diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-09-22 11:19:35 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-09-22 11:19:35 -0700 |
commit | de5cb0dcb74c294ec527eddfe5094acfdb21ff21 (patch) | |
tree | f669adb523b265f9b979c136df8a8334ea74ec62 /arch/x86 | |
parent | af9c191ac2a0c857f59d75b6812fef078ab1cefe (diff) | |
parent | 533ab223aa1a036cfe5d6747fa3be92069f80988 (diff) |
Merge branch 'address-masking'
Merge user access fast validation using address masking.
This allows architectures to optionally use a data dependent address
masking model instead of a conditional branch for validating user
accesses. That avoids the Spectre-v1 speculation barriers.
Right now only x86-64 takes advantage of this, and not all architectures
will be able to do it. It requires a guard region between the user and
kernel address spaces (so that you can't overflow from one to the
other), and an easy way to generate a guaranteed-to-fault address for
invalid user pointers.
Also note that this currently assumes that there is no difference
between user read and write accesses. If extended to architectures like
powerpc, we'll also need to separate out the user read-vs-write cases.
* address-masking:
x86: make the masked_user_access_begin() macro use its argument only once
x86: do the user address masking outside the user access area
x86: support user address masking instead of non-speculative conditional
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 11 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h index 04789f45ab2b..afce8ee5d7b7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h @@ -54,6 +54,17 @@ static inline unsigned long __untagged_addr_remote(struct mm_struct *mm, #define valid_user_address(x) ((__force long)(x) >= 0) /* + * Masking the user address is an alternative to a conditional + * user_access_begin that can avoid the fencing. This only works + * for dense accesses starting at the address. + */ +#define mask_user_address(x) ((typeof(x))((long)(x)|((long)(x)>>63))) +#define masked_user_access_begin(x) ({ \ + __auto_type __masked_ptr = (x); \ + __masked_ptr = mask_user_address(__masked_ptr); \ + __uaccess_begin(); __masked_ptr; }) + +/* * User pointers can have tag bits on x86-64. This scheme tolerates * arbitrary values in those bits rather then masking them off. * |