summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/MAINTAINERS
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>2021-04-29 22:59:37 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2021-04-30 11:20:41 -0700
commita3ddd79a17ee1ad43cf0200f158c30515da7b09c (patch)
treebfb46a8154025f4ef3517db3771c8f215d7adaaf /MAINTAINERS
parenta87132a229918fbc9d3cdacc61d3c8ae04e497ce (diff)
MAINTAINERS: assign pagewalk.h to MEMORY MANAGEMENT
Patch series "kernel-doc and MAINTAINERS clean-up". Roughly 900 warnings of about 21.000 kernel-doc warnings in the kernel tree warn with 'cannot understand function prototype:', i.e., the kernel-doc parser cannot parse the function's signature. The majority, about 600 cases of those, are just struct definitions following the kernel-doc description. Further, spot-check investigations suggest that the authors of the specific kernel-doc descriptions simply were not aware that the general format for a kernel-doc description for a structure requires to prefix the struct name with the keyword 'struct', as in 'struct struct_name - Brief description.'. Details on kernel-doc are at the Link below. Without the struct keyword, kernel-doc does not check if the kernel-doc description fits to the actual struct definition in the source code. Fortunately, in roughly a quarter of these cases, the kernel-doc description is actually complete wrt. its corresponding struct definition. So, the trivial change adding the struct keyword will allow us to keep the kernel-doc descriptions more consistent for future changes, by checking for new kernel-doc warnings. Also, some of the files in ./include/ are not assigned to a specific MAINTAINERS section and hence have no dedicated maintainer. So, if needed, the files in ./include/ are also assigned to the fitting MAINTAINERS section, as I need to identify whom to send the clean-up patch anyway. Here is the change from this kernel-doc janitorial work in the ./include/ directory for MEMORY MANAGEMENT. This patch (of 2): Commit a520110e4a15 ("mm: split out a new pagewalk.h header from mm.h") adds a new file in ./include/linux, but misses to update MAINTAINERS accordingly. Hence, ./scripts/get_maintainers.pl include/linux/pagewalk.h points only to lkml as general fallback for all files, whereas the original include/linux/mm.h clearly marks this file part of MEMORY MANAGEMENT. Assign include/linux/pagewalk.h to MEMORY MANAGEMENT. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210322122542.15072-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210322122542.15072-2-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@oth-regensburg.de> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'MAINTAINERS')
-rw-r--r--MAINTAINERS1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index b2c3af92d57c..591897e03525 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -11744,6 +11744,7 @@ F: include/linux/gfp.h
F: include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
F: include/linux/mm.h
F: include/linux/mmzone.h
+F: include/linux/pagewalk.h
F: include/linux/vmalloc.h
F: mm/