diff options
| author | Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com> | 2019-11-10 17:44:53 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2019-11-11 08:31:55 +0100 |
| commit | 8f05c1ff8bfb8cbae0898e5dc6791927d1e5c503 (patch) | |
| tree | f42b7ccc918b9ed85c3c3847cd5c1ca1440d545c /arch/x86/events/amd/core.c | |
| parent | 1ca7feb59087a3d1a4ef79e09c42eca5c2e7fa38 (diff) | |
perf/x86/amd: Remove set but not used variable 'active'
'-Wunused-but-set-variable' triggers this warning:
arch/x86/events/amd/core.c: In function amd_pmu_handle_irq:
arch/x86/events/amd/core.c:656:6: warning: variable active set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
GCC is right, 'active' is not used anymore.
This variable was introduced earlier this year and then removed in:
df4d29732fdad perf/x86/amd: Change/fix NMI latency mitigation to use a timestamp
[ mingo: Improved the changelog, fixed build warning caused by this fix, improved surrounding code. ]
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com>
Cc: <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191110094453.113001-1-zhengyongjun3@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/events/amd/core.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/events/amd/core.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c index 64c3e70b0556..a7752cd78b89 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c @@ -652,15 +652,7 @@ static void amd_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event) */ static int amd_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) { - struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events); - int active, handled; - - /* - * Obtain the active count before calling x86_pmu_handle_irq() since - * it is possible that x86_pmu_handle_irq() may make a counter - * inactive (through x86_pmu_stop). - */ - active = __bitmap_weight(cpuc->active_mask, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX); + int handled; /* Process any counter overflows */ handled = x86_pmu_handle_irq(regs); @@ -670,8 +662,7 @@ static int amd_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) * NMIs will be claimed if arriving within that window. */ if (handled) { - this_cpu_write(perf_nmi_tstamp, - jiffies + perf_nmi_window); + this_cpu_write(perf_nmi_tstamp, jiffies + perf_nmi_window); return handled; } |