summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/smc/af_smc.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>2022-01-26 23:33:04 +0800
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2022-01-31 11:07:13 +0000
commit341adeec9adad0874f29a0a1af35638207352a39 (patch)
treebfe9bc5f0ef8d15aa44e177d1fa37bc9970d0099 /net/smc/af_smc.c
parent6449520391dfc3d2cef134f11a91251a054ff7d0 (diff)
net/smc: Forward wakeup to smc socket waitqueue after fallback
When we replace TCP with SMC and a fallback occurs, there may be some socket waitqueue entries remaining in smc socket->wq, such as eppoll_entries inserted by userspace applications. After the fallback, data flows over TCP/IP and only clcsocket->wq will be woken up. Applications can't be notified by the entries which were inserted in smc socket->wq before fallback. So we need a mechanism to wake up smc socket->wq at the same time if some entries remaining in it. The current workaround is to transfer the entries from smc socket->wq to clcsock->wq during the fallback. But this may cause a crash like this: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000100: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 5.16.0+ #107 RIP: 0010:__wake_up_common+0x65/0x170 Call Trace: <IRQ> __wake_up_common_lock+0x7a/0xc0 sock_def_readable+0x3c/0x70 tcp_data_queue+0x4a7/0xc40 tcp_rcv_established+0x32f/0x660 ? sk_filter_trim_cap+0xcb/0x2e0 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x10b/0x260 tcp_v4_rcv+0xd2a/0xde0 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x3b/0x1d0 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x54/0x60 ip_local_deliver+0x6a/0x110 ? tcp_v4_early_demux+0xa2/0x140 ? tcp_v4_early_demux+0x10d/0x140 ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x49/0x60 ip_sublist_rcv+0x19d/0x230 ip_list_rcv+0x13e/0x170 __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x1c2/0x240 netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1e6/0x320 napi_complete_done+0x11d/0x190 mlx5e_napi_poll+0x163/0x6b0 [mlx5_core] __napi_poll+0x3c/0x1b0 net_rx_action+0x27c/0x300 __do_softirq+0x114/0x2d2 irq_exit_rcu+0xb4/0xe0 common_interrupt+0xba/0xe0 </IRQ> <TASK> The crash is caused by privately transferring waitqueue entries from smc socket->wq to clcsock->wq. The owners of these entries, such as epoll, have no idea that the entries have been transferred to a different socket wait queue and still use original waitqueue spinlock (smc socket->wq.wait.lock) to make the entries operation exclusive, but it doesn't work. The operations to the entries, such as removing from the waitqueue (now is clcsock->wq after fallback), may cause a crash when clcsock waitqueue is being iterated over at the moment. This patch tries to fix this by no longer transferring wait queue entries privately, but introducing own implementations of clcsock's callback functions in fallback situation. The callback functions will forward the wakeup to smc socket->wq if clcsock->wq is actually woken up and smc socket->wq has remaining entries. Fixes: 2153bd1e3d3d ("net/smc: Transfer remaining wait queue entries during fallback") Suggested-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/smc/af_smc.c')
-rw-r--r--net/smc/af_smc.c133
1 files changed, 118 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index d5ea62b82bb8..8c89d0b0ca18 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -566,17 +566,115 @@ static void smc_stat_fallback(struct smc_sock *smc)
mutex_unlock(&net->smc.mutex_fback_rsn);
}
+/* must be called under rcu read lock */
+static void smc_fback_wakeup_waitqueue(struct smc_sock *smc, void *key)
+{
+ struct socket_wq *wq;
+ __poll_t flags;
+
+ wq = rcu_dereference(smc->sk.sk_wq);
+ if (!skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ return;
+
+ /* wake up smc sk->sk_wq */
+ if (!key) {
+ /* sk_state_change */
+ wake_up_interruptible_all(&wq->wait);
+ } else {
+ flags = key_to_poll(key);
+ if (flags & (EPOLLIN | EPOLLOUT))
+ /* sk_data_ready or sk_write_space */
+ wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, flags);
+ else if (flags & EPOLLERR)
+ /* sk_error_report */
+ wake_up_interruptible_poll(&wq->wait, flags);
+ }
+}
+
+static int smc_fback_mark_woken(wait_queue_entry_t *wait,
+ unsigned int mode, int sync, void *key)
+{
+ struct smc_mark_woken *mark =
+ container_of(wait, struct smc_mark_woken, wait_entry);
+
+ mark->woken = true;
+ mark->key = key;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void smc_fback_forward_wakeup(struct smc_sock *smc, struct sock *clcsk,
+ void (*clcsock_callback)(struct sock *sk))
+{
+ struct smc_mark_woken mark = { .woken = false };
+ struct socket_wq *wq;
+
+ init_waitqueue_func_entry(&mark.wait_entry,
+ smc_fback_mark_woken);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ wq = rcu_dereference(clcsk->sk_wq);
+ if (!wq)
+ goto out;
+ add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(clcsk), &mark.wait_entry);
+ clcsock_callback(clcsk);
+ remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(clcsk), &mark.wait_entry);
+
+ if (mark.woken)
+ smc_fback_wakeup_waitqueue(smc, mark.key);
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+static void smc_fback_state_change(struct sock *clcsk)
+{
+ struct smc_sock *smc =
+ smc_clcsock_user_data(clcsk);
+
+ if (!smc)
+ return;
+ smc_fback_forward_wakeup(smc, clcsk, smc->clcsk_state_change);
+}
+
+static void smc_fback_data_ready(struct sock *clcsk)
+{
+ struct smc_sock *smc =
+ smc_clcsock_user_data(clcsk);
+
+ if (!smc)
+ return;
+ smc_fback_forward_wakeup(smc, clcsk, smc->clcsk_data_ready);
+}
+
+static void smc_fback_write_space(struct sock *clcsk)
+{
+ struct smc_sock *smc =
+ smc_clcsock_user_data(clcsk);
+
+ if (!smc)
+ return;
+ smc_fback_forward_wakeup(smc, clcsk, smc->clcsk_write_space);
+}
+
+static void smc_fback_error_report(struct sock *clcsk)
+{
+ struct smc_sock *smc =
+ smc_clcsock_user_data(clcsk);
+
+ if (!smc)
+ return;
+ smc_fback_forward_wakeup(smc, clcsk, smc->clcsk_error_report);
+}
+
static int smc_switch_to_fallback(struct smc_sock *smc, int reason_code)
{
- wait_queue_head_t *smc_wait = sk_sleep(&smc->sk);
- wait_queue_head_t *clc_wait;
- unsigned long flags;
+ struct sock *clcsk;
mutex_lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
if (!smc->clcsock) {
mutex_unlock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
return -EBADF;
}
+ clcsk = smc->clcsock->sk;
+
smc->use_fallback = true;
smc->fallback_rsn = reason_code;
smc_stat_fallback(smc);
@@ -587,16 +685,22 @@ static int smc_switch_to_fallback(struct smc_sock *smc, int reason_code)
smc->clcsock->wq.fasync_list =
smc->sk.sk_socket->wq.fasync_list;
- /* There may be some entries remaining in
- * smc socket->wq, which should be removed
- * to clcsocket->wq during the fallback.
+ /* There might be some wait entries remaining
+ * in smc sk->sk_wq and they should be woken up
+ * as clcsock's wait queue is woken up.
*/
- clc_wait = sk_sleep(smc->clcsock->sk);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&smc_wait->lock, flags);
- spin_lock_nested(&clc_wait->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
- list_splice_init(&smc_wait->head, &clc_wait->head);
- spin_unlock(&clc_wait->lock);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smc_wait->lock, flags);
+ smc->clcsk_state_change = clcsk->sk_state_change;
+ smc->clcsk_data_ready = clcsk->sk_data_ready;
+ smc->clcsk_write_space = clcsk->sk_write_space;
+ smc->clcsk_error_report = clcsk->sk_error_report;
+
+ clcsk->sk_state_change = smc_fback_state_change;
+ clcsk->sk_data_ready = smc_fback_data_ready;
+ clcsk->sk_write_space = smc_fback_write_space;
+ clcsk->sk_error_report = smc_fback_error_report;
+
+ smc->clcsock->sk->sk_user_data =
+ (void *)((uintptr_t)smc | SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY);
}
mutex_unlock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
return 0;
@@ -2115,10 +2219,9 @@ out:
static void smc_clcsock_data_ready(struct sock *listen_clcsock)
{
- struct smc_sock *lsmc;
+ struct smc_sock *lsmc =
+ smc_clcsock_user_data(listen_clcsock);
- lsmc = (struct smc_sock *)
- ((uintptr_t)listen_clcsock->sk_user_data & ~SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY);
if (!lsmc)
return;
lsmc->clcsk_data_ready(listen_clcsock);