid5wq raid5_do_work [raid456]
[7028915.431890] task: ffff9ab0ef36d7c0 task.stack: ffffb72926f84000
[7028915.431896] RIP: 0010:break_stripe_batch_list+0x203/0x240 [raid456]
[7028915.431898] RSP: 0018:ffffb72926f87ba8 EFLAGS: 00010286
[7028915.431900] RAX: 0000000000000012 RBX: ffff9aaa84a98000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[7028915.431901] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff9ab2bfa15458 RDI: ffff9ab2bfa15458
[7028915.431902] RBP: ffff9aaa8fb4e900 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000002eb4
[7028915.431903] R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9ab1736f1b00
[7028915.431904] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9aaa8fb4e900 R15: 0000000000000001
[7028915.431906] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ab2bfa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[7028915.431907] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[7028915.431908] CR2: 00007ff953b9f5d8 CR3: 0000000bf4009002 CR4: 00000000003606e0
[7028915.431909] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[7028915.431910] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[7028915.431910] Call Trace:
[7028915.431923] handle_stripe+0x8e7/0x2020 [raid456]
[7028915.431930] ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x89/0xc0
[7028915.431935] handle_active_stripes.isra.58+0x35f/0x560 [raid456]
[7028915.431939] raid5_do_work+0xc6/0x1f0 [raid456]
Also commit 59fc630b8b5f9f ("RAID5: batch adjacent full stripe write")
said "If a stripe is added to batch list, then only the first stripe
of the list should be put to handle_list and run handle_stripe."
So don't set STRIPE_HANDLE to stripe which is already in batch list,
otherwise the stripe could be put to handle_list and run handle_stripe,
then the above warning could be triggered.
[1]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg62552.html
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/md/raid5.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c index 8ea8443e09d5..9fc6737e9713 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c @@ -5727,7 +5727,8 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi) do_flush = false; } - set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state); + if (!sh->batch_head) + set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state); clear_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state); if ((!sh->batch_head || sh == sh->batch_head) && (bi->bi_opf & REQ_SYNC) && |