diff options
| author | Paolo Valerio <pvalerio@redhat.com> | 2022-04-15 10:08:41 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2022-04-15 11:50:02 +0100 |
| commit | cefa91b2332d7009bc0be5d951d6cbbf349f90f8 (patch) | |
| tree | c47bd275a75a9f6234f3270a4bfb0cbb5e0bac59 /net/openvswitch | |
| parent | ab198e1d0dd8dc4bc7575fb50758e2cbd51e14e1 (diff) | |
openvswitch: fix OOB access in reserve_sfa_size()
Given a sufficiently large number of actions, while copying and
reserving memory for a new action of a new flow, if next_offset is
greater than MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE, the function reserve_sfa_size() does
not return -EMSGSIZE as expected, but it allocates MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE
bytes increasing actions_len by req_size. This can then lead to an OOB
write access, especially when further actions need to be copied.
Fix it by rearranging the flow action size check.
KASAN splat below:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in reserve_sfa_size+0x1ba/0x380 [openvswitch]
Write of size 65360 at addr ffff888147e4001c by task handler15/836
CPU: 1 PID: 836 Comm: handler15 Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1+ #27
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x5a
print_report.cold+0x5e/0x5db
? __lock_text_start+0x8/0x8
? reserve_sfa_size+0x1ba/0x380 [openvswitch]
kasan_report+0xb5/0x130
? reserve_sfa_size+0x1ba/0x380 [openvswitch]
kasan_check_range+0xf5/0x1d0
memcpy+0x39/0x60
reserve_sfa_size+0x1ba/0x380 [openvswitch]
__add_action+0x24/0x120 [openvswitch]
ovs_nla_add_action+0xe/0x20 [openvswitch]
ovs_ct_copy_action+0x29d/0x1130 [openvswitch]
? __kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30
? unwind_get_return_address+0x56/0xa0
? create_prof_cpu_mask+0x20/0x20
? ovs_ct_verify+0xf0/0xf0 [openvswitch]
? prep_compound_page+0x198/0x2a0
? __kasan_check_byte+0x10/0x40
? kasan_unpoison+0x40/0x70
? ksize+0x44/0x60
? reserve_sfa_size+0x75/0x380 [openvswitch]
__ovs_nla_copy_actions+0xc26/0x2070 [openvswitch]
? __zone_watermark_ok+0x420/0x420
? validate_set.constprop.0+0xc90/0xc90 [openvswitch]
? __alloc_pages+0x1a9/0x3e0
? __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0x1da0/0x1da0
? unwind_next_frame+0x991/0x1e40
? __mod_node_page_state+0x99/0x120
? __mod_lruvec_page_state+0x2e3/0x470
? __kasan_kmalloc_large+0x90/0xe0
ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x1b4/0x2c0 [openvswitch]
ovs_flow_cmd_new+0x3cd/0xb10 [openvswitch]
...
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: f28cd2af22a0 ("openvswitch: fix flow actions reallocation")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valerio <pvalerio@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/openvswitch')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c index 7176156d3844..4c09cf8a0ab2 100644 --- a/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c @@ -2465,7 +2465,7 @@ static struct nlattr *reserve_sfa_size(struct sw_flow_actions **sfa, new_acts_size = max(next_offset + req_size, ksize(*sfa) * 2); if (new_acts_size > MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE) { - if ((MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE - next_offset) < req_size) { + if ((next_offset + req_size) > MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE) { OVS_NLERR(log, "Flow action size exceeds max %u", MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE); return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE); |