diff options
| author | Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> | 2024-08-19 21:45:27 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> | 2024-08-20 17:40:13 -0700 |
| commit | 1c1f721375989579e46741f59523e39ec9b2a9bd (patch) | |
| tree | 2444bbe7fab7abad9a47801f61a7f6bc69cb65f4 /net/mptcp | |
| parent | 322ea3778965da72862cca2a0c50253aacf65fe6 (diff) | |
mptcp: pm: only decrement add_addr_accepted for MPJ req
Adding the following warning ...
WARN_ON_ONCE(msk->pm.add_addr_accepted == 0)
... before decrementing the add_addr_accepted counter helped to find a
bug when running the "remove single subflow" subtest from the
mptcp_join.sh selftest.
Removing a 'subflow' endpoint will first trigger a RM_ADDR, then the
subflow closure. Before this patch, and upon the reception of the
RM_ADDR, the other peer will then try to decrement this
add_addr_accepted. That's not correct because the attached subflows have
not been created upon the reception of an ADD_ADDR.
A way to solve that is to decrement the counter only if the attached
subflow was an MP_JOIN to a remote id that was not 0, and initiated by
the host receiving the RM_ADDR.
Fixes: d0876b2284cf ("mptcp: add the incoming RM_ADDR support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240819-net-mptcp-pm-reusing-id-v1-9-38035d40de5b@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/mptcp')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c index 4cf7cc851f80..882781571c7b 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk, mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow); spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); - removed = true; + removed |= subflow->request_join; if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW) __MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), rm_type); } @@ -843,7 +843,11 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk, if (!mptcp_pm_is_kernel(msk)) continue; - if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR) { + if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR && rm_id && + !WARN_ON_ONCE(msk->pm.add_addr_accepted == 0)) { + /* Note: if the subflow has been closed before, this + * add_addr_accepted counter will not be decremented. + */ msk->pm.add_addr_accepted--; WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, true); } |