diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org> | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org> | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 |
commit | 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 (patch) | |
tree | 0bba044c4ce775e45a88a51686b5d9f90697ea9d /Documentation/SecurityBugs |
Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/SecurityBugs')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/SecurityBugs | 38 |
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/SecurityBugs b/Documentation/SecurityBugs new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..26c3b3635d9f --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/SecurityBugs @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +Linux kernel developers take security very seriously. As such, we'd +like to know when a security bug is found so that it can be fixed and +disclosed as quickly as possible. Please report security bugs to the +Linux kernel security team. + +1) Contact + +The Linux kernel security team can be contacted by email at +<security@kernel.org>. This is a private list of security officers +who will help verify the bug report and develop and release a fix. +It is possible that the security team will bring in extra help from +area maintainers to understand and fix the security vulnerability. + +As it is with any bug, the more information provided the easier it +will be to diagnose and fix. Please review the procedure outlined in +REPORTING-BUGS if you are unclear about what information is helpful. +Any exploit code is very helpful and will not be released without +consent from the reporter unless it has already been made public. + +2) Disclosure + +The goal of the Linux kernel security team is to work with the +bug submitter to bug resolution as well as disclosure. We prefer +to fully disclose the bug as soon as possible. It is reasonable to +delay disclosure when the bug or the fix is not yet fully understood, +the solution is not well-tested or for vendor coordination. However, we +expect these delays to be short, measurable in days, not weeks or months. +A disclosure date is negotiated by the security team working with the +bug submitter as well as vendors. However, the kernel security team +holds the final say when setting a disclosure date. The timeframe for +disclosure is from immediate (esp. if it's already publically known) +to a few weeks. As a basic default policy, we expect report date to +disclosure date to be on the order of 7 days. + +3) Non-disclosure agreements + +The Linux kernel security team is not a formal body and therefore unable +to enter any non-disclosure agreements. |