summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>2020-10-15 20:08:28 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2020-10-16 11:11:17 -0700
commitec62d04e3fdc4ba3a7912cd7f6da1a4e787a0d75 (patch)
treea17d896fc1baf140da3c54ca28d339eaa14909fd
parentb30c59279d6891bbd583aed2e1f0cd2a73ab475a (diff)
kernel/resource: make release_mem_region_adjustable() never fail
Patch series "selective merging of system ram resources", v4. Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where possible. Resources are effectively stored in a list-based tree. Having a lot of resources not only wastes memory, it also makes traversing that tree more expensive, and makes /proc/iomem explode in size (e.g., requiring kexec-tools to manually merge resources when creating a kdump header. The current kexec-tools resource count limit does not allow for more than ~100GB of memory with a memory block size of 128MB on x86-64). Let's allow to selectively merge system ram resources by specifying a new flag for add_memory*(). Patch #5 contains a /proc/iomem example. Only tested with virtio-mem. This patch (of 8): Let's make sure splitting a resource on memory hotunplug will never fail. This will become more relevant once we merge selected System RAM resources - then, we'll trigger that case more often on memory hotunplug. In general, this function is already unlikely to fail. When we remove memory, we free up quite a lot of metadata (memmap, page tables, memory block device, etc.). The only reason it could really fail would be when injecting allocation errors. All other error cases inside release_mem_region_adjustable() seem to be sanity checks if the function would be abused in different context - let's add WARN_ON_ONCE() in these cases so we can catch them. [natechancellor@gmail.com: fix use of ternary condition in release_mem_region_adjustable] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200922060748.2452056-1-natechancellor@gmail.com Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1159 Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com> Cc: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> Cc: "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Roger Pau Monn <roger.pau@citrix.com> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200911103459.10306-2-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--include/linux/ioport.h4
-rw-r--r--kernel/resource.c49
-rw-r--r--mm/memory_hotplug.c22
3 files changed, 31 insertions, 44 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
index 6c2b06fe8beb..52a91f5fa1a3 100644
--- a/include/linux/ioport.h
+++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
@@ -248,8 +248,8 @@ extern struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *,
extern void __release_region(struct resource *, resource_size_t,
resource_size_t);
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
-extern int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *, resource_size_t,
- resource_size_t);
+extern void release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *, resource_size_t,
+ resource_size_t);
#endif
/* Wrappers for managed devices */
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index f1175ce93a1d..4c1c487abbfb 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -1258,21 +1258,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__release_region);
* assumes that all children remain in the lower address entry for
* simplicity. Enhance this logic when necessary.
*/
-int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
- resource_size_t start, resource_size_t size)
+void release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
+ resource_size_t start, resource_size_t size)
{
+ struct resource *new_res = NULL;
+ bool alloc_nofail = false;
struct resource **p;
struct resource *res;
- struct resource *new_res;
resource_size_t end;
- int ret = -EINVAL;
end = start + size - 1;
- if ((start < parent->start) || (end > parent->end))
- return ret;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE((start < parent->start) || (end > parent->end)))
+ return;
- /* The alloc_resource() result gets checked later */
- new_res = alloc_resource(GFP_KERNEL);
+ /*
+ * We free up quite a lot of memory on memory hotunplug (esp., memap),
+ * just before releasing the region. This is highly unlikely to
+ * fail - let's play save and make it never fail as the caller cannot
+ * perform any error handling (e.g., trying to re-add memory will fail
+ * similarly).
+ */
+retry:
+ new_res = alloc_resource(GFP_KERNEL | (alloc_nofail ? __GFP_NOFAIL : 0));
p = &parent->child;
write_lock(&resource_lock);
@@ -1298,7 +1305,6 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
* so if we are dealing with them, let us just back off here.
*/
if (!(res->flags & IORESOURCE_SYSRAM)) {
- ret = 0;
break;
}
@@ -1315,20 +1321,23 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
/* free the whole entry */
*p = res->sibling;
free_resource(res);
- ret = 0;
} else if (res->start == start && res->end != end) {
/* adjust the start */
- ret = __adjust_resource(res, end + 1,
- res->end - end);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(__adjust_resource(res, end + 1,
+ res->end - end));
} else if (res->start != start && res->end == end) {
/* adjust the end */
- ret = __adjust_resource(res, res->start,
- start - res->start);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(__adjust_resource(res, res->start,
+ start - res->start));
} else {
- /* split into two entries */
+ /* split into two entries - we need a new resource */
if (!new_res) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- break;
+ new_res = alloc_resource(GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!new_res) {
+ alloc_nofail = true;
+ write_unlock(&resource_lock);
+ goto retry;
+ }
}
new_res->name = res->name;
new_res->start = end + 1;
@@ -1339,9 +1348,8 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
new_res->sibling = res->sibling;
new_res->child = NULL;
- ret = __adjust_resource(res, res->start,
- start - res->start);
- if (ret)
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(__adjust_resource(res, res->start,
+ start - res->start)))
break;
res->sibling = new_res;
new_res = NULL;
@@ -1352,7 +1360,6 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
write_unlock(&resource_lock);
free_resource(new_res);
- return ret;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 1b40eebae3e4..5d9c41ec0556 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1727,26 +1727,6 @@ void try_offline_node(int nid)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_offline_node);
-static void __release_memory_resource(resource_size_t start,
- resource_size_t size)
-{
- int ret;
-
- /*
- * When removing memory in the same granularity as it was added,
- * this function never fails. It might only fail if resources
- * have to be adjusted or split. We'll ignore the error, as
- * removing of memory cannot fail.
- */
- ret = release_mem_region_adjustable(&iomem_resource, start, size);
- if (ret) {
- resource_size_t endres = start + size - 1;
-
- pr_warn("Unable to release resource <%pa-%pa> (%d)\n",
- &start, &endres, ret);
- }
-}
-
static int __ref try_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
{
int rc = 0;
@@ -1780,7 +1760,7 @@ static int __ref try_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
memblock_remove(start, size);
}
- __release_memory_resource(start, size);
+ release_mem_region_adjustable(&iomem_resource, start, size);
try_offline_node(nid);