diff options
author | Will Thompson <will@willthompson.co.uk> | 2012-01-18 10:31:51 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Will Thompson <will@willthompson.co.uk> | 2012-01-18 10:32:49 +0000 |
commit | 473567b0928b4d48184c1c1ada6ab855bd4f4158 (patch) | |
tree | 4f3a06ebe0c6c408290a70d98814ab6f6bbc8969 /LICENSE | |
parent | ba23b2617f730702cd86284c6a623a8c0765ebfd (diff) |
LICENSE: simplifybustle-0.4.0
I'm okay with the binaries being GPLv3. Let's just say that they are.
Diffstat (limited to 'LICENSE')
-rw-r--r-- | LICENSE | 16 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 13 deletions
@@ -1,19 +1,9 @@ All code in this project is licensed under the GNU LGPL Version 2.1 or (at your option) any later version. -dbus-core, the Haskell reimplementation of the D-Bus wire protocol used -by the main application, is covered by the GNU GPL version 3. By my -interpretation, the result of building the LGPL ≥2.1 application against -a GPL3 library is covered by the terms of the GPL3. The dbus-core -maintainer, John Millikin, disagrees with this interpretation: he seems to hold -that using a GPL3 library does not necessarily require your application to -conform to the terms of GPL3. (See comments on -<http://www.jonkristensen.com/gpl-lgpl-and-ghc-linking/>, for instance.) - -In summary: - -• The Bustle binary probably falls under the terms of the GPL3; -• The Haskell source code is licensed under the LGPL v2.1 or later. +dbus-core, a Haskell reimplementation of the D-Bus wire protocol which Bustle +depends on, is covered by the GNU GPL version 3. Hence, Bustle binaries may be +distributed under the GNU GPL version 3. dfeet-method.png and dfeet-signal.png were, as their names suggest, taken from D-Feet, and are licensed under the GNU GPL Version 2 or |