summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-04-17btrfs: reduce div64 calls by limiting the number of stripes of a chunk to u32Qu Wenruo1-6/+7
There are quite some div64 calls inside btrfs_map_block() and its variants. Such calls are for @stripe_nr, where @stripe_nr is the number of stripes before our logical bytenr inside a chunk. However we can eliminate such div64 calls by just reducing the width of @stripe_nr from 64 to 32. This can be done because our chunk size limit is already 10G, with fixed stripe length 64K. Thus a U32 is definitely enough to contain the number of stripes. With such width reduction, we can get rid of slower div64, and extra warning for certain 32bit arch. This patch would do: - Add a new tree-checker chunk validation on chunk length Make sure no chunk can reach 256G, which can also act as a bitflip checker. - Reduce the width from u64 to u32 for @stripe_nr variables - Replace unnecessary div64 calls with regular modulo and division 32bit division and modulo are much faster than 64bit operations, and we are finally free of the div64 fear at least in those involved functions. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-04-17btrfs: replace map_lookup->stripe_len by BTRFS_STRIPE_LENQu Wenruo1-22/+21
Currently btrfs doesn't support stripe lengths other than 64KiB. This is already set in the tree-checker. There is really no meaning to record that fixed value in map_lookup for now, and can all be replaced with BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN. Furthermore we can use the fix stripe length to do the following optimization: - Use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT to replace some 64bit division Now we only need to do a right shift. And the value of BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN itself is already too large for bit shift, thus if we accidentally use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN to do bit shift, a compiler warning would be triggered. Thus this bit shift optimization would be safe. - Use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_MASK to calculate the offset inside a stripe Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-15btrfs: fix spelling mistakes found using codespellColin Ian King1-1/+1
There quite a few spelling mistakes as found using codespell. Fix them. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-13btrfs: scrub: improve tree block error reportingQu Wenruo1-9/+40
[BUG] When debugging a scrub related metadata error, it turns out that our metadata error reporting is not ideal. The only 3 error messages are: - BTRFS error (device dm-2): bdev /dev/mapper/test-scratch1 errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 1 Showing we have metadata generation mismatch errors. - BTRFS error (device dm-2): unable to fixup (regular) error at logical 7110656 on dev /dev/mapper/test-scratch1 Showing which tree blocks are corrupted. - BTRFS warning (device dm-2): checksum/header error at logical 24772608 on dev /dev/mapper/test-scratch2, physical 3801088: metadata node (level 1) in tree 5 Showing which physical range the corrupted metadata is at. We have to combine the above 3 to know we have a corrupted metadata with generation mismatch. And this is already the better case, if we have other problems, like fsid mismatch, we can not even know the cause. [CAUSE] The problem is caused by the fact that, scrub_checksum_tree_block() never outputs any error message. It just return two bits for scrub: sblock->header_error, and sblock->generation_error. And later we report error in scrub_print_warning(), but unfortunately we only have two bits, there is not really much thing we can done to print any detailed errors. [FIX] This patch will do the following to enhance the error reporting of metadata scrub: - Add extra warning (ratelimited) for every error we hit This can help us to distinguish the different types of errors. Some errors can help us to know what's going wrong immediately, like bytenr mismatch. - Re-order the checks Currently we check bytenr first, then immediately generation. This can lead to false generation mismatch reports, while the fsid mismatches. Here is the new output for the bug I'm debugging (we forgot to writeback tree blocks for commit roots): BTRFS warning (device dm-2): tree block 24117248 mirror 1 has bad fsid, has b77cd862-f150-4c71-90ec-7baf0544d83f want 17df6abf-23cd-445f-b350-5b3e40bfd2fc BTRFS warning (device dm-2): tree block 24117248 mirror 0 has bad fsid, has b77cd862-f150-4c71-90ec-7baf0544d83f want 17df6abf-23cd-445f-b350-5b3e40bfd2fc Now we can immediately know it's some tree blocks didn't even get written back, other than the original confusing generation mismatch. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: introduce a bitmap based csum range search functionQu Wenruo1-4/+4
Although we have an existing function, btrfs_lookup_csums_range(), to find all data checksums for a range, it's based on a btrfs_ordered_sum list. For the incoming RAID56 data checksum verification at RMW time, we don't want to waste time by allocating temporary memory. So this patch will introduce a new helper, btrfs_lookup_csums_bitmap(). It will use bitmap based result, which will be a perfect fit for later RAID56 usage. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: use btrfs_dev_name() helper to handle missing devices betterQu Wenruo1-11/+9
[BUG] If dev-replace failed to re-construct its data/metadata, the kernel message would be incorrect for the missing device: BTRFS info (device dm-1): dev_replace from <missing disk> (devid 2) to /dev/mapper/test-scratch2 started BTRFS error (device dm-1): failed to rebuild valid logical 38862848 for dev (efault) Note the above "dev (efault)" of the second line. While the first line is properly reporting "<missing disk>". [CAUSE] Although dev-replace is using btrfs_dev_name(), the heavy lifting work is still done by scrub (scrub is reused by both dev-replace and regular scrub). Unfortunately scrub code never uses btrfs_dev_name() helper, as it's only declared locally inside dev-replace.c. [FIX] Fix the output by: - Move the btrfs_dev_name() helper to volumes.h - Use btrfs_dev_name() to replace open-coded rcu_str_deref() calls Only zoned code is not touched, as I'm not familiar with degraded zoned code. - Constify return value and parameter Now the output looks pretty sane: BTRFS info (device dm-1): dev_replace from <missing disk> (devid 2) to /dev/mapper/test-scratch2 started BTRFS error (device dm-1): failed to rebuild valid logical 38862848 for dev <missing disk> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: use a structure to pass arguments to backref walking functionsFilipe Manana1-5/+9
The public backref walking functions have quite a lot of arguments that are passed down the call stack to find_parent_nodes(), the core function of the backref walking code. The next patches in series will need to add even arguments to these functions that should be passed not only to find_parent_nodes(), but also to other functions used by the later (directly or even lower in the call stack). So create a structure to hold all these arguments and state used by the main backref walking function, find_parent_nodes(), and use it as the argument for the public backref walking functions iterate_extent_inodes(), btrfs_find_all_leafs() and btrfs_find_all_roots(). Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: use a single argument for extent offset in backref walking functionsFilipe Manana1-1/+1
The interface for find_parent_nodes() has two extent offset related arguments: 1) One u64 pointer argument for the extent offset; 2) One boolean argument to tell if the extent offset should be ignored or not. These are confusing, becase the extent offset pointer can be NULL and in some cases callers pass a NULL value as a way to tell the backref walking code to ignore offsets in file extent items (and simply consider all file extent items that point to the target data extent). The boolean argument was added in commit c995ab3cda3f ("btrfs: add a flag to iterate_inodes_from_logical to find all extent refs for uncompressed extents"), but it was never really necessary, it was enough if it could find a way to get a NULL value passed to the "extent_item_pos" argument of find_parent_nodes(). The arguments are also passed to functions called by find_parent_nodes() and respective helper functions, which further makes everything more complicated than needed. Then we have several backref walking related functions that end up calling find_parent_nodes(), either directly or through some other function that they call, and for many we have to use an "extent_item_pos" (u64) argument and a boolean "ignore_offset" argument too. This is confusing and not really necessary. So use a single argument to specify the extent offset, as a simple u64 and not as a pointer, but using a special value of (u64)-1, defined as a documented constant, to indicate when the extent offset should be ignored. This is also preparation work for the upcoming patches in the series that add other arguments to find_parent_nodes() and other related functions that use it. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: send: optimize clone detection to increase extent sharingFilipe Manana1-2/+2
Currently send does not do the best decisions when it comes to decide between multiple clone sources, which results in clone operations for partial extent ranges, which has the following disadvantages: 1) We get less shared extents at the destination; 2) We have to read more data during the send operation and emit more write commands. Besides not being optimal behaviour, it also breaks user expectations and is often reported by users, with a recent example in the Link tag at the bottom of this change log. Part of the reason for this non-optimal behaviour is that the backref walking code does not provide information about the length of the file extent items that were found for each backref, so send is blind about which backref is the best to chose as a cloning source. The other existing reasons are just silliness, namely always prefering the inode with the lowest number when multiple are found for the same root and when we can clone from multiple roots, always prefer the send root over any of the other clone roots. This does not make any sense since any inode or root is fine and as good as any other inode/root. Fix this by making backref walking pass information about the number of bytes referenced by each file extent item and then have send's backref callback pick the inode with the highest number of bytes for each root. Finally select the root from which we can clone more bytes from. Example reproducer: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 2M 0 2M" $MNT/foo cp --reflink=always $MNT/foo $MNT/bar cp --reflink=always $MNT/foo $MNT/baz sync # Overwrite the second half of file foo. xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcd -b 1M 1M 1M" $MNT/foo sync echo echo "*** fiemap in the original filesystem ***" echo xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/foo xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/bar xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/baz echo btrfs filesystem du $MNT btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap btrfs send -f /tmp/send_stream $MNT/snap umount $MNT mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV &> /dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/send_stream $MNT echo echo "*** fiemap in the new filesystem ***" echo xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/snap/foo xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/snap/bar xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/snap/baz echo btrfs filesystem du $MNT rm -f /tmp/send_stream rm -f /tmp/snap.fssum umount $MNT Before this change: $ ./test.sh (...) *** fiemap in the original filesystem *** /mnt/sdi/foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..2047]: 26624..28671 2048 0x2000 1: [2048..4095]: 30720..32767 2048 0x1 /mnt/sdi/bar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..4095]: 26624..30719 4096 0x2001 /mnt/sdi/baz: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..4095]: 26624..30719 4096 0x2001 Total Exclusive Set shared Filename 2.00MiB 1.00MiB - /mnt/sdi/foo 2.00MiB 0.00B - /mnt/sdi/bar 2.00MiB 0.00B - /mnt/sdi/baz 6.00MiB 1.00MiB 2.00MiB /mnt/sdi Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap At subvol snap *** fiemap in the new filesystem *** /mnt/sdi/snap/foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..4095]: 26624..30719 4096 0x2001 /mnt/sdi/snap/bar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..2047]: 26624..28671 2048 0x2000 1: [2048..4095]: 30720..32767 2048 0x1 /mnt/sdi/snap/baz: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..2047]: 26624..28671 2048 0x2000 1: [2048..4095]: 32768..34815 2048 0x1 Total Exclusive Set shared Filename 2.00MiB 0.00B - /mnt/sdi/snap/foo 2.00MiB 1.00MiB - /mnt/sdi/snap/bar 2.00MiB 1.00MiB - /mnt/sdi/snap/baz 6.00MiB 2.00MiB - /mnt/sdi/snap 6.00MiB 2.00MiB 2.00MiB /mnt/sdi We end up with two 1M extents that are not shared for files bar and baz. After this change: $ ./test.sh (...) *** fiemap in the original filesystem *** /mnt/sdi/foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..2047]: 26624..28671 2048 0x2000 1: [2048..4095]: 30720..32767 2048 0x1 /mnt/sdi/bar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..4095]: 26624..30719 4096 0x2001 /mnt/sdi/baz: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..4095]: 26624..30719 4096 0x2001 Total Exclusive Set shared Filename 2.00MiB 1.00MiB - /mnt/sdi/foo 2.00MiB 0.00B - /mnt/sdi/bar 2.00MiB 0.00B - /mnt/sdi/baz 6.00MiB 1.00MiB 2.00MiB /mnt/sdi Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap At subvol snap *** fiemap in the new filesystem *** /mnt/sdi/snap/foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..4095]: 26624..30719 4096 0x2001 /mnt/sdi/snap/bar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..2047]: 26624..28671 2048 0x2000 1: [2048..4095]: 30720..32767 2048 0x2001 /mnt/sdi/snap/baz: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..2047]: 26624..28671 2048 0x2000 1: [2048..4095]: 30720..32767 2048 0x2001 Total Exclusive Set shared Filename 2.00MiB 0.00B - /mnt/sdi/snap/foo 2.00MiB 0.00B - /mnt/sdi/snap/bar 2.00MiB 0.00B - /mnt/sdi/snap/baz 6.00MiB 0.00B - /mnt/sdi/snap 6.00MiB 0.00B 3.00MiB /mnt/sdi Now there's a much better sharing, files bar and baz share 1M of the extent of file foo and the second extent of files bar and baz is shared between themselves. This will later be turned into a test case for fstests. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20221008005704.795b44b0@crass-HP-ZBook-15-G2/ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move scrub prototypes into scrub.hJosef Bacik1-0/+1
Move these out of ctree.h into scrub.h to cut down on code in ctree.h. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move file-item prototypes into their own headerJosef Bacik1-0/+1
Move these prototypes out of ctree.h and into file-item.h. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: sink gfp_t parameter to alloc_scrub_sectorDavid Sterba1-6/+6
All callers pas GFP_KERNEL as parameter so we can use it directly in alloc_scrub_sector. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: switch GFP_NOFS to GFP_KERNEL in scrub_setup_recheck_blockDavid Sterba1-2/+2
There's only one caller that calls scrub_setup_recheck_block in the memalloc_nofs_save/_restore protection so it's effectively already GFP_NOFS and it's safe to use GFP_KERNEL. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move accessor helpers into accessors.hJosef Bacik1-0/+1
This is a large patch, but because they're all macros it's impossible to split up. Simply copy all of the item accessors in ctree.h and paste them in accessors.h, and then update any files to include the header so everything compiles. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ reformat comments, style fixups ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move fs wide helpers out of ctree.hJosef Bacik1-0/+1
We have several fs wide related helpers in ctree.h. The bulk of these are the incompat flag test helpers, but there are things such as btrfs_fs_closing() and the read only helpers that also aren't directly related to the ctree code. Move these into a fs.h header, which will serve as the location for file system wide related helpers. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS into scrub.cJosef Bacik1-0/+11
This is only used locally in scrub.c, move it out of ctree.h into scrub.c. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-11-07btrfs: zoned: fix locking imbalance on scrubJohannes Thumshirn1-1/+0
If we're doing device replace on a zoned filesystem and discover in scrub_enumerate_chunks() that we don't have to copy the block group it is unlocked before it gets skipped. But as the block group hasn't yet been locked before it leads to a locking imbalance. To fix this simply remove the unlock. This was uncovered by fstests' testcase btrfs/163. Fixes: 9283b9e09a6d ("btrfs: remove lock protection for BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_TO_COPY") Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-11-07Revert "btrfs: scrub: use larger block size for data extent scrub"Qu Wenruo1-7/+1
This reverts commit 786672e9e1a39a231806313e3c445c236588ceef. [BUG] Since commit 786672e9e1a3 ("btrfs: scrub: use larger block size for data extent scrub"), btrfs scrub no longer reports errors if the corruption is not in the first sector of a STRIPE_LEN. The following script can expose the problem: mkfs.btrfs -f $dev mount $dev $mnt xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xff 0 8k" $mnt/foobar umount $mnt # 13631488 is the logical bytenr of above 8K extent btrfs-map-logical -l 13631488 -b 4096 $dev mirror 1 logical 13631488 physical 13631488 device /dev/test/scratch1 # Corrupt the 2nd sector of that extent xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x00 13635584 4k" $dev mount $dev $mnt btrfs scrub start -B $mnt scrub done for 54e63f9f-0c30-4c84-a33b-5c56014629b7 Scrub started: Mon Nov 7 07:18:27 2022 Status: finished Duration: 0:00:00 Total to scrub: 536.00MiB Rate: 0.00B/s Error summary: no errors found <<< [CAUSE] That offending commit enlarges the data extent scrub size from sector size to BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN, to avoid extra scrub_block to be allocated. But unfortunately the data extent scrub is still heavily relying on the fact that there is only one scrub_sector per scrub_block. Thus it will only check the first sector, and ignoring the remaining sectors. Furthermore the error reporting is not able to handle multiple sectors either. [FIX] For now just revert the offending commit. The consequence is just extra memory usage during scrub. We will need a proper change to make the remaining data scrub path to handle multiple sectors before we enlarging the data scrub size. Reported-by: Li Zhang <zhanglikernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-29btrfs: make can_nocow_extent nowait compatibleJosef Bacik1-2/+2
If we have NOWAIT specified on our IOCB and we're writing into a PREALLOC or NOCOW extent then we need to be able to tell can_nocow_extent that we don't want to wait on any locks or metadata IO. Fix can_nocow_extent to allow for NOWAIT. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: properly abstract the parity raid bio handlingChristoph Hellwig1-3/+5
The parity raid write/recover functionality is currently not very well abstracted from the bio submission and completion handling in volumes.c: - the raid56 code directly completes the original btrfs_bio fed into btrfs_submit_bio instead of dispatching back to volumes.c - the raid56 code consumes the bioc and bio_counter references taken by volumes.c, which also leads to special casing of the calls from the scrub code into the raid56 code To fix this up supply a bi_end_io handler that calls back into the volumes.c machinery, which then puts the bioc, decrements the bio_counter and completes the original bio, and updates the scrub code to also take ownership of the bioc and bio_counter in all cases. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: scrub: use larger block size for data extent scrubQu Wenruo1-1/+7
[PROBLEM] The existing scrub code for data extents always limit the block size to sectorsize. This causes quite some extra scrub_block being allocated: (there is a data extent at logical bytenr 298844160, length 64KiB) alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298848256 physical=298848256 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298852352 physical=298852352 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298856448 physical=298856448 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298860544 physical=298860544 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298864640 physical=298864640 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298868736 physical=298868736 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298872832 physical=298872832 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298876928 physical=298876928 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298881024 physical=298881024 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298885120 physical=298885120 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298889216 physical=298889216 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298893312 physical=298893312 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298897408 physical=298897408 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298901504 physical=298901504 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298905600 physical=298905600 mirror=1 ... scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298848256 physical=298848256 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298852352 physical=298852352 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298856448 physical=298856448 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298860544 physical=298860544 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298864640 physical=298864640 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298868736 physical=298868736 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298872832 physical=298872832 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298876928 physical=298876928 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298881024 physical=298881024 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298885120 physical=298885120 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298889216 physical=298889216 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298893312 physical=298893312 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298897408 physical=298897408 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298901504 physical=298901504 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298905600 physical=298905600 len=4096 mirror=1 This behavior will waste a lot of memory, especially after we have moved quite some members from scrub_sector to scrub_block. [FIX] To reduce the allocation of scrub_block, and to reduce memory usage, use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN instead of sectorsize as the block size to scrub data extents. This results only one scrub_block to be allocated for above data extent: alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 len=65536 mirror=1 This would greatly reduce the memory usage (even it's just transient) for larger data extents scrub. For above example, the memory usage would be: Old: num_sectors * (sizeof(scrub_block) + sizeof(scrub_sector)) 16 * (408 + 96) = 8065 New: sizeof(scrub_block) + num_sectors * sizeof(scrub_sector) 408 + 16 * 96 = 1944 A good reduction of 75.9%. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: scrub: move logical/physical/dev/mirror_num from scrub_sector to ↵Qu Wenruo1-73/+92
scrub_block Currently we store the following members in scrub_sector: - logical - physical - physical_for_dev_replace - dev - mirror_num However the current scrub code has ensured that scrub_blocks never cross stripe boundary. This is caused by the entry functions (scrub_simple_mirror, scrub_simple_stripe), thus every scrub_block will not cross stripe boundary. Thus this makes it possible to move those members into scrub_block other than putting them into scrub_sector. This should save quite some memory, as a scrub_block can be as large as 64 sectors, even for metadata it's 16 sectors byte default. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: scrub: remove scrub_sector::page and use scrub_block::pages insteadQu Wenruo1-32/+67
Although scrub currently works for subpage (PAGE_SIZE > sectorsize) cases, it will allocate one page for each scrub_sector, which can cause extra unnecessary memory usage. Utilize scrub_block::pages[] instead of allocating page for each scrub_sector, this allows us to integrate larger extents while using less memory. For example, if our page size is 64K, sectorsize is 4K, and we got an 32K sized extent. We will only allocate one page for scrub_block, and all 8 scrub sectors will point to that page. To do that properly, here we introduce several small helpers: - scrub_page_get_logical() Get the logical bytenr of a page. We store the logical bytenr of the page range into page::private. But for 32bit systems, their (void *) is not large enough to contain a u64, so in that case we will need to allocate extra memory for it. For 64bit systems, we can use page::private directly. - scrub_block_get_logical() Just get the logical bytenr of the first page. - scrub_sector_get_page() Return the page which the scrub_sector points to. - scrub_sector_get_page_offset() Return the offset inside the page which the scrub_sector points to. - scrub_sector_get_kaddr() Return the address which the scrub_sector points to. Just a wrapper using scrub_sector_get_page() and scrub_sector_get_page_offset() - bio_add_scrub_sector() Please note that, even with this patch, we're still allocating one page for one sector for data extents. This is because in scrub_extent() we split the data extent using sectorsize. The memory usage reduction will need extra work to make scrub to work like data read to only use the correct sector(s). Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: scrub: introduce scrub_block::pages for more efficient memory usage ↵Qu Wenruo1-22/+116
for subpage [BACKGROUND] Currently for scrub, we allocate one page for one sector, this is fine for PAGE_SIZE == sectorsize support, but can waste extra memory for subpage support. [CODE CHANGE] Make scrub_block contain all the pages, so if we're scrubbing an extent sized 64K, and our page size is also 64K, we only need to allocate one page. [LIFESPAN CHANGE] Since now scrub_sector no longer holds a page, but is using scrub_block::pages[] instead, we have to ensure scrub_block has a longer lifespan for write bio. The lifespan for read bio is already large enough. Now scrub_block will only be released after the write bio finished. [COMING NEXT] Currently we only added scrub_block::pages[] for this purpose, but scrub_sector is still utilizing the old scrub_sector::page. The switch will happen in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: scrub: factor out allocation and initialization of scrub_sector into ↵Qu Wenruo1-31/+29
helper The allocation and initialization is shared by 3 call sites, and we're going to change the initialization of some members in the upcoming patches. So factor out the allocation and initialization of scrub_sector into a helper, alloc_scrub_sector(), which will do the following work: - Allocate the memory for scrub_sector - Allocate a page for scrub_sector::page - Initialize scrub_sector::refs to 1 - Attach the allocated scrub_sector to scrub_block The attachment is bidirectional, which means scrub_block::sectorv[] will be updated and scrub_sector::sblock will also be updated. - Update scrub_block::sector_count and do extra sanity check on it Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: scrub: factor out initialization of scrub_block into helperQu Wenruo1-23/+23
Although there are only two callers, we are going to add some members for scrub_block in the incoming patches. Factoring out the initialization code will make later expansion easier. One thing to note is, even scrub_handle_errored_block() doesn't utilize scrub_block::refs, we still use alloc_scrub_block() to initialize sblock::ref, allowing us to use scrub_block_put() to do cleanup. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: scrub: use pointer array to replace sblocks_for_recheckQu Wenruo1-46/+53
In function scrub_handle_errored_block(), we use @sblocks_for_recheck pointer to hold one scrub_block for each mirror, and uses kcalloc() to allocate an array. But this one pointer for an array is not readable due to the member offsets done by addition and not []. Change this pointer to struct scrub_block *[BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS], this will slightly increase the stack memory usage. Since function scrub_handle_errored_block() won't get iterative calls, this extra cost would completely be acceptable. And since we're here, also set sblock->refs and use scrub_block_put() to clean them up, as later we will add extra members in scrub_block, which needs scrub_block_put() to clean them up. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: scrub: remove impossible sanity checksQu Wenruo1-25/+9
There are several sanity checks which are no longer possible to trigger inside btrfs_scrub_dev(). Since we have mount time check against super block nodesize/sectorsize, and our fixed macro is hardcoded to handle even the worst combination. Thus those sanity checks are no longer needed, can be easily removed. But this patch still uses some ASSERT()s as a safe net just in case we change some features in the future to trigger those impossible combinations. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: remove lock protection for BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_TO_COPYJosef Bacik1-2/+0
We use this during device replace for zoned devices, we were simply taking the lock because it was in a bit field and we needed the lock to be safe with other modifications in the bitfield. With the bit helpers we no longer require that locking. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: convert block group bit field to use bit helpersJosef Bacik1-6/+6
We use a bit field in the btrfs_block_group for different flags, however this is awkward because we have to hold the block_group->lock for any modification of any of these fields, and makes the code clunky for a few of these flags. Convert these to a properly flags setup so we can utilize the bit helpers. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: scrub: try to fix super block errorsQu Wenruo1-0/+36
[BUG] The following script shows that, although scrub can detect super block errors, it never tries to fix it: mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 -m raid1 $dev1 $dev2 xfs_io -c "pwrite 67108864 4k" $dev2 mount $dev1 $mnt btrfs scrub start -B $dev2 btrfs scrub start -Br $dev2 umount $mnt The first scrub reports the super error correctly: scrub done for f3289218-abd3-41ac-a630-202f766c0859 Scrub started: Tue Aug 2 14:44:11 2022 Status: finished Duration: 0:00:00 Total to scrub: 1.26GiB Rate: 0.00B/s Error summary: super=1 Corrected: 0 Uncorrectable: 0 Unverified: 0 But the second read-only scrub still reports the same super error: Scrub started: Tue Aug 2 14:44:11 2022 Status: finished Duration: 0:00:00 Total to scrub: 1.26GiB Rate: 0.00B/s Error summary: super=1 Corrected: 0 Uncorrectable: 0 Unverified: 0 [CAUSE] The comments already shows that super block can be easily fixed by committing a transaction: /* * If we find an error in a super block, we just report it. * They will get written with the next transaction commit * anyway */ But the truth is, such assumption is not always true, and since scrub should try to repair every error it found (except for read-only scrub), we should really actively commit a transaction to fix this. [FIX] Just commit a transaction if we found any super block errors, after everything else is done. We cannot do this just after scrub_supers(), as btrfs_commit_transaction() will try to pause and wait for the running scrub, thus we can not call it with scrub_lock hold. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: scrub: properly report super block errors in system logQu Wenruo1-21/+12
[PROBLEM] Unlike data/metadata corruption, if scrub detected some error in the super block, the only error message is from the updated device status: BTRFS info (device dm-1): scrub: started on devid 2 BTRFS error (device dm-1): bdev /dev/mapper/test-scratch2 errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 1, gen 0 BTRFS info (device dm-1): scrub: finished on devid 2 with status: 0 This is not helpful at all. [CAUSE] Unlike data/metadata error reporting, there is no visible report in kernel dmesg to report supper block errors. In fact, return value of scrub_checksum_super() is intentionally skipped, thus scrub_handle_errored_block() will never be called for super blocks. [FIX] Make super block errors to output an error message, now the full dmesg would looks like this: BTRFS info (device dm-1): scrub: started on devid 2 BTRFS warning (device dm-1): super block error on device /dev/mapper/test-scratch2, physical 67108864 BTRFS error (device dm-1): bdev /dev/mapper/test-scratch2 errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 1, gen 0 BTRFS info (device dm-1): scrub: finished on devid 2 with status: 0 BTRFS info (device dm-1): scrub: started on devid 2 This fix involves: - Move the super_errors reporting to scrub_handle_errored_block() This allows the device status message to show after the super block error message. But now we no longer distinguish super block corruption and generation mismatch, now all counted as corruption. - Properly check the return value from scrub_checksum_super() - Add extra super block error reporting for scrub_print_warning(). Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: do not return errors from raid56_parity_recoverChristoph Hellwig1-8/+2
Always consume the bio and call the end_io handler on error instead of returning an error and letting the caller handle it. This matches what the block layer submission does and avoids any confusion on who needs to handle errors. Also use the proper bool type for the generic_io argument. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: raid56: use fixed stripe length everywhereChristoph Hellwig1-6/+3
The raid56 code assumes a fixed stripe length BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN but there are functions passing it as arguments, this is not necessary. The fixed value has been used for a long time and though the stripe length should be configurable by super block member stripesize, this hasn't been implemented and would require more changes so we don't need to keep this code around until then. Partially based on a patch from Qu Wenruo. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> [ update changelog ] Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: remove parameter dev_extent_len from scrub_stripe()Qu Wenruo1-7/+8
For scrub_stripe() we can easily calculate the dev extent length as we have the full info of the chunk. Thus there is no need to pass @dev_extent_len from the caller, and we introduce a helper, btrfs_calc_stripe_length(), to do the calculation from extent_map structure. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: use integrated bitmaps for scrub_parity::dbitmap and ebitmapQu Wenruo1-24/+13
Previously we use "unsigned long *" for those two bitmaps. But since we only support fixed stripe length (64KiB, already checked in tree-checker), "unsigned long *" is really a waste of memory, while we can just use "unsigned long". This saves us 8 bytes in total for scrub_parity. To be extra safe, add an ASSERT() making sure calclulated @nsectors is always smaller than BITS_PER_LONG. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: scrub: move scrub_remap_extent() call into scrub_extent()Qu Wenruo1-27/+35
[SUSPICIOUS CODE] When refactoring scrub code, I noticed a very strange behavior around scrub_remap_extent(): if (sctx->is_dev_replace) scrub_remap_extent(fs_info, cur_logical, scrub_len, &cur_physical, &target_dev, &cur_mirror); As replace target is a 1:1 copy of the source device, thus physical offset inside the target should be the same as physical inside source, thus this remap call makes no sense to me. [REAL FUNCTIONALITY] After more investigation, the function name scrub_remap_extent() doesn't tell anything of the truth, nor does its if () condition. The real story behind this function is that, for scrub_pages() we never expect missing device, even for replacing missing device. What scrub_remap_extent() is really doing is to find a live mirror, and make later scrub_pages() to read data from the good copy, other than from the missing device and increase error counters unnecessarily. [IMPROVEMENT] We have no need to bother scrub_remap_extent() in scrub_simple_mirror() at all, we only need to call it before we call scrub_pages(). And rename the function to scrub_find_live_copy(), add extra comments on them. By this we can remove one parameter from scrub_extent(), and reduce the unnecessary calls to scrub_remap_extent() for regular replace. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: scrub: use find_first_extent_item to for extent item searchQu Wenruo1-73/+25
Since we have find_first_extent_item() to iterate the extent items of a certain range, there is no need to use the open-coded version. Replace the final scrub call site with find_first_extent_item(). Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: scrub: refactor scrub_raid56_parity()Qu Wenruo1-181/+164
Currently scrub_raid56_parity() has a large double loop, handling the following things at the same time: - Iterate each data stripe - Iterate each extent item in one data stripe Refactor this by: - Introduce a new helper to handle data stripe iteration The new helper is scrub_raid56_data_stripe_for_parity(), which only has one while() loop handling the extent items inside the data stripe. The code is still mostly the same as the old code. - Call cond_resched() for each extent Previously we only call cond_resched() under a complex if () check. I see no special reason to do that, and for other scrub functions, like scrub_simple_mirror() we're already doing the same cond_resched() after scrubbing one extent. - Add more comments Please note that, this patch is only to address the double loop, there are incoming patches to do extra cleanup. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: scrub: use scrub_simple_mirror() to handle RAID56 data stripe scrubQu Wenruo1-226/+21
Although RAID56 has complex repair mechanism, which involves reading the whole full stripe, but inside one data stripe, it's in fact no different than SINGLE/RAID1. The point here is, for data stripe we just check the csum for each extent we hit. Only for csum mismatch case, our repair paths divide. So we can still reuse scrub_simple_mirror() for RAID56 data stripes, which saves quite some code. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: scrub: cleanup the non-RAID56 branches in scrub_stripe()Qu Wenruo1-77/+51
Since we have moved all other profiles handling into their own functions, now the main body of scrub_stripe() is just handling RAID56 profiles. There is no need to address other profiles in the main loop of scrub_stripe(), so we can remove those dead branches. Since we're here, also slightly change the timing of initialization of variables like @offset, @increment and @logical. Especially for @logical, we don't really need to initialize it for btrfs_extent_root()/btrfs_csum_root(), we can use bg->start for that purpose. Now those variables are only initialize for RAID56 branches. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: scrub: introduce dedicated helper to scrub simple-stripe based rangeQu Wenruo1-12/+88
The new entrance will iterate through each data stripe which belongs to the target device. And since inside each data stripe, RAID0 is just SINGLE, while RAID10 is just RAID1, we can reuse scrub_simple_mirror() to do the scrub properly. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: scrub: introduce dedicated helper to scrub simple-mirror based rangeQu Wenruo1-0/+188
The new helper, scrub_simple_mirror(), will scrub all extents inside a range which only has simple mirror based duplication. This covers every range of SINGLE/DUP/RAID1/RAID1C*, and inside each data stripe for RAID0/RAID10. Currently we will use this function to scrub SINGLE/DUP/RAID1/RAID1C* profiles. As one can see, the new entrance for those simple-mirror based profiles can be small enough (with comments, just reach 100 lines). This function will be the basis for the incoming scrub refactor. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: scrub: introduce a helper to locate an extent itemQu Wenruo1-0/+107
The new helper, find_first_extent_item(), will locate an extent item (either EXTENT_ITEM or METADATA_ITEM) which covers any byte of the search range. This helper will later be used to refactor scrub code. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: calculate physical_end using dev_extent_len directly in scrub_stripe()Qu Wenruo1-4/+2
The variable @physical_end is the exclusive stripe end, currently it's calculated using @physical + @dev_extent_len / map->stripe_len * map->stripe_len. And since at allocation time we ensured dev_extent_len is stripe_len aligned, the result is the same as @physical + @dev_extent_len. So this patch will just assign @physical and @physical_end early, without using @nstripes. This is especially helpful for any possible out: label user, as now we only need to initialize @offset before going to out: label. Since we're here, also make @physical_end constant. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: use normal workqueues for scrubChristoph Hellwig1-41/+38
All three scrub workqueues don't need ordered execution or thread disabling threshold (as the thresh parameter is less than DFT_THRESHOLD). Just switch to the normal workqueues that use a lot less resources, especially in the work_struct vs btrfs_work structures. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: raid56: make raid56_add_scrub_pages() subpage compatibleQu Wenruo1-1/+5
This requires one extra parameter @pgoff for the function. In the current code base, scrub is still one page per sector, thus the new parameter will always be 0. It needs the extra subpage scrub optimization code to fully take advantage. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: don't allocate a btrfs_bio for scrub biosChristoph Hellwig1-29/+15
All the scrub bios go straight to the block device or the raid56 code, none of which looks at the btrfs_bio. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: use on-stack bio in scrub_repair_page_from_good_copyChristoph Hellwig1-14/+9
The I/O in repair_io_failue is synchronous and doesn't need a btrfs_bio, so just use an on-stack bio. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: use on-stack bio in scrub_recheck_blockChristoph Hellwig1-10/+8
The I/O in repair_io_failue is synchronous and doesn't need a btrfs_bio, so just use an on-stack bio. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>