diff options
author | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> | 2016-02-11 17:31:12 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2016-03-09 14:41:00 +0100 |
commit | 49f18560f8bac5315047edfb673dd13d56cbcbc9 (patch) | |
tree | 994561aa9879b8392b460bbf4cd969dacbd7ffe5 /drivers/cpufreq | |
parent | 69cee7147b4a4ea02085d571cd2d9974d4a4d8d5 (diff) |
cpufreq: Call __cpufreq_governor() with policy->rwsem held
The cpufreq core code is not consistent with respect to invoking
__cpufreq_governor() under policy->rwsem.
Changing all code to always hold policy->rwsem around
__cpufreq_governor() invocations will allow us to remove
cpufreq_governor_lock that is used today because we can't
guarantee that __cpufreq_governor() isn't executed twice in
parallel for the same policy.
We should also ensure that policy->rwsem is held across governor
state changes.
For example, while adding a CPU to the policy in the CPU online path,
we need to stop the governor, change policy->cpus, start the governor
and then refresh its limits. The complete sequence must be guaranteed
to complete without interruptions by concurrent governor state
updates. That can be achieved by holding policy->rwsem around those
sequences of operations.
Also note that after this patch cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu() and
->exit() will get called under policy->rwsem which wasn't the case
earlier. That shouldn't have any side effects, though.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Tested-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 49 |
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index f65553dc48c9..692876892457 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1049,30 +1049,29 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cp if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus)) return 0; + down_write(&policy->rwsem); if (has_target()) { ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP); if (ret) { pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor\n", __func__); - return ret; + goto unlock; } } - down_write(&policy->rwsem); cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus); - up_write(&policy->rwsem); if (has_target()) { ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START); if (!ret) ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS); - if (ret) { + if (ret) pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__); - return ret; - } } - return 0; +unlock: + up_write(&policy->rwsem); + return ret; } static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu) @@ -1375,13 +1374,13 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu) return; } + down_write(&policy->rwsem); if (has_target()) { ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP); if (ret) pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor\n", __func__); } - down_write(&policy->rwsem); cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus); if (policy_is_inactive(policy)) { @@ -1394,7 +1393,6 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu) /* Nominate new CPU */ policy->cpu = cpumask_any(policy->cpus); } - up_write(&policy->rwsem); /* Start governor again for active policy */ if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) { @@ -1407,7 +1405,7 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu) pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__); } - return; + goto unlock; } if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu) @@ -1429,6 +1427,9 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu) cpufreq_driver->exit(policy); policy->freq_table = NULL; } + +unlock: + up_write(&policy->rwsem); } /** @@ -1625,6 +1626,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_generic_suspend); void cpufreq_suspend(void) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy; + int ret; if (!cpufreq_driver) return; @@ -1635,7 +1637,11 @@ void cpufreq_suspend(void) pr_debug("%s: Suspending Governors\n", __func__); for_each_active_policy(policy) { - if (__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP)) + down_write(&policy->rwsem); + ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP); + up_write(&policy->rwsem); + + if (ret) pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor for policy: %p\n", __func__, policy); else if (cpufreq_driver->suspend @@ -1657,6 +1663,7 @@ suspend: void cpufreq_resume(void) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy; + int ret; if (!cpufreq_driver) return; @@ -1669,13 +1676,20 @@ void cpufreq_resume(void) pr_debug("%s: Resuming Governors\n", __func__); for_each_active_policy(policy) { - if (cpufreq_driver->resume && cpufreq_driver->resume(policy)) + if (cpufreq_driver->resume && cpufreq_driver->resume(policy)) { pr_err("%s: Failed to resume driver: %p\n", __func__, policy); - else if (__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START) - || __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS)) - pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor for policy: %p\n", - __func__, policy); + } else { + down_write(&policy->rwsem); + ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START); + if (!ret) + __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS); + up_write(&policy->rwsem); + + if (ret) + pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor for policy: %p\n", + __func__, policy); + } } /* @@ -2326,8 +2340,11 @@ static int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(int state) __func__); break; } + + down_write(&policy->rwsem); policy->user_policy.max = policy->max; __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS); + up_write(&policy->rwsem); } } |