diff options
author | Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> | 2022-04-29 15:46:17 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> | 2022-05-13 10:08:02 -0600 |
commit | dc15f82f5329ab5daefa692bb80fb085a09ebd86 (patch) | |
tree | a509ce5f0fa7b5033b1cbcebd12190bb562ae9b3 /drivers/vfio | |
parent | c5e8c39282def775b707ccb5dfe644bd081aa7a8 (diff) |
vfio: Delete container_q
Now that the iommu core takes care of isolation there is no race between
driver attach and container unset. Once iommu_group_release_dma_owner()
returns the device can immediately be re-used.
Remove this mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0-v1-a1e8791d795b+6b-vfio_container_q_jgg@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/vfio')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c index cc0d337f7b13..8cb7ba03aa16 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c @@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ struct vfio_group { struct list_head vfio_next; struct list_head container_next; atomic_t opened; - wait_queue_head_t container_q; enum vfio_group_type type; unsigned int dev_counter; struct kvm *kvm; @@ -363,7 +362,6 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_alloc(struct iommu_group *iommu_group, refcount_set(&group->users, 1); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->device_list); mutex_init(&group->device_lock); - init_waitqueue_head(&group->container_q); group->iommu_group = iommu_group; /* put in vfio_group_release() */ iommu_group_ref_get(iommu_group); @@ -684,23 +682,6 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device) group->dev_counter--; mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock); - /* - * In order to support multiple devices per group, devices can be - * plucked from the group while other devices in the group are still - * in use. The container persists with this group and those remaining - * devices still attached. If the user creates an isolation violation - * by binding this device to another driver while the group is still in - * use, that's their fault. However, in the case of removing the last, - * or potentially the only, device in the group there can be no other - * in-use devices in the group. The user has done their due diligence - * and we should lay no claims to those devices. In order to do that, - * we need to make sure the group is detached from the container. - * Without this stall, we're potentially racing with a user process - * that may attempt to immediately bind this device to another driver. - */ - if (list_empty(&group->device_list)) - wait_event(group->container_q, !group->container); - if (group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU || group->type == VFIO_EMULATED_IOMMU) iommu_group_remove_device(device->dev); @@ -945,7 +926,6 @@ static void __vfio_group_unset_container(struct vfio_group *group) iommu_group_release_dma_owner(group->iommu_group); group->container = NULL; - wake_up(&group->container_q); list_del(&group->container_next); /* Detaching the last group deprivileges a container, remove iommu */ |