kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory

Patch series "kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow
memory", v11.

Currently, vmalloc space is backed by the early shadow page.  This means
that kasan is incompatible with VMAP_STACK.

This series provides a mechanism to back vmalloc space with real,
dynamically allocated memory.  I have only wired up x86, because that's
the only currently supported arch I can work with easily, but it's very
easy to wire up other architectures, and it appears that there is some
work-in-progress code to do this on arm64 and s390.

This has been discussed before in the context of VMAP_STACK:
 - https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202009
 - https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/22/198
 - https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/19/822

In terms of implementation details:

Most mappings in vmalloc space are small, requiring less than a full
page of shadow space.  Allocating a full shadow page per mapping would
therefore be wasteful.  Furthermore, to ensure that different mappings
use different shadow pages, mappings would have to be aligned to
KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE * PAGE_SIZE.

Instead, share backing space across multiple mappings.  Allocate a
backing page when a mapping in vmalloc space uses a particular page of
the shadow region.  This page can be shared by other vmalloc mappings
later on.

We hook in to the vmap infrastructure to lazily clean up unused shadow
memory.

Testing with test_vmalloc.sh on an x86 VM with 2 vCPUs shows that:

 - Turning on KASAN, inline instrumentation, without vmalloc, introuduces
   a 4.1x-4.2x slowdown in vmalloc operations.

 - Turning this on introduces the following slowdowns over KASAN:
     * ~1.76x slower single-threaded (test_vmalloc.sh performance)
     * ~2.18x slower when both cpus are performing operations
       simultaneously (test_vmalloc.sh sequential_test_order=1)

This is unfortunate but given that this is a debug feature only, not the
end of the world.  The benchmarks are also a stress-test for the vmalloc
subsystem: they're not indicative of an overall 2x slowdown!

This patch (of 4):

Hook into vmalloc and vmap, and dynamically allocate real shadow memory
to back the mappings.

Most mappings in vmalloc space are small, requiring less than a full
page of shadow space.  Allocating a full shadow page per mapping would
therefore be wasteful.  Furthermore, to ensure that different mappings
use different shadow pages, mappings would have to be aligned to
KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE * PAGE_SIZE.

Instead, share backing space across multiple mappings.  Allocate a
backing page when a mapping in vmalloc space uses a particular page of
the shadow region.  This page can be shared by other vmalloc mappings
later on.

We hook in to the vmap infrastructure to lazily clean up unused shadow
memory.

To avoid the difficulties around swapping mappings around, this code
expects that the part of the shadow region that covers the vmalloc space
will not be covered by the early shadow page, but will be left unmapped.
This will require changes in arch-specific code.

This allows KASAN with VMAP_STACK, and may be helpful for architectures
that do not have a separate module space (e.g.  powerpc64, which I am
currently working on).  It also allows relaxing the module alignment
back to PAGE_SIZE.

Testing with test_vmalloc.sh on an x86 VM with 2 vCPUs shows that:

 - Turning on KASAN, inline instrumentation, without vmalloc, introuduces
   a 4.1x-4.2x slowdown in vmalloc operations.

 - Turning this on introduces the following slowdowns over KASAN:
     * ~1.76x slower single-threaded (test_vmalloc.sh performance)
     * ~2.18x slower when both cpus are performing operations
       simultaneously (test_vmalloc.sh sequential_test_order=3D1)

This is unfortunate but given that this is a debug feature only, not the
end of the world.

The full benchmark results are:

Performance

                              No KASAN      KASAN original x baseline  KASAN vmalloc x baseline    x KASAN

fix_size_alloc_test             662004            11404956      17.23       19144610      28.92       1.68
full_fit_alloc_test             710950            12029752      16.92       13184651      18.55       1.10
long_busy_list_alloc_test      9431875            43990172       4.66       82970178       8.80       1.89
random_size_alloc_test         5033626            23061762       4.58       47158834       9.37       2.04
fix_align_alloc_test           1252514            15276910      12.20       31266116      24.96       2.05
random_size_align_alloc_te     1648501            14578321       8.84       25560052      15.51       1.75
align_shift_alloc_test             147                 830       5.65           5692      38.72       6.86
pcpu_alloc_test                  80732              125520       1.55         140864       1.74       1.12
Total Cycles              119240774314        763211341128       6.40  1390338696894      11.66       1.82

Sequential, 2 cpus

                              No KASAN      KASAN original x baseline  KASAN vmalloc x baseline    x KASAN

fix_size_alloc_test            1423150            14276550      10.03       27733022      19.49       1.94
full_fit_alloc_test            1754219            14722640       8.39       15030786       8.57       1.02
long_busy_list_alloc_test     11451858            52154973       4.55      107016027       9.34       2.05
random_size_alloc_test         5989020            26735276       4.46       68885923      11.50       2.58
fix_align_alloc_test           2050976            20166900       9.83       50491675      24.62       2.50
random_size_align_alloc_te     2858229            17971700       6.29       38730225      13.55       2.16
align_shift_alloc_test             405                6428      15.87          26253      64.82       4.08
pcpu_alloc_test                 127183              151464       1.19         216263       1.70       1.43
Total Cycles               54181269392        308723699764       5.70   650772566394      12.01       2.11
fix_size_alloc_test            1420404            14289308      10.06       27790035      19.56       1.94
full_fit_alloc_test            1736145            14806234       8.53       15274301       8.80       1.03
long_busy_list_alloc_test     11404638            52270785       4.58      107550254       9.43       2.06
random_size_alloc_test         6017006            26650625       4.43       68696127      11.42       2.58
fix_align_alloc_test           2045504            20280985       9.91       50414862      24.65       2.49
random_size_align_alloc_te     2845338            17931018       6.30       38510276      13.53       2.15
align_shift_alloc_test             472                3760       7.97           9656      20.46       2.57
pcpu_alloc_test                 118643              132732       1.12         146504       1.23       1.10
Total Cycles               54040011688        309102805492       5.72   651325675652      12.05       2.11

[dja@axtens.net: fixups]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191120052719.7201-1-dja@axtens.net
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D202009
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191031093909.9228-2-dja@axtens.net
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [shadow rework]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Co-developed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 233 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
index 6814d6d6a023..df3371d5c572 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/common.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
 #include <linux/bug.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 
+#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
+
 #include "kasan.h"
 #include "../slab.h"
 
@@ -590,6 +592,7 @@ void kasan_kfree_large(void *ptr, unsigned long ip)
 	/* The object will be poisoned by page_alloc. */
 }
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC
 int kasan_module_alloc(void *addr, size_t size)
 {
 	void *ret;
@@ -625,6 +628,7 @@ void kasan_free_shadow(const struct vm_struct *vm)
 	if (vm->flags & VM_KASAN)
 		vfree(kasan_mem_to_shadow(vm->addr));
 }
+#endif
 
 extern void __kasan_report(unsigned long addr, size_t size, bool is_write, unsigned long ip);
 
@@ -744,3 +748,232 @@ static int __init kasan_memhotplug_init(void)
 
 core_initcall(kasan_memhotplug_init);
 #endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC
+static int kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
+				      void *unused)
+{
+	unsigned long page;
+	pte_t pte;
+
+	if (likely(!pte_none(*ptep)))
+		return 0;
+
+	page = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!page)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	memset((void *)page, KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE);
+	pte = pfn_pte(PFN_DOWN(__pa(page)), PAGE_KERNEL);
+
+	spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+	if (likely(pte_none(*ptep))) {
+		set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, ptep, pte);
+		page = 0;
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+	if (page)
+		free_page(page);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long requested_size, struct vm_struct *area)
+{
+	unsigned long shadow_start, shadow_end;
+	int ret;
+
+	shadow_start = (unsigned long)kasan_mem_to_shadow(area->addr);
+	shadow_start = ALIGN_DOWN(shadow_start, PAGE_SIZE);
+	shadow_end = (unsigned long)kasan_mem_to_shadow(area->addr +
+							area->size);
+	shadow_end = ALIGN(shadow_end, PAGE_SIZE);
+
+	ret = apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, shadow_start,
+				  shadow_end - shadow_start,
+				  kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte, NULL);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	flush_cache_vmap(shadow_start, shadow_end);
+
+	kasan_unpoison_shadow(area->addr, requested_size);
+
+	area->flags |= VM_KASAN;
+
+	/*
+	 * We need to be careful about inter-cpu effects here. Consider:
+	 *
+	 *   CPU#0				  CPU#1
+	 * WRITE_ONCE(p, vmalloc(100));		while (x = READ_ONCE(p)) ;
+	 *					p[99] = 1;
+	 *
+	 * With compiler instrumentation, that ends up looking like this:
+	 *
+	 *   CPU#0				  CPU#1
+	 * // vmalloc() allocates memory
+	 * // let a = area->addr
+	 * // we reach kasan_populate_vmalloc
+	 * // and call kasan_unpoison_shadow:
+	 * STORE shadow(a), unpoison_val
+	 * ...
+	 * STORE shadow(a+99), unpoison_val	x = LOAD p
+	 * // rest of vmalloc process		<data dependency>
+	 * STORE p, a				LOAD shadow(x+99)
+	 *
+	 * If there is no barrier between the end of unpoisioning the shadow
+	 * and the store of the result to p, the stores could be committed
+	 * in a different order by CPU#0, and CPU#1 could erroneously observe
+	 * poison in the shadow.
+	 *
+	 * We need some sort of barrier between the stores.
+	 *
+	 * In the vmalloc() case, this is provided by a smp_wmb() in
+	 * clear_vm_uninitialized_flag(). In the per-cpu allocator and in
+	 * get_vm_area() and friends, the caller gets shadow allocated but
+	 * doesn't have any pages mapped into the virtual address space that
+	 * has been reserved. Mapping those pages in will involve taking and
+	 * releasing a page-table lock, which will provide the barrier.
+	 */
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Poison the shadow for a vmalloc region. Called as part of the
+ * freeing process at the time the region is freed.
+ */
+void kasan_poison_vmalloc(void *start, unsigned long size)
+{
+	size = round_up(size, KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE);
+	kasan_poison_shadow(start, size, KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID);
+}
+
+static int kasan_depopulate_vmalloc_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
+					void *unused)
+{
+	unsigned long page;
+
+	page = (unsigned long)__va(pte_pfn(*ptep) << PAGE_SHIFT);
+
+	spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+
+	if (likely(!pte_none(*ptep))) {
+		pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, ptep);
+		free_page(page);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Release the backing for the vmalloc region [start, end), which
+ * lies within the free region [free_region_start, free_region_end).
+ *
+ * This can be run lazily, long after the region was freed. It runs
+ * under vmap_area_lock, so it's not safe to interact with the vmalloc/vmap
+ * infrastructure.
+ *
+ * How does this work?
+ * -------------------
+ *
+ * We have a region that is page aligned, labelled as A.
+ * That might not map onto the shadow in a way that is page-aligned:
+ *
+ *                    start                     end
+ *                    v                         v
+ * |????????|????????|AAAAAAAA|AA....AA|AAAAAAAA|????????| < vmalloc
+ *  -------- -------- --------          -------- --------
+ *      |        |       |                 |        |
+ *      |        |       |         /-------/        |
+ *      \-------\|/------/         |/---------------/
+ *              |||                ||
+ *             |??AAAAAA|AAAAAAAA|AA??????|                < shadow
+ *                 (1)      (2)      (3)
+ *
+ * First we align the start upwards and the end downwards, so that the
+ * shadow of the region aligns with shadow page boundaries. In the
+ * example, this gives us the shadow page (2). This is the shadow entirely
+ * covered by this allocation.
+ *
+ * Then we have the tricky bits. We want to know if we can free the
+ * partially covered shadow pages - (1) and (3) in the example. For this,
+ * we are given the start and end of the free region that contains this
+ * allocation. Extending our previous example, we could have:
+ *
+ *  free_region_start                                    free_region_end
+ *  |                 start                     end      |
+ *  v                 v                         v        v
+ * |FFFFFFFF|FFFFFFFF|AAAAAAAA|AA....AA|AAAAAAAA|FFFFFFFF| < vmalloc
+ *  -------- -------- --------          -------- --------
+ *      |        |       |                 |        |
+ *      |        |       |         /-------/        |
+ *      \-------\|/------/         |/---------------/
+ *              |||                ||
+ *             |FFAAAAAA|AAAAAAAA|AAF?????|                < shadow
+ *                 (1)      (2)      (3)
+ *
+ * Once again, we align the start of the free region up, and the end of
+ * the free region down so that the shadow is page aligned. So we can free
+ * page (1) - we know no allocation currently uses anything in that page,
+ * because all of it is in the vmalloc free region. But we cannot free
+ * page (3), because we can't be sure that the rest of it is unused.
+ *
+ * We only consider pages that contain part of the original region for
+ * freeing: we don't try to free other pages from the free region or we'd
+ * end up trying to free huge chunks of virtual address space.
+ *
+ * Concurrency
+ * -----------
+ *
+ * How do we know that we're not freeing a page that is simultaneously
+ * being used for a fresh allocation in kasan_populate_vmalloc(_pte)?
+ *
+ * We _can_ have kasan_release_vmalloc and kasan_populate_vmalloc running
+ * at the same time. While we run under free_vmap_area_lock, the population
+ * code does not.
+ *
+ * free_vmap_area_lock instead operates to ensure that the larger range
+ * [free_region_start, free_region_end) is safe: because __alloc_vmap_area and
+ * the per-cpu region-finding algorithm both run under free_vmap_area_lock,
+ * no space identified as free will become used while we are running. This
+ * means that so long as we are careful with alignment and only free shadow
+ * pages entirely covered by the free region, we will not run in to any
+ * trouble - any simultaneous allocations will be for disjoint regions.
+ */
+void kasan_release_vmalloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
+			   unsigned long free_region_start,
+			   unsigned long free_region_end)
+{
+	void *shadow_start, *shadow_end;
+	unsigned long region_start, region_end;
+
+	region_start = ALIGN(start, PAGE_SIZE * KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE);
+	region_end = ALIGN_DOWN(end, PAGE_SIZE * KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE);
+
+	free_region_start = ALIGN(free_region_start,
+				  PAGE_SIZE * KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE);
+
+	if (start != region_start &&
+	    free_region_start < region_start)
+		region_start -= PAGE_SIZE * KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE;
+
+	free_region_end = ALIGN_DOWN(free_region_end,
+				     PAGE_SIZE * KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE);
+
+	if (end != region_end &&
+	    free_region_end > region_end)
+		region_end += PAGE_SIZE * KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE;
+
+	shadow_start = kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)region_start);
+	shadow_end = kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)region_end);
+
+	if (shadow_end > shadow_start) {
+		apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, (unsigned long)shadow_start,
+				    (unsigned long)(shadow_end - shadow_start),
+				    kasan_depopulate_vmalloc_pte, NULL);
+		flush_tlb_kernel_range((unsigned long)shadow_start,
+				       (unsigned long)shadow_end);
+	}
+}
+#endif