summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>2024-11-22 16:19:16 +0000
committerThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>2024-11-28 15:22:20 +0100
commit6965f91a000a24b2c25480a92696a007545d97ec (patch)
treec876ccceee0e979eac86015c29d7ef4f580acf76 /drivers/gpu/drm
parentece45026b057edb91bc2a38f0be05309b2b13ba6 (diff)
drm/xe/guc_submit: fix race around pending_disable
Currently in some testcases we can trigger: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: SCHED_DONE: Unexpected engine state 0x02b1, guc_id=8, runnable_state=0 [drm] *ERROR* GT0: G2H action 0x1002 failed (-EPROTO) len 3 msg 02 10 00 90 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Looking at a snippet of corresponding ftrace for this GuC id we can see: 498.852891: xe_sched_msg_add: dev=0000:03:00.0, gt=0 guc_id=8, opcode=3 498.854083: xe_sched_msg_recv: dev=0000:03:00.0, gt=0 guc_id=8, opcode=3 498.855389: xe_exec_queue_kill: dev=0000:03:00.0, 5:0x1, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=8, guc_state=0x3, flags=0x0 498.855436: xe_exec_queue_lr_cleanup: dev=0000:03:00.0, 5:0x1, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=8, guc_state=0x83, flags=0x0 498.856767: xe_exec_queue_close: dev=0000:03:00.0, 5:0x1, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=8, guc_state=0x83, flags=0x0 498.862889: xe_exec_queue_scheduling_disable: dev=0000:03:00.0, 5:0x1, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=8, guc_state=0xa9, flags=0x0 498.863032: xe_exec_queue_scheduling_disable: dev=0000:03:00.0, 5:0x1, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=8, guc_state=0x2b9, flags=0x0 498.875596: xe_exec_queue_scheduling_done: dev=0000:03:00.0, 5:0x1, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=8, guc_state=0x2b9, flags=0x0 498.875604: xe_exec_queue_deregister: dev=0000:03:00.0, 5:0x1, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=8, guc_state=0x2b1, flags=0x0 499.074483: xe_exec_queue_deregister_done: dev=0000:03:00.0, 5:0x1, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=8, guc_state=0x2b1, flags=0x0 This looks to be the two scheduling_disable racing with each other, one from the suspend (opcode=3) and then again during lr cleanup. While those two operations are serialized, the G2H portion is not, therefore when marking the queue as pending_disabled and then firing off the first request, we proceed do the same again, however the first disable response only fires after this which then clears the pending_disabled. At this point the second comes back and is processed, however the pending_disabled is no longer set, hence triggering the warning. To fix this wait for pending_disabled when doing the lr cleanup and calling disable_scheduling_deregister. Also do the same for all other disable_scheduling callers. Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/3515 Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+ Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <mattheq.brost@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241122161914.321263-5-matthew.auld@intel.com (cherry picked from commit ddb106d2120a0bf1c5ff87c71d059d193814da41) Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c17
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
index 7afcc243037c..ebc85d98b025 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
@@ -769,17 +769,19 @@ static void disable_scheduling_deregister(struct xe_guc *guc,
struct xe_exec_queue *q)
{
MAKE_SCHED_CONTEXT_ACTION(q, DISABLE);
- struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
int ret;
set_min_preemption_timeout(guc, q);
smp_rmb();
- ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq, !exec_queue_pending_enable(q) ||
- xe_guc_read_stopped(guc), HZ * 5);
+ ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
+ (!exec_queue_pending_enable(q) &&
+ !exec_queue_pending_disable(q)) ||
+ xe_guc_read_stopped(guc),
+ HZ * 5);
if (!ret) {
struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
- drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Pending enable failed to respond");
+ xe_gt_warn(q->gt, "Pending enable/disable failed to respond\n");
xe_sched_submission_start(sched);
xe_gt_reset_async(q->gt);
xe_sched_tdr_queue_imm(sched);
@@ -1101,7 +1103,8 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job *drm_job)
* modifying state
*/
ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
- !exec_queue_pending_enable(q) ||
+ (!exec_queue_pending_enable(q) &&
+ !exec_queue_pending_disable(q)) ||
xe_guc_read_stopped(guc), HZ * 5);
if (!ret || xe_guc_read_stopped(guc))
goto trigger_reset;
@@ -1330,8 +1333,8 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && !exec_queue_suspended(q) &&
exec_queue_enabled(q)) {
- wait_event(guc->ct.wq, q->guc->resume_time != RESUME_PENDING ||
- xe_guc_read_stopped(guc));
+ wait_event(guc->ct.wq, (q->guc->resume_time != RESUME_PENDING ||
+ xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) && !exec_queue_pending_disable(q));
if (!xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) {
s64 since_resume_ms =