summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/base
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2010-12-06Use the SDO package version as version for all ontologies. This makes ↵Sebastian Trueg5-0/+0
maintenance a lot simpler and cleaner. Also it will be much simpler to know which versions we talk about. Define release part of the version to be used in cmake macros
2010-08-19Added a properly configured ontology validator by Antoni Mylka and missing ↵Evgeny Egorochkin3-0/+1408
base ontologies. These ontologies are used for testing and not installed at least for now.
2009-11-30Fixed a few syntax issuesSebastian Trueg3-4/+9
2009-11-30Fixed paths to ontologies.Sebastian Trueg5-5/+5
2009-11-27* Renamed ontology file templates to <onto>.ontology.inSebastian Trueg5-0/+0
* Added cmake config files
2009-11-25Added ontology files for each ontology. This is where we store the namespace ↵Sebastian Trueg5-0/+322
and the serialization as well as the dependancies (TODO)
2009-11-23No need for the old rdf+xml versions anymore. We have trig now.Sebastian Trueg5-1392/+0
2009-11-10Added preliminary copyright headers. I am really no expert and am not sure ↵Sebastian Trueg5-0/+32
that this is enough - it probably is not.
2009-11-10Renamed dcq.trig to dcterms.trig to match the namespace abbreviationSebastian Trueg1-0/+0
2009-11-10Converted DC to trigSebastian Trueg4-1/+938
2009-11-09Converted RDF and RDFS to trig - the rest will follow shortlySebastian Trueg2-0/+214
2009-07-10Created dir structure as agreed upon at the Gran Canaria Desktop Summit 2009:Sebastian Trueg6-0/+1394
* One dir for each ontology. * All ontologies serialized as trig (ontology + metadata graph) * Each onto dir has a subdir "doc" which contains the template for documentation generation * The tools folder will contain the scripts used to generate the docs * The tools/files folder contains pics and stylesheet used for all onto docs (simply need to be copied to the destination dir) Also: * Moving old stuff into branches/legacy * One special ontology dir "base" which contains RDF, RDFS, and the Dublin Core ontologies. Here one thing still needs to be discussed: these ontos only exist as rdf+xml. Should we convert them for us and add metadata or should we handle them differently?