diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 727 |
1 files changed, 602 insertions, 125 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index a834068a400e..664d93972373 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -140,9 +140,11 @@ struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem { struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *next; }; -#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 65536 +#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 98304 #define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_STACK 1024 +#define BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON ((void *)0xeB9F + POISON_POINTER_DELTA) + struct bpf_call_arg_meta { struct bpf_map *map_ptr; bool raw_mode; @@ -239,6 +241,12 @@ static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state) if (reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) verbose(",max_value=%llu", (unsigned long long)reg->max_value); + if (reg->min_align) + verbose(",min_align=%u", reg->min_align); + if (reg->aux_off) + verbose(",aux_off=%u", reg->aux_off); + if (reg->aux_off_align) + verbose(",aux_off_align=%u", reg->aux_off_align); } for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { if (state->stack_slot_type[i] == STACK_SPILL) @@ -296,7 +304,8 @@ static const char *const bpf_jmp_string[16] = { [BPF_EXIT >> 4] = "exit", }; -static void print_bpf_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn) +static void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_insn *insn) { u8 class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code); @@ -360,9 +369,19 @@ static void print_bpf_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn) insn->code, bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], insn->src_reg, insn->imm); - } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_IMM) { - verbose("(%02x) r%d = 0x%x\n", - insn->code, insn->dst_reg, insn->imm); + } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_IMM && + BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW) { + /* At this point, we already made sure that the second + * part of the ldimm64 insn is accessible. + */ + u64 imm = ((u64)(insn + 1)->imm << 32) | (u32)insn->imm; + bool map_ptr = insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD; + + if (map_ptr && !env->allow_ptr_leaks) + imm = 0; + + verbose("(%02x) r%d = 0x%llx\n", insn->code, + insn->dst_reg, (unsigned long long)imm); } else { verbose("BUG_ld_%02x\n", insn->code); return; @@ -444,16 +463,22 @@ static const int caller_saved[CALLER_SAVED_REGS] = { BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5 }; +static void mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) +{ + BUG_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG); + + memset(®s[regno], 0, sizeof(regs[regno])); + regs[regno].type = NOT_INIT; + regs[regno].min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; + regs[regno].max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; +} + static void init_reg_state(struct bpf_reg_state *regs) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) { - regs[i].type = NOT_INIT; - regs[i].imm = 0; - regs[i].min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - regs[i].max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; - } + for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) + mark_reg_not_init(regs, i); /* frame pointer */ regs[BPF_REG_FP].type = FRAME_PTR; @@ -479,6 +504,8 @@ static void reset_reg_range_values(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) { regs[regno].min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; regs[regno].max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; + regs[regno].value_from_signed = false; + regs[regno].min_align = 0; } static void mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, @@ -520,20 +547,6 @@ static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, return 0; } -static int bpf_size_to_bytes(int bpf_size) -{ - if (bpf_size == BPF_W) - return 4; - else if (bpf_size == BPF_H) - return 2; - else if (bpf_size == BPF_B) - return 1; - else if (bpf_size == BPF_DW) - return 8; - else - return -EINVAL; -} - static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type) { switch (type) { @@ -732,15 +745,29 @@ static int check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, } /* check access to 'struct bpf_context' fields */ -static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int off, int size, +static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type t, enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type) { + struct bpf_insn_access_aux info = { + .reg_type = *reg_type, + }; + /* for analyzer ctx accesses are already validated and converted */ if (env->analyzer_ops) return 0; if (env->prog->aux->ops->is_valid_access && - env->prog->aux->ops->is_valid_access(off, size, t, reg_type)) { + env->prog->aux->ops->is_valid_access(off, size, t, &info)) { + /* A non zero info.ctx_field_size indicates that this field is a + * candidate for later verifier transformation to load the whole + * field and then apply a mask when accessed with a narrower + * access than actual ctx access size. A zero info.ctx_field_size + * will only allow for whole field access and rejects any other + * type of narrower access. + */ + env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ctx_field_size = info.ctx_field_size; + *reg_type = info.reg_type; + /* remember the offset of last byte accessed in ctx */ if (env->prog->aux->max_ctx_offset < off + size) env->prog->aux->max_ctx_offset = off + size; @@ -751,12 +778,13 @@ static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int off, int size, return -EACCES; } -static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) +static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { - if (env->allow_ptr_leaks) + if (allow_ptr_leaks) return false; - switch (env->cur_state.regs[regno].type) { + switch (reg->type) { case UNKNOWN_VALUE: case CONST_IMM: return false; @@ -765,18 +793,43 @@ static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) } } +static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) +{ + return __is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, &env->cur_state.regs[regno]); +} + static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, - int off, int size) + int off, int size, bool strict) { - if (reg->id && size != 1) { - verbose("Unknown alignment. Only byte-sized access allowed in packet access.\n"); - return -EACCES; + int ip_align; + int reg_off; + + /* Byte size accesses are always allowed. */ + if (!strict || size == 1) + return 0; + + reg_off = reg->off; + if (reg->id) { + if (reg->aux_off_align % size) { + verbose("Packet access is only %u byte aligned, %d byte access not allowed\n", + reg->aux_off_align, size); + return -EACCES; + } + reg_off += reg->aux_off; } - /* skb->data is NET_IP_ALIGN-ed */ - if ((NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off + off) % size != 0) { + /* For platforms that do not have a Kconfig enabling + * CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS the value of + * NET_IP_ALIGN is universally set to '2'. And on platforms + * that do set CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, we get + * to this code only in strict mode where we want to emulate + * the NET_IP_ALIGN==2 checking. Therefore use an + * unconditional IP align value of '2'. + */ + ip_align = 2; + if ((ip_align + reg_off + off) % size != 0) { verbose("misaligned packet access off %d+%d+%d size %d\n", - NET_IP_ALIGN, reg->off, off, size); + ip_align, reg_off, off, size); return -EACCES; } @@ -784,9 +837,9 @@ static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, } static int check_val_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, - int size) + int size, bool strict) { - if (size != 1) { + if (strict && size != 1) { verbose("Unknown alignment. Only byte-sized access allowed in value access.\n"); return -EACCES; } @@ -794,16 +847,17 @@ static int check_val_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, return 0; } -static int check_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, +static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int off, int size) { + bool strict = env->strict_alignment; + switch (reg->type) { case PTR_TO_PACKET: - return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) ? 0 : - check_pkt_ptr_alignment(reg, off, size); + return check_pkt_ptr_alignment(reg, off, size, strict); case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ: - return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) ? 0 : - check_val_ptr_alignment(reg, size); + return check_val_ptr_alignment(reg, size, strict); default: if (off % size != 0) { verbose("misaligned access off %d size %d\n", @@ -821,7 +875,7 @@ static int check_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, * if t==write && value_regno==-1, some unknown value is stored into memory * if t==read && value_regno==-1, don't care what we read from memory */ -static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, +static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regno, int off, int bpf_size, enum bpf_access_type t, int value_regno) { @@ -836,7 +890,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, if (size < 0) return size; - err = check_ptr_alignment(reg, off, size); + err = check_ptr_alignment(env, reg, off, size); if (err) return err; @@ -864,12 +918,14 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, verbose("R%d leaks addr into ctx\n", value_regno); return -EACCES; } - err = check_ctx_access(env, off, size, t, ®_type); + err = check_ctx_access(env, insn_idx, off, size, t, ®_type); if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) { mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs, value_regno); /* note that reg.[id|off|range] == 0 */ state->regs[value_regno].type = reg_type; + state->regs[value_regno].aux_off = 0; + state->regs[value_regno].aux_off_align = 0; } } else if (reg->type == FRAME_PTR || reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { @@ -877,6 +933,10 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, verbose("invalid stack off=%d size=%d\n", off, size); return -EACCES; } + + if (env->prog->aux->stack_depth < -off) + env->prog->aux->stack_depth = -off; + if (t == BPF_WRITE) { if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks && state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off] == STACK_SPILL && @@ -919,7 +979,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, return err; } -static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) +static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; int err; @@ -940,14 +1000,19 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) if (err) return err; + if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->src_reg)) { + verbose("R%d leaks addr into mem\n", insn->src_reg); + return -EACCES; + } + /* check whether atomic_add can read the memory */ - err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ, -1); if (err) return err; /* check whether atomic_add can write into the same memory */ - return check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, + return check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1); } @@ -983,6 +1048,9 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, return -EACCES; } + if (env->prog->aux->stack_depth < -off) + env->prog->aux->stack_depth = -off; + if (meta && meta->raw_mode) { meta->access_size = access_size; meta->regno = regno; @@ -1215,6 +1283,10 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id) func_id != BPF_FUNC_current_task_under_cgroup) goto error; break; + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS: + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS: + if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem) + goto error; default: break; } @@ -1286,17 +1358,16 @@ static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (reg->type != PTR_TO_PACKET && reg->type != PTR_TO_PACKET_END) continue; - reg->type = UNKNOWN_VALUE; - reg->imm = 0; + __mark_reg_unknown_value(state->spilled_regs, + i / BPF_REG_SIZE); } } -static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id) +static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) { struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; const struct bpf_func_proto *fn = NULL; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; - struct bpf_reg_state *reg; struct bpf_call_arg_meta meta; bool changes_data; int i, err; @@ -1357,17 +1428,14 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id) * is inferred from register state. */ for (i = 0; i < meta.access_size; i++) { - err = check_mem_access(env, meta.regno, i, BPF_B, BPF_WRITE, -1); + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, meta.regno, i, BPF_B, BPF_WRITE, -1); if (err) return err; } /* reset caller saved regs */ - for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) { - reg = regs + caller_saved[i]; - reg->type = NOT_INIT; - reg->imm = 0; - } + for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) + mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]); /* update return register */ if (fn->ret_type == RET_INTEGER) { @@ -1375,6 +1443,8 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id) } else if (fn->ret_type == RET_VOID) { regs[BPF_REG_0].type = NOT_INIT; } else if (fn->ret_type == RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) { + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *insn_aux; + regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL; regs[BPF_REG_0].max_value = regs[BPF_REG_0].min_value = 0; /* remember map_ptr, so that check_map_access() @@ -1387,6 +1457,11 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id) } regs[BPF_REG_0].map_ptr = meta.map_ptr; regs[BPF_REG_0].id = ++env->id_gen; + insn_aux = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx]; + if (!insn_aux->map_ptr) + insn_aux->map_ptr = meta.map_ptr; + else if (insn_aux->map_ptr != meta.map_ptr) + insn_aux->map_ptr = BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON; } else { verbose("unknown return type %d of func %s#%d\n", fn->ret_type, func_id_name(func_id), func_id); @@ -1431,6 +1506,8 @@ add_imm: */ dst_reg->off += imm; } else { + bool had_id; + if (src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { /* R6=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=62) R7=imm22; r7 += r6 */ tmp_reg = *dst_reg; /* save r7 state */ @@ -1464,14 +1541,23 @@ add_imm: src_reg->imm); return -EACCES; } + + had_id = (dst_reg->id != 0); + /* dst_reg stays as pkt_ptr type and since some positive * integer value was added to the pointer, increment its 'id' */ dst_reg->id = ++env->id_gen; - /* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range and off to zero */ + /* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range to zero */ + dst_reg->aux_off += dst_reg->off; dst_reg->off = 0; dst_reg->range = 0; + if (had_id) + dst_reg->aux_off_align = min(dst_reg->aux_off_align, + src_reg->min_align); + else + dst_reg->aux_off_align = src_reg->min_align; } return 0; } @@ -1578,6 +1664,65 @@ static int evaluate_reg_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) return 0; } +static int evaluate_reg_imm_alu_unknown(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg = ®s[insn->dst_reg]; + struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg = ®s[insn->src_reg]; + u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); + s64 imm_log2 = __ilog2_u64((long long)dst_reg->imm); + + /* BPF_X code with src_reg->type UNKNOWN_VALUE here. */ + if (src_reg->imm > 0 && dst_reg->imm) { + switch (opcode) { + case BPF_ADD: + /* dreg += sreg + * where both have zero upper bits. Adding them + * can only result making one more bit non-zero + * in the larger value. + * Ex. 0xffff (imm=48) + 1 (imm=63) = 0x10000 (imm=47) + * 0xffff (imm=48) + 0xffff = 0x1fffe (imm=47) + */ + dst_reg->imm = min(src_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2); + dst_reg->imm--; + break; + case BPF_AND: + /* dreg &= sreg + * AND can not extend zero bits only shrink + * Ex. 0x00..00ffffff + * & 0x0f..ffffffff + * ---------------- + * 0x00..00ffffff + */ + dst_reg->imm = max(src_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2); + break; + case BPF_OR: + /* dreg |= sreg + * OR can only extend zero bits + * Ex. 0x00..00ffffff + * | 0x0f..ffffffff + * ---------------- + * 0x0f..00ffffff + */ + dst_reg->imm = min(src_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2); + break; + case BPF_SUB: + case BPF_MUL: + case BPF_RSH: + case BPF_LSH: + /* These may be flushed out later */ + default: + mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg); + } + } else { + mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg); + } + + dst_reg->type = UNKNOWN_VALUE; + return 0; +} + static int evaluate_reg_imm_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { @@ -1587,6 +1732,9 @@ static int evaluate_reg_imm_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); u64 dst_imm = dst_reg->imm; + if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && src_reg->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE) + return evaluate_reg_imm_alu_unknown(env, insn); + /* dst_reg->type == CONST_IMM here. Simulate execution of insns * containing ALU ops. Don't care about overflow or negative * values, just add/sub/... them; registers are in u64. @@ -1645,6 +1793,13 @@ static void check_reg_overflow(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; } +static u32 calc_align(u32 imm) +{ + if (!imm) + return 1U << 31; + return imm - ((imm - 1) & imm); +} + static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { @@ -1652,8 +1807,10 @@ static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, s64 min_val = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; u64 max_val = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); + u32 dst_align, src_align; dst_reg = ®s[insn->dst_reg]; + src_align = 0; if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { check_reg_overflow(®s[insn->src_reg]); min_val = regs[insn->src_reg].min_value; @@ -1669,17 +1826,37 @@ static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, regs[insn->src_reg].type != UNKNOWN_VALUE) { min_val = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; max_val = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; + src_align = 0; + } else { + src_align = regs[insn->src_reg].min_align; } } else if (insn->imm < BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE && (s64)insn->imm > BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) { min_val = max_val = insn->imm; + src_align = calc_align(insn->imm); } + dst_align = dst_reg->min_align; + /* We don't know anything about what was done to this register, mark it - * as unknown. + * as unknown. Also, if both derived bounds came from signed/unsigned + * mixed compares and one side is unbounded, we cannot really do anything + * with them as boundaries cannot be trusted. Thus, arithmetic of two + * regs of such kind will get invalidated bounds on the dst side. */ - if (min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE && - max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) { + if ((min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE && + max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) || + (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && + ((min_val != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE && + max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) || + (min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE && + max_val != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) || + (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE && + dst_reg->max_value == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) || + (dst_reg->min_value == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE && + dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)) && + regs[insn->dst_reg].value_from_signed != + regs[insn->src_reg].value_from_signed)) { reset_reg_range_values(regs, insn->dst_reg); return; } @@ -1688,10 +1865,12 @@ static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, * do our normal operations to the register, we need to set the values * to the min/max since they are undefined. */ - if (min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) - dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - if (max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) - dst_reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; + if (opcode != BPF_SUB) { + if (min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) + dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; + if (max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) + dst_reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; + } switch (opcode) { case BPF_ADD: @@ -1699,18 +1878,28 @@ static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, dst_reg->min_value += min_val; if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) dst_reg->max_value += max_val; + dst_reg->min_align = min(src_align, dst_align); break; case BPF_SUB: + /* If one of our values was at the end of our ranges, then the + * _opposite_ value in the dst_reg goes to the end of our range. + */ + if (min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) + dst_reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; + if (max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) + dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) - dst_reg->min_value -= min_val; + dst_reg->min_value -= max_val; if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) - dst_reg->max_value -= max_val; + dst_reg->max_value -= min_val; + dst_reg->min_align = min(src_align, dst_align); break; case BPF_MUL: if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) dst_reg->min_value *= min_val; if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) dst_reg->max_value *= max_val; + dst_reg->min_align = max(src_align, dst_align); break; case BPF_AND: /* Disallow AND'ing of negative numbers, ain't nobody got time @@ -1722,17 +1911,23 @@ static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, else dst_reg->min_value = 0; dst_reg->max_value = max_val; + dst_reg->min_align = max(src_align, dst_align); break; case BPF_LSH: /* Gotta have special overflow logic here, if we're shifting * more than MAX_RANGE then just assume we have an invalid * range. */ - if (min_val > ilog2(BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)) + if (min_val > ilog2(BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)) { dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - else if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) - dst_reg->min_value <<= min_val; - + dst_reg->min_align = 1; + } else { + if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) + dst_reg->min_value <<= min_val; + if (!dst_reg->min_align) + dst_reg->min_align = 1; + dst_reg->min_align <<= min_val; + } if (max_val > ilog2(BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)) dst_reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; else if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) @@ -1742,11 +1937,19 @@ static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, /* RSH by a negative number is undefined, and the BPF_RSH is an * unsigned shift, so make the appropriate casts. */ - if (min_val < 0 || dst_reg->min_value < 0) + if (min_val < 0 || dst_reg->min_value < 0) { dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - else + } else { dst_reg->min_value = (u64)(dst_reg->min_value) >> min_val; + } + if (min_val < 0) { + dst_reg->min_align = 1; + } else { + dst_reg->min_align >>= (u64) min_val; + if (!dst_reg->min_align) + dst_reg->min_align = 1; + } if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) dst_reg->max_value >>= max_val; break; @@ -1846,8 +2049,11 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) */ regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM; regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = insn->imm; + regs[insn->dst_reg].id = 0; regs[insn->dst_reg].max_value = insn->imm; regs[insn->dst_reg].min_value = insn->imm; + regs[insn->dst_reg].min_align = calc_align(insn->imm); + regs[insn->dst_reg].value_from_signed = false; } } else if (opcode > BPF_END) { @@ -1911,6 +2117,17 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) return 0; } else if (opcode == BPF_ADD && BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 && + dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK && + ((BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && + regs[insn->src_reg].type == CONST_IMM) || + BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K)) { + if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) + dst_reg->imm += regs[insn->src_reg].imm; + else + dst_reg->imm += insn->imm; + return 0; + } else if (opcode == BPF_ADD && + BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 && (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET || (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET))) { @@ -2012,40 +2229,63 @@ static void reg_set_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg, struct bpf_reg_state *false_reg, u64 val, u8 opcode) { + bool value_from_signed = true; + bool is_range = true; + switch (opcode) { case BPF_JEQ: /* If this is false then we know nothing Jon Snow, but if it is * true then we know for sure. */ true_reg->max_value = true_reg->min_value = val; + is_range = false; break; case BPF_JNE: /* If this is true we know nothing Jon Snow, but if it is false * we know the value for sure; */ false_reg->max_value = false_reg->min_value = val; + is_range = false; break; case BPF_JGT: - /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ - false_reg->min_value = 0; + value_from_signed = false; /* fallthrough */ case BPF_JSGT: + if (true_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) + reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0); + if (false_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) + reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0); + if (opcode == BPF_JGT) { + /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ + false_reg->min_value = 0; + } /* If this is false then we know the maximum val is val, * otherwise we know the min val is val+1. */ false_reg->max_value = val; + false_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; true_reg->min_value = val + 1; + true_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; break; case BPF_JGE: - /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ - false_reg->min_value = 0; + value_from_signed = false; /* fallthrough */ case BPF_JSGE: + if (true_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) + reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0); + if (false_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) + reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0); + if (opcode == BPF_JGE) { + /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ + false_reg->min_value = 0; + } /* If this is false then we know the maximum value is val - 1, * otherwise we know the mimimum value is val. */ false_reg->max_value = val - 1; + false_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; true_reg->min_value = val; + true_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; break; default: break; @@ -2053,6 +2293,12 @@ static void reg_set_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg, check_reg_overflow(false_reg); check_reg_overflow(true_reg); + if (is_range) { + if (__is_pointer_value(false, false_reg)) + reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0); + if (__is_pointer_value(false, true_reg)) + reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0); + } } /* Same as above, but for the case that dst_reg is a CONST_IMM reg and src_reg @@ -2062,41 +2308,64 @@ static void reg_set_min_max_inv(struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg, struct bpf_reg_state *false_reg, u64 val, u8 opcode) { + bool value_from_signed = true; + bool is_range = true; + switch (opcode) { case BPF_JEQ: /* If this is false then we know nothing Jon Snow, but if it is * true then we know for sure. */ true_reg->max_value = true_reg->min_value = val; + is_range = false; break; case BPF_JNE: /* If this is true we know nothing Jon Snow, but if it is false * we know the value for sure; */ false_reg->max_value = false_reg->min_value = val; + is_range = false; break; case BPF_JGT: - /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ - true_reg->min_value = 0; + value_from_signed = false; /* fallthrough */ case BPF_JSGT: + if (true_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) + reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0); + if (false_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) + reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0); + if (opcode == BPF_JGT) { + /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ + true_reg->min_value = 0; + } /* * If this is false, then the val is <= the register, if it is * true the register <= to the val. */ false_reg->min_value = val; + false_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; true_reg->max_value = val - 1; + true_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; break; case BPF_JGE: - /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ - true_reg->min_value = 0; + value_from_signed = false; /* fallthrough */ case BPF_JSGE: + if (true_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) + reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0); + if (false_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) + reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0); + if (opcode == BPF_JGE) { + /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ + true_reg->min_value = 0; + } /* If this is false then constant < register, if it is true then * the register < constant. */ false_reg->min_value = val + 1; + false_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; true_reg->max_value = val; + true_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; break; default: break; @@ -2104,6 +2373,12 @@ static void reg_set_min_max_inv(struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg, check_reg_overflow(false_reg); check_reg_overflow(true_reg); + if (is_range) { + if (__is_pointer_value(false, false_reg)) + reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0); + if (__is_pointer_value(false, true_reg)) + reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0); + } } static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id, @@ -2112,14 +2387,19 @@ static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id, struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[regno]; if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL && reg->id == id) { - reg->type = type; + if (type == UNKNOWN_VALUE) { + __mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, regno); + } else if (reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta) { + reg->type = CONST_PTR_TO_MAP; + reg->map_ptr = reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta; + } else { + reg->type = type; + } /* We don't need id from this point onwards anymore, thus we * should better reset it, so that state pruning has chances * to take effect. */ reg->id = 0; - if (type == UNKNOWN_VALUE) - __mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, regno); } } @@ -2286,6 +2566,7 @@ static int check_ld_imm(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM; regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = imm; + regs[insn->dst_reg].id = 0; return 0; } @@ -2328,7 +2609,6 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; u8 mode = BPF_MODE(insn->code); - struct bpf_reg_state *reg; int i, err; if (!may_access_skb(env->prog->type)) { @@ -2361,11 +2641,8 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } /* reset caller saved regs to unreadable */ - for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) { - reg = regs + caller_saved[i]; - reg->type = NOT_INIT; - reg->imm = 0; - } + for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) + mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]); /* mark destination R0 register as readable, since it contains * the value fetched from the packet @@ -2524,6 +2801,7 @@ peek_stack: env->explored_states[t + 1] = STATE_LIST_MARK; } else { /* conditional jump with two edges */ + env->explored_states[t] = STATE_LIST_MARK; ret = push_insn(t, t + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env); if (ret == 1) goto peek_stack; @@ -2575,7 +2853,8 @@ err_free: /* the following conditions reduce the number of explored insns * from ~140k to ~80k for ultra large programs that use a lot of ptr_to_packet */ -static bool compare_ptrs_to_packet(struct bpf_reg_state *old, +static bool compare_ptrs_to_packet(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *old, struct bpf_reg_state *cur) { if (old->id != cur->id) @@ -2618,7 +2897,7 @@ static bool compare_ptrs_to_packet(struct bpf_reg_state *old, * 'if (R4 > data_end)' and all further insn were already good with r=20, * so they will be good with r=30 and we can prune the search. */ - if (old->off <= cur->off && + if (!env->strict_alignment && old->off <= cur->off && old->off >= old->range && cur->off >= cur->range) return true; @@ -2682,8 +2961,14 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, rcur->type != NOT_INIT)) continue; + /* Don't care about the reg->id in this case. */ + if (rold->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL && + rcur->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL && + rold->map_ptr == rcur->map_ptr) + continue; + if (rold->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && rcur->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && - compare_ptrs_to_packet(rold, rcur)) + compare_ptrs_to_packet(env, rold, rcur)) continue; return false; @@ -2701,6 +2986,8 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return false; if (i % BPF_REG_SIZE) continue; + if (old->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) + continue; if (memcmp(&old->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE], &cur->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE], sizeof(old->spilled_regs[0]))) @@ -2816,15 +3103,22 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) goto process_bpf_exit; } - if (log_level && do_print_state) { - verbose("\nfrom %d to %d:", prev_insn_idx, insn_idx); + if (need_resched()) + cond_resched(); + + if (log_level > 1 || (log_level && do_print_state)) { + if (log_level > 1) + verbose("%d:", insn_idx); + else + verbose("\nfrom %d to %d:", + prev_insn_idx, insn_idx); print_verifier_state(&env->cur_state); do_print_state = false; } if (log_level) { verbose("%d: ", insn_idx); - print_bpf_insn(insn); + print_bpf_insn(env, insn); } err = ext_analyzer_insn_hook(env, insn_idx, prev_insn_idx); @@ -2855,18 +3149,12 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) /* check that memory (src_reg + off) is readable, * the state of dst_reg will be updated by this func */ - err = check_mem_access(env, insn->src_reg, insn->off, + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->src_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ, insn->dst_reg); if (err) return err; - if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_W && - BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_DW) { - insn_idx++; - continue; - } - prev_src_type = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ptr_type; if (*prev_src_type == NOT_INIT) { @@ -2894,7 +3182,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) enum bpf_reg_type *prev_dst_type, dst_reg_type; if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_XADD) { - err = check_xadd(env, insn); + err = check_xadd(env, insn_idx, insn); if (err) return err; insn_idx++; @@ -2913,7 +3201,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) dst_reg_type = regs[insn->dst_reg].type; /* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */ - err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, insn->src_reg); if (err) @@ -2942,7 +3230,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return err; /* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */ - err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1); if (err) @@ -2960,7 +3248,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return -EINVAL; } - err = check_call(env, insn->imm); + err = check_call(env, insn->imm, insn_idx); if (err) return err; @@ -3040,20 +3328,38 @@ process_bpf_exit: insn_idx++; } - verbose("processed %d insns\n", insn_processed); + verbose("processed %d insns, stack depth %d\n", + insn_processed, env->prog->aux->stack_depth); return 0; } +static int check_map_prealloc(struct bpf_map *map) +{ + return (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH && + map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH && + map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS) || + !(map->map_flags & BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC); +} + static int check_map_prog_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog *prog) { - if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT && - (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH || - map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH) && - (map->map_flags & BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC)) { - verbose("perf_event programs can only use preallocated hash map\n"); - return -EINVAL; + /* Make sure that BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT programs only use + * preallocated hash maps, since doing memory allocation + * in overflow_handler can crash depending on where nmi got + * triggered. + */ + if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT) { + if (!check_map_prealloc(map)) { + verbose("perf_event programs can only use preallocated hash map\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (map->inner_map_meta && + !check_map_prealloc(map->inner_map_meta)) { + verbose("perf_event programs can only use preallocated inner hash map\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } } return 0; } @@ -3182,17 +3488,54 @@ static void convert_pseudo_ld_imm64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) insn->src_reg = 0; } +/* single env->prog->insni[off] instruction was replaced with the range + * insni[off, off + cnt). Adjust corresponding insn_aux_data by copying + * [0, off) and [off, end) to new locations, so the patched range stays zero + */ +static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 prog_len, + u32 off, u32 cnt) +{ + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, *old_data = env->insn_aux_data; + + if (cnt == 1) + return 0; + new_data = vzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * prog_len); + if (!new_data) + return -ENOMEM; + memcpy(new_data, old_data, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * off); + memcpy(new_data + off + cnt - 1, old_data + off, + sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * (prog_len - off - cnt + 1)); + env->insn_aux_data = new_data; + vfree(old_data); + return 0; +} + +static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off, + const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len) +{ + struct bpf_prog *new_prog; + + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, off, patch, len); + if (!new_prog) + return NULL; + if (adjust_insn_aux_data(env, new_prog->len, off, len)) + return NULL; + return new_prog; +} + /* convert load instructions that access fields of 'struct __sk_buff' * into sequence of instructions that access fields of 'struct sk_buff' */ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { const struct bpf_verifier_ops *ops = env->prog->aux->ops; + int i, cnt, size, ctx_field_size, delta = 0; const int insn_cnt = env->prog->len; struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16], *insn; struct bpf_prog *new_prog; enum bpf_access_type type; - int i, cnt, delta = 0; + bool is_narrower_load; + u32 target_size; if (ops->gen_prologue) { cnt = ops->gen_prologue(insn_buf, env->seen_direct_write, @@ -3201,10 +3544,10 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) verbose("bpf verifier is misconfigured\n"); return -EINVAL; } else if (cnt) { - new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, 0, - insn_buf, cnt); + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, 0, insn_buf, cnt); if (!new_prog) return -ENOMEM; + env->prog = new_prog; delta += cnt - 1; } @@ -3229,17 +3572,56 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) else continue; - if (env->insn_aux_data[i].ptr_type != PTR_TO_CTX) + if (env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type != PTR_TO_CTX) continue; - cnt = ops->convert_ctx_access(type, insn, insn_buf, env->prog); - if (cnt == 0 || cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf)) { + ctx_field_size = env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ctx_field_size; + size = BPF_LDST_BYTES(insn); + + /* If the read access is a narrower load of the field, + * convert to a 4/8-byte load, to minimum program type specific + * convert_ctx_access changes. If conversion is successful, + * we will apply proper mask to the result. + */ + is_narrower_load = size < ctx_field_size; + if (is_narrower_load) { + u32 off = insn->off; + u8 size_code; + + if (type == BPF_WRITE) { + verbose("bpf verifier narrow ctx access misconfigured\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + size_code = BPF_H; + if (ctx_field_size == 4) + size_code = BPF_W; + else if (ctx_field_size == 8) + size_code = BPF_DW; + + insn->off = off & ~(ctx_field_size - 1); + insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | size_code; + } + + target_size = 0; + cnt = ops->convert_ctx_access(type, insn, insn_buf, env->prog, + &target_size); + if (cnt == 0 || cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf) || + (ctx_field_size && !target_size)) { verbose("bpf verifier is misconfigured\n"); return -EINVAL; } - new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, i + delta, insn_buf, - cnt); + if (is_narrower_load && size < target_size) { + if (ctx_field_size <= 4) + insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, insn->dst_reg, + (1 << size * 8) - 1); + else + insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, insn->dst_reg, + (1 << size * 8) - 1); + } + + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt); if (!new_prog) return -ENOMEM; @@ -3253,6 +3635,90 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return 0; } +/* fixup insn->imm field of bpf_call instructions + * and inline eligible helpers as explicit sequence of BPF instructions + * + * this function is called after eBPF program passed verification + */ +static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +{ + struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog; + struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi; + const struct bpf_func_proto *fn; + const int insn_cnt = prog->len; + struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16]; + struct bpf_prog *new_prog; + struct bpf_map *map_ptr; + int i, cnt, delta = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) { + if (insn->code != (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL)) + continue; + + if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_route_realm) + prog->dst_needed = 1; + if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32) + bpf_user_rnd_init_once(); + if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) { + /* If we tail call into other programs, we + * cannot make any assumptions since they can + * be replaced dynamically during runtime in + * the program array. + */ + prog->cb_access = 1; + env->prog->aux->stack_depth = MAX_BPF_STACK; + + /* mark bpf_tail_call as different opcode to avoid + * conditional branch in the interpeter for every normal + * call and to prevent accidental JITing by JIT compiler + * that doesn't support bpf_tail_call yet + */ + insn->imm = 0; + insn->code = BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL; + continue; + } + + if (ebpf_jit_enabled() && insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem) { + map_ptr = env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].map_ptr; + if (map_ptr == BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON || + !map_ptr->ops->map_gen_lookup) + goto patch_call_imm; + + cnt = map_ptr->ops->map_gen_lookup(map_ptr, insn_buf); + if (cnt == 0 || cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf)) { + verbose("bpf verifier is misconfigured\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, + cnt); + if (!new_prog) + return -ENOMEM; + + delta += cnt - 1; + + /* keep walking new program and skip insns we just inserted */ + env->prog = prog = new_prog; + insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta; + continue; + } + +patch_call_imm: + fn = prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto(insn->imm); + /* all functions that have prototype and verifier allowed + * programs to call them, must be real in-kernel functions + */ + if (!fn->func) { + verbose("kernel subsystem misconfigured func %s#%d\n", + func_id_name(insn->imm), insn->imm); + return -EFAULT; + } + insn->imm = fn->func - __bpf_call_base; + } + + return 0; +} + static void free_states(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl, *sln; @@ -3321,6 +3787,10 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr) log_level = 0; } + env->strict_alignment = !!(attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT); + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) + env->strict_alignment = true; + ret = replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(env); if (ret < 0) goto skip_full_check; @@ -3348,6 +3818,9 @@ skip_full_check: /* program is valid, convert *(u32*)(ctx + off) accesses */ ret = convert_ctx_accesses(env); + if (ret == 0) + ret = fixup_bpf_calls(env); + if (log_level && log_len >= log_size - 1) { BUG_ON(log_len >= log_size); /* verifier log exceeded user supplied buffer */ @@ -3423,6 +3896,10 @@ int bpf_analyzer(struct bpf_prog *prog, const struct bpf_ext_analyzer_ops *ops, log_level = 0; + env->strict_alignment = false; + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) + env->strict_alignment = true; + env->explored_states = kcalloc(env->prog->len, sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state_list *), GFP_KERNEL); |