diff options
author | Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> | 2021-11-05 18:40:14 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2021-11-06 12:54:12 -0700 |
commit | 3990ed4c426652fcd469f8c9dc08156294b36c28 (patch) | |
tree | 006847e26b35c8539e01081b8842dbb79c3fb580 /kernel | |
parent | 70bf363d7adb3a428773bc905011d0ff923ba747 (diff) |
bpf: Stop caching subprog index in the bpf_pseudo_func insn
This patch is to fix an out-of-bound access issue when jit-ing the
bpf_pseudo_func insn (i.e. ld_imm64 with src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC)
In jit_subprog(), it currently reuses the subprog index cached in
insn[1].imm. This subprog index is an index into a few array related
to subprogs. For example, in jit_subprog(), it is an index to the newly
allocated 'struct bpf_prog **func' array.
The subprog index was cached in insn[1].imm after add_subprog(). However,
this could become outdated (and too big in this case) if some subprogs
are completely removed during dead code elimination (in
adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove). The cached index in insn[1].imm
is not updated accordingly and causing out-of-bound issue in the later
jit_subprog().
Unlike bpf_pseudo_'func' insn, the current bpf_pseudo_'call' insn
is handling the DCE properly by calling find_subprog(insn->imm) to
figure out the index instead of caching the subprog index.
The existing bpf_adj_branches() will adjust the insn->imm
whenever insn is added or removed.
Instead of having two ways handling subprog index,
this patch is to make bpf_pseudo_func works more like
bpf_pseudo_call.
First change is to stop caching the subprog index result
in insn[1].imm after add_subprog(). The verification
process will use find_subprog(insn->imm) to figure
out the subprog index.
Second change is in bpf_adj_branches() and have it to
adjust the insn->imm for the bpf_pseudo_func insn also
whenever insn is added or removed.
Third change is in jit_subprog(). Like the bpf_pseudo_call handling,
bpf_pseudo_func temporarily stores the find_subprog() result
in insn->off. It is fine because the prog's insn has been finalized
at this point. insn->off will be reset back to 0 later to avoid
confusing the userspace prog dump tool.
Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211106014014.651018-1-kafai@fb.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/core.c | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 37 |
2 files changed, 21 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 327e3996eadb..2405e39d800f 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -390,6 +390,13 @@ static int bpf_adj_branches(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 pos, s32 end_old, i = end_new; insn = prog->insnsi + end_old; } + if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn)) { + ret = bpf_adj_delta_to_imm(insn, pos, end_old, + end_new, i, probe_pass); + if (ret) + return ret; + continue; + } code = insn->code; if ((BPF_CLASS(code) != BPF_JMP && BPF_CLASS(code) != BPF_JMP32) || diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 5f8d9128860a..890b3ec375a3 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -240,12 +240,6 @@ static bool bpf_pseudo_kfunc_call(const struct bpf_insn *insn) insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL; } -static bool bpf_pseudo_func(const struct bpf_insn *insn) -{ - return insn->code == (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW) && - insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC; -} - struct bpf_call_arg_meta { struct bpf_map *map_ptr; bool raw_mode; @@ -1960,16 +1954,10 @@ static int add_subprog_and_kfunc(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return -EPERM; } - if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn)) { + if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn) || bpf_pseudo_call(insn)) ret = add_subprog(env, i + insn->imm + 1); - if (ret >= 0) - /* remember subprog */ - insn[1].imm = ret; - } else if (bpf_pseudo_call(insn)) { - ret = add_subprog(env, i + insn->imm + 1); - } else { + else ret = add_kfunc_call(env, insn->imm, insn->off); - } if (ret < 0) return ret; @@ -9387,7 +9375,8 @@ static int check_ld_imm(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC) { struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = env->prog->aux; - u32 subprogno = insn[1].imm; + u32 subprogno = find_subprog(env, + env->insn_idx + insn->imm + 1); if (!aux->func_info) { verbose(env, "missing btf func_info\n"); @@ -12557,14 +12546,9 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return 0; for (i = 0, insn = prog->insnsi; i < prog->len; i++, insn++) { - if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn)) { - env->insn_aux_data[i].call_imm = insn->imm; - /* subprog is encoded in insn[1].imm */ + if (!bpf_pseudo_func(insn) && !bpf_pseudo_call(insn)) continue; - } - if (!bpf_pseudo_call(insn)) - continue; /* Upon error here we cannot fall back to interpreter but * need a hard reject of the program. Thus -EFAULT is * propagated in any case. @@ -12585,6 +12569,12 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) env->insn_aux_data[i].call_imm = insn->imm; /* point imm to __bpf_call_base+1 from JITs point of view */ insn->imm = 1; + if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn)) + /* jit (e.g. x86_64) may emit fewer instructions + * if it learns a u32 imm is the same as a u64 imm. + * Force a non zero here. + */ + insn[1].imm = 1; } err = bpf_prog_alloc_jited_linfo(prog); @@ -12669,7 +12659,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) insn = func[i]->insnsi; for (j = 0; j < func[i]->len; j++, insn++) { if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn)) { - subprog = insn[1].imm; + subprog = insn->off; insn[0].imm = (u32)(long)func[subprog]->bpf_func; insn[1].imm = ((u64)(long)func[subprog]->bpf_func) >> 32; continue; @@ -12720,7 +12710,8 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) for (i = 0, insn = prog->insnsi; i < prog->len; i++, insn++) { if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn)) { insn[0].imm = env->insn_aux_data[i].call_imm; - insn[1].imm = find_subprog(env, i + insn[0].imm + 1); + insn[1].imm = insn->off; + insn->off = 0; continue; } if (!bpf_pseudo_call(insn)) |