summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>2016-05-20 11:54:06 +0100
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2016-05-20 13:43:00 +0100
commit85d1225ec066b2ef46fbd0ed1bae78ae1f3e6c91 (patch)
tree249529f6b6dd1ed857d890771caca91bfd8aa9c9 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c
parentb338fa473e16c9be208b0aec7ec4e710a8a5f9ee (diff)
drm/i915: Introduce & use new lightweight SGL iterators
The existing for_each_sg_page() iterator is somewhat heavyweight, and is limiting i915 driver performance in a few benchmarks. So here we introduce somewhat lighter weight iterators, primarily for use with GEM objects or other case where we need only deal with whole aligned pages. Unlike the old iterator, the new iterators use an internal state structure which is not intended to be accessed by the caller; instead each takes as a parameter an output variable which is set before each iteration. This makes them particularly simple to use :) One of the new iterators provides the caller with the DMA address of each page in turn; the other provides the 'struct page' pointer required by many memory management operations. Various uses of for_each_sg_page() are then converted to the new macros. v2: Force inlining of the sg_iter constructor and make the union anonymous. Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463741647-15666-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c14
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c
index a2b938ec01a7..2b6bdc267fb5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c
@@ -745,15 +745,15 @@ i915_gem_swizzle_page(struct page *page)
void
i915_gem_object_do_bit_17_swizzle(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
- struct sg_page_iter sg_iter;
+ struct sgt_iter sgt_iter;
+ struct page *page;
int i;
if (obj->bit_17 == NULL)
return;
i = 0;
- for_each_sg_page(obj->pages->sgl, &sg_iter, obj->pages->nents, 0) {
- struct page *page = sg_page_iter_page(&sg_iter);
+ for_each_sgt_page(page, sgt_iter, obj->pages) {
char new_bit_17 = page_to_phys(page) >> 17;
if ((new_bit_17 & 0x1) !=
(test_bit(i, obj->bit_17) != 0)) {
@@ -775,7 +775,8 @@ i915_gem_object_do_bit_17_swizzle(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
void
i915_gem_object_save_bit_17_swizzle(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
- struct sg_page_iter sg_iter;
+ struct sgt_iter sgt_iter;
+ struct page *page;
int page_count = obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
int i;
@@ -790,8 +791,9 @@ i915_gem_object_save_bit_17_swizzle(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
}
i = 0;
- for_each_sg_page(obj->pages->sgl, &sg_iter, obj->pages->nents, 0) {
- if (page_to_phys(sg_page_iter_page(&sg_iter)) & (1 << 17))
+
+ for_each_sgt_page(page, sgt_iter, obj->pages) {
+ if (page_to_phys(page) & (1 << 17))
__set_bit(i, obj->bit_17);
else
__clear_bit(i, obj->bit_17);