diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 108 |
2 files changed, 108 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h index 548dcbdb7111..c233efc106c6 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ enum bpf_reg_liveness { REG_LIVE_NONE = 0, /* reg hasn't been read or written this branch */ REG_LIVE_READ, /* reg was read, so we're sensitive to initial value */ REG_LIVE_WRITTEN, /* reg was written first, screening off later reads */ + REG_LIVE_DONE = 4, /* liveness won't be updating this register anymore */ }; struct bpf_reg_state { diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index e4724fe8120f..0125731e2512 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -397,12 +397,14 @@ static char slot_type_char[] = { static void print_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, enum bpf_reg_liveness live) { - if (live & (REG_LIVE_READ | REG_LIVE_WRITTEN)) + if (live & (REG_LIVE_READ | REG_LIVE_WRITTEN | REG_LIVE_DONE)) verbose(env, "_"); if (live & REG_LIVE_READ) verbose(env, "r"); if (live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) verbose(env, "w"); + if (live & REG_LIVE_DONE) + verbose(env, "D"); } static struct bpf_func_state *func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, @@ -1132,6 +1134,12 @@ static int mark_reg_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, /* if read wasn't screened by an earlier write ... */ if (writes && state->live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) break; + if (parent->live & REG_LIVE_DONE) { + verbose(env, "verifier BUG type %s var_off %lld off %d\n", + reg_type_str[parent->type], + parent->var_off.value, parent->off); + return -EFAULT; + } /* ... then we depend on parent's value */ parent->live |= REG_LIVE_READ; state = parent; @@ -5078,6 +5086,102 @@ static bool check_ids(u32 old_id, u32 cur_id, struct idpair *idmap) return false; } +static void clean_func_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_func_state *st) +{ + enum bpf_reg_liveness live; + int i, j; + + for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) { + live = st->regs[i].live; + /* liveness must not touch this register anymore */ + st->regs[i].live |= REG_LIVE_DONE; + if (!(live & REG_LIVE_READ)) + /* since the register is unused, clear its state + * to make further comparison simpler + */ + __mark_reg_not_init(&st->regs[i]); + } + + for (i = 0; i < st->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + live = st->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live; + /* liveness must not touch this stack slot anymore */ + st->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_DONE; + if (!(live & REG_LIVE_READ)) { + __mark_reg_not_init(&st->stack[i].spilled_ptr); + for (j = 0; j < BPF_REG_SIZE; j++) + st->stack[i].slot_type[j] = STACK_INVALID; + } + } +} + +static void clean_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_verifier_state *st) +{ + int i; + + if (st->frame[0]->regs[0].live & REG_LIVE_DONE) + /* all regs in this state in all frames were already marked */ + return; + + for (i = 0; i <= st->curframe; i++) + clean_func_state(env, st->frame[i]); +} + +/* the parentage chains form a tree. + * the verifier states are added to state lists at given insn and + * pushed into state stack for future exploration. + * when the verifier reaches bpf_exit insn some of the verifer states + * stored in the state lists have their final liveness state already, + * but a lot of states will get revised from liveness point of view when + * the verifier explores other branches. + * Example: + * 1: r0 = 1 + * 2: if r1 == 100 goto pc+1 + * 3: r0 = 2 + * 4: exit + * when the verifier reaches exit insn the register r0 in the state list of + * insn 2 will be seen as !REG_LIVE_READ. Then the verifier pops the other_branch + * of insn 2 and goes exploring further. At the insn 4 it will walk the + * parentage chain from insn 4 into insn 2 and will mark r0 as REG_LIVE_READ. + * + * Since the verifier pushes the branch states as it sees them while exploring + * the program the condition of walking the branch instruction for the second + * time means that all states below this branch were already explored and + * their final liveness markes are already propagated. + * Hence when the verifier completes the search of state list in is_state_visited() + * we can call this clean_live_states() function to mark all liveness states + * as REG_LIVE_DONE to indicate that 'parent' pointers of 'struct bpf_reg_state' + * will not be used. + * This function also clears the registers and stack for states that !READ + * to simplify state merging. + * + * Important note here that walking the same branch instruction in the callee + * doesn't meant that the states are DONE. The verifier has to compare + * the callsites + */ +static void clean_live_states(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn, + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl; + int i; + + sl = env->explored_states[insn]; + if (!sl) + return; + + while (sl != STATE_LIST_MARK) { + if (sl->state.curframe != cur->curframe) + goto next; + for (i = 0; i <= cur->curframe; i++) + if (sl->state.frame[i]->callsite != cur->frame[i]->callsite) + goto next; + clean_verifier_state(env, &sl->state); +next: + sl = sl->next; + } +} + /* Returns true if (rold safe implies rcur safe) */ static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state *rold, struct bpf_reg_state *rcur, struct idpair *idmap) @@ -5396,6 +5500,8 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) */ return 0; + clean_live_states(env, insn_idx, cur); + while (sl != STATE_LIST_MARK) { if (states_equal(env, &sl->state, cur)) { /* reached equivalent register/stack state, |