TODO

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index 11eeb76..a8ccc07 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -89,6 +89,26 @@ it. Ie., the NUL_CALLBACK would do something like this:
 where free_callback_info would free the closure and the callback info
 plus any other house keeping.
 
+Actually, we probably don't even need libffi closures. Instead
+NUL_CLOSURE() creates a nul_closure_t that contains the function, the
+types and the arguments. The caller of the closure is then responsible
+for supplying extra arguments and for destroying it.
+
+There will need to be functions
+
+      nul_create_closure (function, n_args, ...);
+
+      /* These functions would take care of storing/overwriting/destroying */
+      nul_closure_own (closure **closure, closure *closure);
+      nul_closure_disown (closure **closure);
+
+      /* tie the lifetime of the closure to the object */
+      nul_object_own_closure (object, closure **closure);
+
+      /* Takes any additional argument. These are added to the front
+       * of the parameter list followed by all the other
+       */
+      nul_closure_call (closure, ...);
 
 Dbus:
 
@@ -115,6 +135,11 @@ will probably have to be specified in some other ways. One question is
 if it is only the specification or also the actual types that are
 different.
 
+Or possibly make sfile use anonymous types.
+
+Why do we not need names for the introspection types? The parameter
+names would be quite useful actually.
+
 
 Things from glib: