Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next

Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2018-12-11

The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.

It has three minor merge conflicts, resolutions:

1) tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c

 Take first chunk with alignment_prevented_execution.

2) net/core/filter.c

  [...]
  case bpf_ctx_range_ptr(struct __sk_buff, flow_keys):
  case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, wire_len):
        return false;
  [...]

3) include/uapi/linux/bpf.h

  Take the second chunk for the two cases each.

The main changes are:

1) Add support for BPF line info via BTF and extend libbpf as well
   as bpftool's program dump to annotate output with BPF C code to
   facilitate debugging and introspection, from Martin.

2) Add support for BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_{K,X} in interpreter
   and all JIT backends, from Jiong.

3) Improve BPF test coverage on archs with no efficient unaligned
   access by adding an "any alignment" flag to the BPF program load
   to forcefully disable verifier alignment checks, from David.

4) Add a new bpf_prog_test_run_xattr() API to libbpf which allows for
   proper use of BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with data_out, from Lorenz.

5) Extend tc BPF programs to use a new __sk_buff field called wire_len
   for more accurate accounting of packets going to wire, from Petar.

6) Improve bpftool to allow dumping the trace pipe from it and add
   several improvements in bash completion and map/prog dump,
   from Quentin.

7) Optimize arm64 BPF JIT to always emit movn/movk/movk sequence for
   kernel addresses and add a dedicated BPF JIT backend allocator,
   from Ard.

8) Add a BPF helper function for IR remotes to report mouse movements,
   from Sean.

9) Various cleanups in BPF prog dump e.g. to make UAPI bpf_prog_info
   member naming consistent with existing conventions, from Yonghong
   and Song.

10) Misc cleanups and improvements in allowing to pass interface name
    via cmdline for xdp1 BPF example, from Matteo.

11) Fix a potential segfault in BPF sample loader's kprobes handling,
    from Daniel T.

12) Fix SPDX license in libbpf's README.rst, from Andrey.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 197 insertions, 42 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ee30effdf98a..8b511a4fe84a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -3584,12 +3584,15 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 			return err;
 
 		if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
+			struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg = regs + insn->src_reg;
+			struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg = regs + insn->dst_reg;
+
 			if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) {
 				/* case: R1 = R2
 				 * copy register state to dest reg
 				 */
-				regs[insn->dst_reg] = regs[insn->src_reg];
-				regs[insn->dst_reg].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN;
+				*dst_reg = *src_reg;
+				dst_reg->live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN;
 			} else {
 				/* R1 = (u32) R2 */
 				if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->src_reg)) {
@@ -3597,9 +3600,14 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 						"R%d partial copy of pointer\n",
 						insn->src_reg);
 					return -EACCES;
+				} else if (src_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE) {
+					*dst_reg = *src_reg;
+					dst_reg->live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN;
+				} else {
+					mark_reg_unknown(env, regs,
+							 insn->dst_reg);
 				}
-				mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg);
-				coerce_reg_to_size(&regs[insn->dst_reg], 4);
+				coerce_reg_to_size(dst_reg, 4);
 			}
 		} else {
 			/* case: R = imm
@@ -3650,11 +3658,6 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
-		if (opcode == BPF_ARSH && BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64) {
-			verbose(env, "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-
 		if ((opcode == BPF_LSH || opcode == BPF_RSH ||
 		     opcode == BPF_ARSH) && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
 			int size = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 ? 64 : 32;
@@ -4713,15 +4716,17 @@ err_free:
 #define MIN_BPF_FUNCINFO_SIZE	8
 #define MAX_FUNCINFO_REC_SIZE	252
 
-static int check_btf_func(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
-			  union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
+static int check_btf_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+			  const union bpf_attr *attr,
+			  union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 {
 	u32 i, nfuncs, urec_size, min_size, prev_offset;
 	u32 krec_size = sizeof(struct bpf_func_info);
-	struct bpf_func_info *krecord = NULL;
+	struct bpf_func_info *krecord;
 	const struct btf_type *type;
+	struct bpf_prog *prog;
+	const struct btf *btf;
 	void __user *urecord;
-	struct btf *btf;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	nfuncs = attr->func_info_cnt;
@@ -4741,20 +4746,15 @@ static int check_btf_func(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	btf = btf_get_by_fd(attr->prog_btf_fd);
-	if (IS_ERR(btf)) {
-		verbose(env, "unable to get btf from fd\n");
-		return PTR_ERR(btf);
-	}
+	prog = env->prog;
+	btf = prog->aux->btf;
 
 	urecord = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->func_info);
 	min_size = min_t(u32, krec_size, urec_size);
 
 	krecord = kvcalloc(nfuncs, krec_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
-	if (!krecord) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto free_btf;
-	}
+	if (!krecord)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nfuncs; i++) {
 		ret = bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(urecord, krec_size, urec_size);
@@ -4767,35 +4767,35 @@ static int check_btf_func(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 				if (put_user(min_size, &uattr->func_info_rec_size))
 					ret = -EFAULT;
 			}
-			goto free_btf;
+			goto err_free;
 		}
 
 		if (copy_from_user(&krecord[i], urecord, min_size)) {
 			ret = -EFAULT;
-			goto free_btf;
+			goto err_free;
 		}
 
-		/* check insn_offset */
+		/* check insn_off */
 		if (i == 0) {
-			if (krecord[i].insn_offset) {
+			if (krecord[i].insn_off) {
 				verbose(env,
-					"nonzero insn_offset %u for the first func info record",
-					krecord[i].insn_offset);
+					"nonzero insn_off %u for the first func info record",
+					krecord[i].insn_off);
 				ret = -EINVAL;
-				goto free_btf;
+				goto err_free;
 			}
-		} else if (krecord[i].insn_offset <= prev_offset) {
+		} else if (krecord[i].insn_off <= prev_offset) {
 			verbose(env,
 				"same or smaller insn offset (%u) than previous func info record (%u)",
-				krecord[i].insn_offset, prev_offset);
+				krecord[i].insn_off, prev_offset);
 			ret = -EINVAL;
-			goto free_btf;
+			goto err_free;
 		}
 
-		if (env->subprog_info[i].start != krecord[i].insn_offset) {
+		if (env->subprog_info[i].start != krecord[i].insn_off) {
 			verbose(env, "func_info BTF section doesn't match subprog layout in BPF program\n");
 			ret = -EINVAL;
-			goto free_btf;
+			goto err_free;
 		}
 
 		/* check type_id */
@@ -4804,20 +4804,18 @@ static int check_btf_func(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			verbose(env, "invalid type id %d in func info",
 				krecord[i].type_id);
 			ret = -EINVAL;
-			goto free_btf;
+			goto err_free;
 		}
 
-		prev_offset = krecord[i].insn_offset;
+		prev_offset = krecord[i].insn_off;
 		urecord += urec_size;
 	}
 
-	prog->aux->btf = btf;
 	prog->aux->func_info = krecord;
 	prog->aux->func_info_cnt = nfuncs;
 	return 0;
 
-free_btf:
-	btf_put(btf);
+err_free:
 	kvfree(krecord);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -4830,7 +4828,151 @@ static void adjust_btf_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++)
-		env->prog->aux->func_info[i].insn_offset = env->subprog_info[i].start;
+		env->prog->aux->func_info[i].insn_off = env->subprog_info[i].start;
+}
+
+#define MIN_BPF_LINEINFO_SIZE	(offsetof(struct bpf_line_info, line_col) + \
+		sizeof(((struct bpf_line_info *)(0))->line_col))
+#define MAX_LINEINFO_REC_SIZE	MAX_FUNCINFO_REC_SIZE
+
+static int check_btf_line(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+			  const union bpf_attr *attr,
+			  union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
+{
+	u32 i, s, nr_linfo, ncopy, expected_size, rec_size, prev_offset = 0;
+	struct bpf_subprog_info *sub;
+	struct bpf_line_info *linfo;
+	struct bpf_prog *prog;
+	const struct btf *btf;
+	void __user *ulinfo;
+	int err;
+
+	nr_linfo = attr->line_info_cnt;
+	if (!nr_linfo)
+		return 0;
+
+	rec_size = attr->line_info_rec_size;
+	if (rec_size < MIN_BPF_LINEINFO_SIZE ||
+	    rec_size > MAX_LINEINFO_REC_SIZE ||
+	    rec_size & (sizeof(u32) - 1))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Need to zero it in case the userspace may
+	 * pass in a smaller bpf_line_info object.
+	 */
+	linfo = kvcalloc(nr_linfo, sizeof(struct bpf_line_info),
+			 GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	if (!linfo)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	prog = env->prog;
+	btf = prog->aux->btf;
+
+	s = 0;
+	sub = env->subprog_info;
+	ulinfo = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->line_info);
+	expected_size = sizeof(struct bpf_line_info);
+	ncopy = min_t(u32, expected_size, rec_size);
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_linfo; i++) {
+		err = bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(ulinfo, expected_size, rec_size);
+		if (err) {
+			if (err == -E2BIG) {
+				verbose(env, "nonzero tailing record in line_info");
+				if (put_user(expected_size,
+					     &uattr->line_info_rec_size))
+					err = -EFAULT;
+			}
+			goto err_free;
+		}
+
+		if (copy_from_user(&linfo[i], ulinfo, ncopy)) {
+			err = -EFAULT;
+			goto err_free;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Check insn_off to ensure
+		 * 1) strictly increasing AND
+		 * 2) bounded by prog->len
+		 *
+		 * The linfo[0].insn_off == 0 check logically falls into
+		 * the later "missing bpf_line_info for func..." case
+		 * because the first linfo[0].insn_off must be the
+		 * first sub also and the first sub must have
+		 * subprog_info[0].start == 0.
+		 */
+		if ((i && linfo[i].insn_off <= prev_offset) ||
+		    linfo[i].insn_off >= prog->len) {
+			verbose(env, "Invalid line_info[%u].insn_off:%u (prev_offset:%u prog->len:%u)\n",
+				i, linfo[i].insn_off, prev_offset,
+				prog->len);
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_free;
+		}
+
+		if (!btf_name_offset_valid(btf, linfo[i].line_off) ||
+		    !btf_name_offset_valid(btf, linfo[i].file_name_off)) {
+			verbose(env, "Invalid line_info[%u].line_off or .file_name_off\n", i);
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_free;
+		}
+
+		if (s != env->subprog_cnt) {
+			if (linfo[i].insn_off == sub[s].start) {
+				sub[s].linfo_idx = i;
+				s++;
+			} else if (sub[s].start < linfo[i].insn_off) {
+				verbose(env, "missing bpf_line_info for func#%u\n", s);
+				err = -EINVAL;
+				goto err_free;
+			}
+		}
+
+		prev_offset = linfo[i].insn_off;
+		ulinfo += rec_size;
+	}
+
+	if (s != env->subprog_cnt) {
+		verbose(env, "missing bpf_line_info for %u funcs starting from func#%u\n",
+			env->subprog_cnt - s, s);
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto err_free;
+	}
+
+	prog->aux->linfo = linfo;
+	prog->aux->nr_linfo = nr_linfo;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_free:
+	kvfree(linfo);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int check_btf_info(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+			  const union bpf_attr *attr,
+			  union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
+{
+	struct btf *btf;
+	int err;
+
+	if (!attr->func_info_cnt && !attr->line_info_cnt)
+		return 0;
+
+	btf = btf_get_by_fd(attr->prog_btf_fd);
+	if (IS_ERR(btf))
+		return PTR_ERR(btf);
+	env->prog->aux->btf = btf;
+
+	err = check_btf_func(env, attr, uattr);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	err = check_btf_line(env, attr, uattr);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /* check %cur's range satisfies %old's */
@@ -6084,7 +6226,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	int i, j, subprog_start, subprog_end = 0, len, subprog;
 	struct bpf_insn *insn;
 	void *old_bpf_func;
-	int err = -ENOMEM;
+	int err;
 
 	if (env->subprog_cnt <= 1)
 		return 0;
@@ -6115,6 +6257,11 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		insn->imm = 1;
 	}
 
+	err = bpf_prog_alloc_jited_linfo(prog);
+	if (err)
+		goto out_undo_insn;
+
+	err = -ENOMEM;
 	func = kcalloc(env->subprog_cnt, sizeof(prog), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!func)
 		goto out_undo_insn;
@@ -6145,6 +6292,10 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		func[i]->aux->name[0] = 'F';
 		func[i]->aux->stack_depth = env->subprog_info[i].stack_depth;
 		func[i]->jit_requested = 1;
+		func[i]->aux->linfo = prog->aux->linfo;
+		func[i]->aux->nr_linfo = prog->aux->nr_linfo;
+		func[i]->aux->jited_linfo = prog->aux->jited_linfo;
+		func[i]->aux->linfo_idx = env->subprog_info[i].linfo_idx;
 		func[i] = bpf_int_jit_compile(func[i]);
 		if (!func[i]->jited) {
 			err = -ENOTSUPP;
@@ -6218,6 +6369,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	prog->bpf_func = func[0]->bpf_func;
 	prog->aux->func = func;
 	prog->aux->func_cnt = env->subprog_cnt;
+	bpf_prog_free_unused_jited_linfo(prog);
 	return 0;
 out_free:
 	for (i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++)
@@ -6234,6 +6386,7 @@ out_undo_insn:
 		insn->off = 0;
 		insn->imm = env->insn_aux_data[i].call_imm;
 	}
+	bpf_prog_free_jited_linfo(prog);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -6580,6 +6733,8 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
 	env->strict_alignment = !!(attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT);
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS))
 		env->strict_alignment = true;
+	if (attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+		env->strict_alignment = false;
 
 	ret = replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(env);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -6604,7 +6759,7 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto skip_full_check;
 
-	ret = check_btf_func(env->prog, env, attr, uattr);
+	ret = check_btf_info(env, attr, uattr);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto skip_full_check;