From 7f6b437e9b82a6d702a7f8f75c83ffdec6e03c54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 20:35:30 -0500 Subject: net: smc_close: mark expected switch fall-through In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/smc/smc_close.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net/smc/smc_close.c') diff --git a/net/smc/smc_close.c b/net/smc/smc_close.c index f0d16fb825f7..a6c65595f248 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_close.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_close.c @@ -360,7 +360,8 @@ static void smc_close_passive_work(struct work_struct *work) case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT1: if (rxflags->peer_done_writing) sk->sk_state = SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2; - /* fall through to check for closing */ + /* fall through */ + /* to check for closing */ case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2: case SMC_PEERFINCLOSEWAIT: if (!smc_cdc_rxed_any_close(&smc->conn)) -- cgit v1.2.3