| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Commit 204c91eff798a ("KVM: selftests: do not blindly clobber registers in
guest asm") was intended to make test more gcc-proof, however, the result
is exactly the opposite: on newer gccs (e.g. 8.2.1) the test breaks with
==== Test Assertion Failure ====
x86_64/sync_regs_test.c:168: run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xBAD1DEA + 1
pid=14170 tid=14170 - Invalid argument
1 0x00000000004015b3: main at sync_regs_test.c:166 (discriminator 6)
2 0x00007f413fb66412: ?? ??:0
3 0x000000000040191d: _start at ??:?
rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x1.
Apparently, compile is still free to play games with registers even
when they have variables attached.
Re-write guest code with 'asm volatile' by embedding ucall there and
making sure rbx is preserved.
Fixes: 204c91eff798a ("KVM: selftests: do not blindly clobber registers in guest asm")
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this work is licensed under the terms of the gnu gpl version 2
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 48 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081204.624030236@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The guest_code of sync_regs_test is assuming that the compiler will not
touch %r11 outside the asm that increments it, which is a bit brittle.
Instead, we can increment a variable and use a dummy asm to ensure the
increment is not optimized away. However, we also need to use a
callee-save register or the compiler will insert a save/restore around
the vmexit, breaking the whole idea behind the test.
(Yes, "if it ain't broken...", but I would like the test to be clean
before it is copied into the upcoming s390 selftests).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
