summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/udevsend.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorkay.sievers@vrfy.org <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>2004-05-14 23:18:41 -0700
committerGreg KH <gregkh@suse.de>2005-04-26 21:35:18 -0700
commit28e169f067aa96b406342677922e34e7361a7d1b (patch)
treeaac07716263341479dd6435e074f6939526f858c /udevsend.c
parent1eae2f3f712ff839bf80721bf9c44a76a78460dc (diff)
[PATCH] udevsend fallback
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 04:54:44PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 01:16:41PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > Hi, > > the execution of udev depends on the proper fuction of udevd, the > > serializing daemon. If we can't connect to udevd within a 20 second we > > give up and the request to create a node is lost. Hope this never happens, > > but a broken udevd may prevent udev from working. > > > > What do you think? Should we call the udev binary directly from udevsend > > instead of discarding the event? This way we would create the node, regardless > > of the state of udevd. It would be 20 seconds later and maybe not in the right > > sequence order - but the node will propably be there. > > > > Does it sound sane? What do you think? > > That sounds like a good "failsafe" thing to do. Here we go: Add a fallback udev call to udevsend. If udevsend is unable to send the event to udevd, we call the udev binary instead of doing nothing and exiting.
Diffstat (limited to 'udevsend.c')
-rw-r--r--udevsend.c52
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/udevsend.c b/udevsend.c
index f28e44543..a52d6ec16 100644
--- a/udevsend.c
+++ b/udevsend.c
@@ -98,6 +98,26 @@ static int start_daemon(void)
return 0;
}
+static void run_udev(const char *subsystem)
+{
+ pid_t pid;
+
+ pid = fork();
+ switch (pid) {
+ case 0:
+ /* child */
+ execl(UDEV_BIN, "udev", subsystem, NULL);
+ dbg("exec of child failed");
+ exit(1);
+ break;
+ case -1:
+ dbg("fork of child failed");
+ break;
+ default:
+ wait(NULL);
+ }
+}
+
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
struct hotplug_msg msg;
@@ -109,14 +129,12 @@ int main(int argc, char* argv[])
int retval = 1;
int loop;
struct timespec tspec;
- int sock;
+ int sock = -1;
struct sockaddr_un saddr;
socklen_t addrlen;
int started_daemon = 0;
-#ifdef DEBUG
init_logging("udevsend");
-#endif
dbg("version %s", UDEV_VERSION);
subsystem = get_subsystem(argv[1]);
@@ -150,7 +168,7 @@ int main(int argc, char* argv[])
sock = socket(AF_LOCAL, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
if (sock == -1) {
dbg("error getting socket");
- goto exit;
+ goto fallback;
}
memset(&saddr, 0x00, sizeof(struct sockaddr_un));
@@ -168,22 +186,21 @@ int main(int argc, char* argv[])
(struct sockaddr *)&saddr, addrlen);
if (retval != -1) {
retval = 0;
- goto close_and_exit;
+ goto exit;
}
-
+
if (errno != ECONNREFUSED) {
dbg("error sending message");
- goto close_and_exit;
+ goto fallback;
}
-
+
if (!started_daemon) {
- dbg("connect failed, try starting daemon...");
+ info("starting udevd daemon");
retval = start_daemon();
if (retval) {
- dbg("error starting daemon");
- goto exit;
+ info("error starting daemon");
+ goto fallback;
}
-
dbg("daemon started");
started_daemon = 1;
} else {
@@ -193,9 +210,14 @@ int main(int argc, char* argv[])
nanosleep(&tspec, NULL);
}
}
-
-close_and_exit:
- close(sock);
+
+fallback:
+ info("unable to connect to event daemon, try to call udev directly");
+ run_udev(subsystem);
+
exit:
+ if (sock != -1)
+ close(sock);
+
return retval;
}