summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>2011-01-23 14:37:39 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2011-01-28 14:54:09 +0100
commitbbc9e2f452d9c4b166d1f9a78d941d80173312fe (patch)
treed75d41187b296235f833e942ed8c1dd938a7bae4 /arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
parent89e5dc218e084e13a3996db6693b01478912f4ee (diff)
x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit
The mapping between cpu/apicid and node is done via apicid_to_node[] on 64bit and apicid_2_node[] + apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() on 32bit. This difference makes it difficult to further unify 32 and 64bit NUMA handling. This patch unifies it by replacing both apicid_to_node[] and apicid_2_node[] with __apicid_to_node[] array, which is accessed by two accessors - set_apicid_to_node() and numa_cpu_node(). On 64bit, numa_cpu_node() always consults __apicid_to_node[] directly while 32bit goes through apic->numa_cpu_node() method to allow apic implementations to override it. srat_detect_node() for amd cpus contains workaround for broken NUMA configuration which assumes relationship between APIC ID, HT node ID and NUMA topology. Leave it to access __apicid_to_node[] directly as mapping through CPU might result in undesirable behavior change. The comment is reformatted and updated to note the ugliness. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Cc: yinghai@kernel.org Cc: brgerst@gmail.com Cc: gorcunov@gmail.com Cc: shaohui.zheng@intel.com Cc: rientjes@google.com LKML-Reference: <1295789862-25482-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c26
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index 95ea1551eebc..1e1026f61a5a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -26,10 +26,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_data);
struct memnode memnode;
-s16 apicid_to_node[MAX_LOCAL_APIC] __cpuinitdata = {
- [0 ... MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1] = NUMA_NO_NODE
-};
-
static unsigned long __initdata nodemap_addr;
static unsigned long __initdata nodemap_size;
@@ -716,12 +712,8 @@ void __init init_cpu_to_node(void)
BUG_ON(cpu_to_apicid == NULL);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- int node;
- u16 apicid = cpu_to_apicid[cpu];
+ int node = numa_cpu_node(cpu);
- if (apicid == BAD_APICID)
- continue;
- node = apicid_to_node[apicid];
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
continue;
if (!node_online(node))
@@ -731,6 +723,14 @@ void __init init_cpu_to_node(void)
}
#endif
+int __cpuinit numa_cpu_node(int cpu)
+{
+ int apicid = early_per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu);
+
+ if (apicid != BAD_APICID)
+ return __apicid_to_node[apicid];
+ return NUMA_NO_NODE;
+}
void __cpuinit numa_set_node(int cpu, int node)
{
@@ -776,13 +776,9 @@ void __cpuinit numa_remove_cpu(int cpu)
void __cpuinit numa_add_cpu(int cpu)
{
unsigned long addr;
- u16 apicid;
- int physnid;
- int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ int physnid, nid;
- apicid = early_per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu);
- if (apicid != BAD_APICID)
- nid = apicid_to_node[apicid];
+ nid = numa_cpu_node(cpu);
if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
nid = early_cpu_to_node(cpu);
BUG_ON(nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(nid));