From 17cf22c33e1f1b5e435469c84e43872579497653 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:51:53 -0800 Subject: pidns: Use task_active_pid_ns where appropriate The expressions tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns and task_active_pid_ns aka ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) should have the same number of cache line misses with the practical difference that ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) is released later in a processes life. Furthermore by using task_active_pid_ns it becomes trivial to write an unshare implementation for the the pid namespace. So I have used task_active_pid_ns everywhere I can. In fork since the pid has not yet been attached to the process I use ns_of_pid, to achieve the same effect. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman --- kernel/events/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/events') diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index dbccf83c134d..738f3564e83b 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -6155,7 +6155,7 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr *attr, int cpu, event->parent = parent_event; - event->ns = get_pid_ns(current->nsproxy->pid_ns); + event->ns = get_pid_ns(task_active_pid_ns(current)); event->id = atomic64_inc_return(&perf_event_id); event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE; -- cgit v1.2.3