diff options
author | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2017-08-15 09:50:13 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2017-08-18 12:35:02 +0200 |
commit | 7edaeb6841dfb27e362288ab8466ebdc4972e867 (patch) | |
tree | 419ce3f71f7ffc17131bb911fb16ff037e3c6bb1 /kernel/watchdog_hld.c | |
parent | ef954844c7ace62f773f4f23e28d2d915adc419f (diff) |
kernel/watchdog: Prevent false positives with turbo modes
The hardlockup detector on x86 uses a performance counter based on unhalted
CPU cycles and a periodic hrtimer. The hrtimer period is about 2/5 of the
performance counter period, so the hrtimer should fire 2-3 times before the
performance counter NMI fires. The NMI code checks whether the hrtimer
fired since the last invocation. If not, it assumess a hard lockup.
The calculation of those periods is based on the nominal CPU
frequency. Turbo modes increase the CPU clock frequency and therefore
shorten the period of the perf/NMI watchdog. With extreme Turbo-modes (3x
nominal frequency) the perf/NMI period is shorter than the hrtimer period
which leads to false positives.
A simple fix would be to shorten the hrtimer period, but that comes with
the side effect of more frequent hrtimer and softlockup thread wakeups,
which is not desired.
Implement a low pass filter, which checks the perf/NMI period against
kernel time. If the perf/NMI fires before 4/5 of the watchdog period has
elapsed then the event is ignored and postponed to the next perf/NMI.
That solves the problem and avoids the overhead of shorter hrtimer periods
and more frequent softlockup thread wakeups.
Fixes: 58687acba592 ("lockup_detector: Combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup detector")
Reported-and-tested-by: Kan Liang <Kan.liang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dzickus@redhat.com
Cc: prarit@redhat.com
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com
Cc: babu.moger@oracle.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: eranian@google.com
Cc: acme@redhat.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: atomlin@redhat.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1708150931310.1886@nanos
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/watchdog_hld.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/watchdog_hld.c | 59 |
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog_hld.c b/kernel/watchdog_hld.c index 295a0d84934c..3a09ea1b1d3d 100644 --- a/kernel/watchdog_hld.c +++ b/kernel/watchdog_hld.c @@ -37,6 +37,62 @@ void arch_touch_nmi_watchdog(void) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_touch_nmi_watchdog); +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_CHECK_TIMESTAMP +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(ktime_t, last_timestamp); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nmi_rearmed); +static ktime_t watchdog_hrtimer_sample_threshold __read_mostly; + +void watchdog_update_hrtimer_threshold(u64 period) +{ + /* + * The hrtimer runs with a period of (watchdog_threshold * 2) / 5 + * + * So it runs effectively with 2.5 times the rate of the NMI + * watchdog. That means the hrtimer should fire 2-3 times before + * the NMI watchdog expires. The NMI watchdog on x86 is based on + * unhalted CPU cycles, so if Turbo-Mode is enabled the CPU cycles + * might run way faster than expected and the NMI fires in a + * smaller period than the one deduced from the nominal CPU + * frequency. Depending on the Turbo-Mode factor this might be fast + * enough to get the NMI period smaller than the hrtimer watchdog + * period and trigger false positives. + * + * The sample threshold is used to check in the NMI handler whether + * the minimum time between two NMI samples has elapsed. That + * prevents false positives. + * + * Set this to 4/5 of the actual watchdog threshold period so the + * hrtimer is guaranteed to fire at least once within the real + * watchdog threshold. + */ + watchdog_hrtimer_sample_threshold = period * 2; +} + +static bool watchdog_check_timestamp(void) +{ + ktime_t delta, now = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns(); + + delta = now - __this_cpu_read(last_timestamp); + if (delta < watchdog_hrtimer_sample_threshold) { + /* + * If ktime is jiffies based, a stalled timer would prevent + * jiffies from being incremented and the filter would look + * at a stale timestamp and never trigger. + */ + if (__this_cpu_inc_return(nmi_rearmed) < 10) + return false; + } + __this_cpu_write(nmi_rearmed, 0); + __this_cpu_write(last_timestamp, now); + return true; +} +#else +static inline bool watchdog_check_timestamp(void) +{ + return true; +} +#endif + static struct perf_event_attr wd_hw_attr = { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES, @@ -61,6 +117,9 @@ static void watchdog_overflow_callback(struct perf_event *event, return; } + if (!watchdog_check_timestamp()) + return; + /* check for a hardlockup * This is done by making sure our timer interrupt * is incrementing. The timer interrupt should have |