summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>2014-01-08 16:40:39 +0200
committerMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>2014-01-08 10:58:55 -0800
commit4520714e3404bd00ddedf496a7a57bd0fea60b3a (patch)
tree45e40956f790e6ac5595067fa35ac88bc465ced2 /net
parente825eb1d7e06f616003c17e2e8e421c2e5e44142 (diff)
Bluetooth: Fix outgoing authentication requirement check
The check for HIGH security level dates back to pre-mgmt times when a raw L2CAP socket with HIGH security level was used to trigger dedicated bonding. For legacy pairing checking for the security level was the only way to catch the need to authenticate in all scenarios. With mgmt however, the pair_device command does not use HIGH security but MEDIUM security. Therefore, the existing code would never trigger authentication for a non-SSP connection without an MITM requirement (e.g. if user space provided a NoInputNoOutput IO capability). In such a scenario the mgmt_pair_device command would return success without actually triggering any kind of pairing. This patch updates the authentication requirement check to also consider MEDIUM security level, and thereby ensures that mgmt_pair_device will always trigger authentication. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
-rw-r--r--net/bluetooth/hci_event.c7
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
index 5f812455a450..cfcce448957b 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
@@ -1185,9 +1185,12 @@ static int hci_outgoing_auth_needed(struct hci_dev *hdev,
return 0;
/* Only request authentication for SSP connections or non-SSP
- * devices with sec_level HIGH or if MITM protection is requested */
+ * devices with sec_level MEDIUM or HIGH or if MITM protection
+ * is requested.
+ */
if (!hci_conn_ssp_enabled(conn) && !(conn->auth_type & 0x01) &&
- conn->pending_sec_level != BT_SECURITY_HIGH)
+ conn->pending_sec_level != BT_SECURITY_HIGH &&
+ conn->pending_sec_level != BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM)
return 0;
return 1;