diff options
| author | Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> | 2019-05-06 16:19:33 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2019-06-03 11:55:49 +0200 |
| commit | 4609c4f963f353613812f999bb027aac795bcde8 (patch) | |
| tree | 56142bd0b7ed2af1fa9e7b92eabdb466999f9eb5 /kernel | |
| parent | 1ac4ba5ed0114bcc146d5743d97df414af25c524 (diff) | |
locking/lockdep: Remove redundant argument in check_deadlock
In check_deadlock(), the third argument read comes from the second
argument hlock so that it can be removed. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org
Cc: frederic@kernel.org
Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-18-duyuyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index b2ca20aa69aa..be4c1348ddcd 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -2246,7 +2246,7 @@ print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read */ static int -check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next, int read) +check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next) { struct held_lock *prev; struct held_lock *nest = NULL; @@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next, int read) * Allow read-after-read recursion of the same * lock class (i.e. read_lock(lock)+read_lock(lock)): */ - if ((read == 2) && prev->read) + if ((next->read == 2) && prev->read) return 2; /* @@ -2839,7 +2839,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, * The simple case: does the current hold the same lock * already? */ - int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, hlock->read); + int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock); if (!ret) return 0; |