diff options
| author | Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> | 2018-11-07 23:00:39 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> | 2018-11-09 11:58:13 +0100 |
| commit | e901cbc29316fb06423de5dfbc5afb78d4efda53 (patch) | |
| tree | a2bc4990aff87c1f8bd57424b88cb32c2e8251d9 /net/xfrm | |
| parent | 9cf545ebd591da673bb6b6c88150212ad83567a9 (diff) | |
xfrm: policy: check reinserted policies match their node
validate the re-inserted policies match the lookup node.
Policies that fail this test won't be returned in the candidate set.
This is enabled by default for now, it should not cause noticeable
reinsert slow down.
Such reinserts are needed when we have to merge an existing node
(e.g. for 10.0.0.0/28 because a overlapping subnet was added (e.g.
10.0.0.0/24), so whenever this happens existing policies have to
be placed on the list of the new node.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/xfrm')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 32 |
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c index 81447d5d02e6..57e28dcd7c53 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c @@ -806,10 +806,16 @@ static void xfrm_policy_inexact_list_reinsert(struct net *net, struct xfrm_pol_inexact_node *n, u16 family) { + unsigned int matched_s, matched_d; struct hlist_node *newpos = NULL; struct xfrm_policy *policy, *p; + matched_s = 0; + matched_d = 0; + list_for_each_entry_reverse(policy, &net->xfrm.policy_all, walk.all) { + bool matches_s, matches_d; + if (!policy->bydst_reinsert) continue; @@ -827,6 +833,32 @@ static void xfrm_policy_inexact_list_reinsert(struct net *net, hlist_add_behind(&policy->bydst, newpos); else hlist_add_head(&policy->bydst, &n->hhead); + + /* paranoia checks follow. + * Check that the reinserted policy matches at least + * saddr or daddr for current node prefix. + * + * Matching both is fine, matching saddr in one policy + * (but not daddr) and then matching only daddr in another + * is a bug. + */ + matches_s = xfrm_policy_addr_delta(&policy->selector.saddr, + &n->addr, + n->prefixlen, + family) == 0; + matches_d = xfrm_policy_addr_delta(&policy->selector.daddr, + &n->addr, + n->prefixlen, + family) == 0; + if (matches_s && matches_d) + continue; + + WARN_ON_ONCE(!matches_s && !matches_d); + if (matches_s) + matched_s++; + if (matches_d) + matched_d++; + WARN_ON_ONCE(matched_s && matched_d); } } |