diff options
author | Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> | 2016-05-13 15:58:10 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> | 2016-06-17 11:35:58 +0200 |
commit | 5c7af02b103790ac1fb6a71822788892c70290b6 (patch) | |
tree | 461aac3e1d7caacda49b58c5226319e0b74ffa77 /dix | |
parent | bab0f450a719a11799491043b82c2f293fed27fe (diff) |
xrandrprovider: Do not use separate lists for unbound / source / offload slaves
A single provider can be both a offload and source slave at the same time,
the use of seperate lists breaks in this case e.g. :
xrandr --listproviders
Providers: number : 2
Provider 0: id: 0x7b cap: 0xf, Source Output, Sink Output, Source Offload, Sink Offload crtcs: 3 outputs: 2 associated providers: 0 name:modesetting
Provider 1: id: 0x46 cap: 0xf, Source Output, Sink Output, Source Offload, Sink Offload crtcs: 2 outputs: 5 associated providers: 0 name:modesetting
xrandr --setprovideroutputsource 1 0x7b
xrandr --listproviders
Providers: number : 2
Provider 0: id: 0x7b cap: 0xf, Source Output, Sink Output, Source Offload, Sink Offload crtcs: 3 outputs: 2 associated providers: 1 name:modesetting
Provider 1: id: 0x46 cap: 0xf, Source Output, Sink Output, Source Offload, Sink Offload crtcs: 2 outputs: 5 associated providers: 1 name:modesetting
xrandr --setprovideroffloadsink 1 0x7b
xrandr --listproviders
Providers: number : 3
Provider 0: id: 0x7b cap: 0xf, Source Output, Sink Output, Source Offload, Sink Offload crtcs: 3 outputs: 2 associated providers: 2 name:modesetting
Provider 1: id: 0x46 cap: 0xf, Source Output, Sink Output, Source Offload, Sink Offload crtcs: 2 outputs: 5 associated providers: 2 name:modesetting
Provider 2: id: 0x46 cap: 0xf, Source Output, Sink Output, Source Offload, Sink Offload crtcs: 2 outputs: 5 associated providers: 2 name:modesetting
Not good. The problem is that the provider with id 0x46 now is on both
the output_slave_list and the offload_slave_list of the master screen.
This commit fixes this by unifying all 3 lists into a single slaves list.
Note that this does change the struct _Screen definition, so this is an ABI
break. I do not expect any of the drivers to actually use the removed / changed
fields so a recompile should suffice.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'dix')
-rw-r--r-- | dix/dispatch.c | 30 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/dix/dispatch.c b/dix/dispatch.c index 86124c683..8a7eff712 100644 --- a/dix/dispatch.c +++ b/dix/dispatch.c @@ -3789,9 +3789,7 @@ static int init_screen(ScreenPtr pScreen, int i, Bool gpu) pScreen->CreateScreenResources = 0; xorg_list_init(&pScreen->pixmap_dirty_list); - xorg_list_init(&pScreen->unattached_list); - xorg_list_init(&pScreen->output_slave_list); - xorg_list_init(&pScreen->offload_slave_list); + xorg_list_init(&pScreen->slave_list); /* * This loop gets run once for every Screen that gets added, @@ -3950,7 +3948,7 @@ AttachUnboundGPU(ScreenPtr pScreen, ScreenPtr new) { assert(new->isGPU); assert(!new->current_master); - xorg_list_add(&new->unattached_head, &pScreen->unattached_list); + xorg_list_add(&new->slave_head, &pScreen->slave_list); new->current_master = pScreen; } @@ -3958,7 +3956,9 @@ void DetachUnboundGPU(ScreenPtr slave) { assert(slave->isGPU); - xorg_list_del(&slave->unattached_head); + assert(!slave->is_output_slave); + assert(!slave->is_offload_slave); + xorg_list_del(&slave->slave_head); slave->current_master = NULL; } @@ -3966,31 +3966,35 @@ void AttachOutputGPU(ScreenPtr pScreen, ScreenPtr new) { assert(new->isGPU); - xorg_list_add(&new->output_head, &pScreen->output_slave_list); - new->current_master = pScreen; + assert(!new->is_output_slave); + assert(new->current_master == pScreen); + new->is_output_slave = TRUE; + new->current_master->output_slaves++; } void DetachOutputGPU(ScreenPtr slave) { assert(slave->isGPU); - xorg_list_del(&slave->output_head); - slave->current_master = NULL; + assert(slave->is_output_slave); + slave->current_master->output_slaves--; + slave->is_output_slave = FALSE; } void AttachOffloadGPU(ScreenPtr pScreen, ScreenPtr new) { assert(new->isGPU); - xorg_list_add(&new->offload_head, &pScreen->offload_slave_list); - new->current_master = pScreen; + assert(!new->is_offload_slave); + assert(new->current_master == pScreen); + new->is_offload_slave = TRUE; } void DetachOffloadGPU(ScreenPtr slave) { assert(slave->isGPU); - xorg_list_del(&slave->offload_head); - slave->current_master = NULL; + assert(slave->is_offload_slave); + slave->is_offload_slave = FALSE; } |